iHaveNet.com
Economic News, Economy News Articles, Economics, Economists Jobs & Careers | The Economy
Online Breaking News Headlines Single Source to Headlines Breaking News Current Events Top Stories. Find out what is happening in News & the World. Check out iHaveNet.com for the latest news & current events articles plus Movie Reviews, Wolfgang Puck Recipes, NFL Previews Analysis and Politics. Your Single Source to News Articles, Current Events & Reviews.
  • HOME
  • WORLD
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Balkans
    • Caucasas
    • Central Asia
    • Eastern Europe
    • Europe
    • Indian Subcontinent
    • Latin America
    • Middle East
    • North Africa
    • Scandinavia
    • Southeast Asia
    • United Kingdom
    • United States
    • Argentina
    • Australia
    • Austria
    • Benelux
    • Brazil
    • Canada
    • China
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Ireland
    • Israel
    • Italy
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Mexico
    • New Zealand
    • Pakistan
    • Philippines
    • Poland
    • Russia
    • South Africa
    • Spain
    • Taiwan
    • Turkey
    • United States
  • USA
    • ECONOMICS
    • EDUCATION
    • ENVIRONMENT
    • FOREIGN POLICY
    • POLITICS
    • OPINION
    • TRADE
    • Atlanta
    • Baltimore
    • Bay Area
    • Boston
    • Chicago
    • Cleveland
    • DC Area
    • Dallas
    • Denver
    • Detroit
    • Houston
    • Los Angeles
    • Miami
    • New York
    • Philadelphia
    • Phoenix
    • Pittsburgh
    • Portland
    • San Diego
    • Seattle
    • Silicon Valley
    • Saint Louis
    • Tampa
    • Twin Cities
  • BUSINESS
    • FEATURES
    • eBUSINESS
    • HUMAN RESOURCES
    • MANAGEMENT
    • MARKETING
    • ENTREPRENEUR
    • SMALL BUSINESS
    • STOCK MARKETS
    • Agriculture
    • Airline
    • Auto
    • Beverage
    • Biotech
    • Book
    • Broadcast
    • Cable
    • Chemical
    • Clothing
    • Construction
    • Defense
    • Durable
    • Engineering
    • Electronics
    • Firearms
    • Food
    • Gaming
    • Healthcare
    • Hospitality
    • Leisure
    • Logistics
    • Metals
    • Mining
    • Movie
    • Music
    • Newspaper
    • Nondurable
    • Oil & Gas
    • Packaging
    • Pharmaceutic
    • Plastics
    • Real Estate
    • Retail
    • Shipping
    • Sports
    • Steelmaking
    • Textiles
    • Tobacco
    • Transportation
    • Travel
    • Utilities
  • WEALTH
    • CAREERS
    • INVESTING
    • PERSONAL FINANCE
    • REAL ESTATE
    • MARKETS
    • BUSINESS
  • STOCKS
    • ECONOMY
    • EMERGING MARKETS
    • STOCKS
    • FED WATCH
    • TECH STOCKS
    • BIOTECHS
    • COMMODITIES
    • MUTUAL FUNDS / ETFs
    • MERGERS / ACQUISITIONS
    • IPOs
    • 3M (MMM)
    • AT&T (T)
    • AIG (AIG)
    • Alcoa (AA)
    • Altria (MO)
    • American Express (AXP)
    • Apple (AAPL)
    • Bank of America (BAC)
    • Boeing (BA)
    • Caterpillar (CAT)
    • Chevron (CVX)
    • Cisco (CSCO)
    • Citigroup (C)
    • Coca Cola (KO)
    • Dell (DELL)
    • DuPont (DD)
    • Eastman Kodak (EK)
    • ExxonMobil (XOM)
    • FedEx (FDX)
    • General Electric (GE)
    • General Motors (GM)
    • Google (GOOG)
    • Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)
    • Home Depot (HD)
    • Honeywell (HON)
    • IBM (IBM)
    • Intel (INTC)
    • Int'l Paper (IP)
    • JP Morgan Chase (JPM)
    • J & J (JNJ)
    • McDonalds (MCD)
    • Merck (MRK)
    • Microsoft (MSFT)
    • P & G (PG)
    • United Tech (UTX)
    • Wal-Mart (WMT)
    • Walt Disney (DIS)
  • TECH
    • ADVANCED
    • FEATURES
    • INTERNET
    • INTERNET FEATURES
    • CYBERCULTURE
    • eCOMMERCE
    • mp3
    • SECURITY
    • GAMES
    • HANDHELD
    • SOFTWARE
    • PERSONAL
    • WIRELESS
  • HEALTH
    • AGING
    • ALTERNATIVE
    • AILMENTS
    • DRUGS
    • FITNESS
    • GENETICS
    • CHILDREN'S
    • MEN'S
    • WOMEN'S
  • LIFESTYLE
    • AUTOS
    • HOBBIES
    • EDUCATION
    • FAMILY
    • FASHION
    • FOOD
    • HOME DECOR
    • RELATIONSHIPS
    • PARENTING
    • PETS
    • TRAVEL
    • WOMEN
  • ENTERTAINMENT
    • BOOKS
    • TELEVISION
    • MUSIC
    • THE ARTS
    • MOVIES
    • CULTURE
  • SPORTS
    • BASEBALL
    • BASKETBALL
    • COLLEGES
    • FOOTBALL
    • GOLF
    • HOCKEY
    • OLYMPICS
    • SOCCER
    • TENNIS
  • Subscribe to RSS Feeds EMAIL ALERT Subscriptions from iHaveNet.com RSS
    • RSS | Politics
    • RSS | Recipes
    • RSS | NFL Football
    • RSS | Movie Reviews

COMPANIES:       INDUSTRIES:  

HOME > FINANCIAL MARKETS > ECONOMY

 

Economic Risk in 7 Countries Spooking Investors
Matthew Bandyk

Despite federal spending consuming 27.2 percent of GDP, the United States maintains a Aaa rating. But you can't say the same about many countries in both the developed and developing world where continued fallout from the economic crisis is hurting their credit ratings. As a result, investors have viewed the economic situations in these countries as increasingly risky bets.

 


The Emerging Economic Order
(c) Jack Ohman

The New Population Bomb
Jack A. Goldstone

Averting this century's potential dangers will require sweeping measures. Policymakers must adapt today's global governance institutions to the new realities of the aging of the industrialized world, the concentration of the world's economic and population growth in developing countries, and the increase in international immigration.

President Obama's Surprising Relationship With Lobbyists and Big Business: Tim Carney discusses Obamanomics
Jessica Rettig

Barack Obama campaigned for president, says Tim Carney, as an advocate for big government, claiming that more federal regulation and spending will protect American consumers against the excesses of big business. But, Carney argues the president's push for more intervention actually favors big business and lobbying

Keep Congress Away From the Fed
Mortimer B. Zuckerman

The Federal Reserve has to be protected. If global financial markets came to believe that Congress and political pressure was determining monetary policy, there would be dangerous consequences.

The Case for a National Infrastructure Bank
Mortimer B. Zuckerman

The costs of long neglect of our infrastructure and our precious land -- and the commensurate benefits of doing something about it -- are manifest to every commuter, every driver, every airline passenger, every flood victim. Now, the vital rebuilding of America must begin with federal government money

Latin America: Chile Now One Step Closer to First World
Andres Oppenheimer

Recently, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) -- the club of the world's richest democracies -- formally invited Chile to become a member. Chile had applied for membership two years ago. Chile will become the first South American member of the OECD

Beginning of a New World Epoch
Paul A. Samuelson

President Barack Obama's 2008 electoral landslide victory averted a global financial meltdown. Had Republican Sen. John McCain won that election, present U.S. GDP would have been even lower than it is now, by more than 15 percent! And similar losses in global productivity would also have taken place.

Unemployment rate in October rockets to 10.2 percent
Unemployment Rockets

October Jobs Report: A True Witches' Brew
Liz Wolgemuth

In what will no doubt boost skepticism over the Obama administration's message of stimulus success, the unemployment rate in October rocketed to 10.2 percent, a figure much higher than economists had expected and just 0.6 percentage points away from the post-World War II high seen in 1982. While unemployment snapped back down swiftly in the early-1980s recession, it is widely expected that job creation will be slow in this recovery.

Economy: Cities Where Jobs Recovery Will Be Slowest
Liz Wolgemuth

While the nation's job market is awful overall -- thousands of Americans are exhausting their unemployment benefits daily -- it's clear that the true jobs picture is as varied as the nation's topography. With the promise of a recovery on the horizon, new data show that the employment upturn will be regional as well

Forget Inflation, Deflation Is a Bigger Danger
Mortimer B. Zuckerman

Inflation typically results from 'too much money chasing too few goods.' Today, too much supply is chasing too little demand. That, coupled with consumers' need to save money to rebuild their finances, raises the risk of deflation, not inflation. And as workers compete for scarce jobs and companies underbid one another for sales, both wages and prices will remain under pressure.

Economy: Finding Opportunity in the Recession
Matthew Bandyk

Of all the industries devastated by the recession, the media has been one of the most notoriously affected. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, 65,000 media jobs were cut in 2008 -- nearly 4 percent of the industry's total. Newspapers are perhaps the biggest loser, with more than 9 percent of jobs eliminated in 2008. However, ...

Unemployment and Foreclosure: If You Don't Have a Job, How Will You Pay the Mortgage
Ilyce Glink

When it comes to foreclosure, the problem isn't just the 7.2 million jobs that have been lost during this great recession. There are millions of Americans who took a huge pay cut to keep their companies going. Unpaid furloughs and 10 to 25 percent pay cuts mean tens of millions of Americans are having a much harder time paying their bills -- and their mortgages are at risk as well.

Latin American Economy Will Do Well, but Not Great
Latin American Current Events, News & Affairs - Andres Oppenheimer

The news that Brazil and Mexico have come out of the recession and are poised for solid growth in 2010 should be celebrated, and both countries' leaders should be given credit for their sound economic management. But in the global economic context, the two Latin American giants' recovery will be modest.

The Dollar and the Deficits
C. Fred Bergsten

The dollar is under attack on two fronts. Private investors are driving it lower in the foreign exchange markets. Monetary authorities are questioning its role as the world's key currency. There is an obvious linkage between the two attacks: expectations of further falls in the dollar's value will accelerate the prospect that foreign central banks will switch to euros

U.S., China and the Emerging Economic Order
Henry Kissinger

The assumption that the end of the recession will restore the familiar global economic system ignores the psychological and political upheaval that has taken place.

A vast tide of liquidity coupled with America's appetite for consumer goods had sent enormous amounts of dollars to China that, in turn, China lent back to us for still more buying.

Economy: Past Stormy Weather and What May Follow
Paul A. Samuelson

The Fed and the majority of the consensus forecasters fear that this expected recovery might be a weak one that does little to reduce Main Street's unemployment. And it may also imply that future private consumer and investment spending will continue to be anemic. That would mean that at the global level there might not be the replay of the old-time drama in which the American locomotive comes to the rescue of depressed economies.

Divine Debt Trumps All
Victor Davis Hanson

In modern America, debt -- whether national, state or trade -- now plays the same overarching role as the ancient Greek notion of fate. And the president, Congress and the states for all their various agendas are impotent since they must first pay back trillions that have long ago been borrowed and spent.

Joseph Stiglitz Left's Favorite U.S. Nobel Economist
Andres Oppenheimer

U.S. Nobel laureate Joseph Stiglitz has become a sort of rock star in left-of-center Latin American countries for his vocal criticism of free-for-all capitalism. But in a wide-ranging interview, he offered some advice that many of his fans in the region may not want to hear.

The Dollar's Fate, in the Longer Term
Paul Kennedy

There is a most interesting debate going on at present in the academic community about the longer-term fate of the U.S. dollar as the supreme reserve currency for foreign-exchange transactions and, more importantly, for the currency holdings of national governments, global companies and the producers of oil, gas and other raw materials.

The Dilemmas of the Dollar
by Barry Eichengreen

Legions of pundits have argued that the dollar's status as a reserve currency has been damaged by the credit crisis of 2007-9. The crisis has not exactly enhanced the attractions of the United States as a supplier of high-quality financial assets. It would be no surprise if the disfunctionality of U.S. financial markets diminished the appetite of foreign central banks for U.S. debt securities.

Low and Behold the Price of Oil
by Edward L. Morse

The rapid fall and then rebound in oil prices over the past year surprised many people. But it was not unusual: commodities markets are cyclical by nature and have a history punctuated by sudden turning points. Although this generally makes it difficult to forecast prices, it is safe to say that commodities markets will remain lower over the next few years than they have been over the past five.

General Motors: 'Cash for Clunkers' a Huge Success
Amanda Ruggeri

Not everyone supported the Senate's passage of a bill that boosted "cash for clunkers" by $2 billion, effectively extending it through Labor Day. But it's hard to argue that the program, which gives rebates to people who trade in old cars for more fuel-efficient vehicles, hasn't made the auto industry happy. That's true for General Motors ...

Growth With Equity: Brazil's Path to Economic Recovery
by Patrus Ananias

The financial crisis has left few corners of the global economy unscathed, but many of the loudest cries reflecting the deepest pain are largely ignored. These are the cries of the world's poorest citizens whose suffering is not measured in battered portfolios and retirement plans but in their daily survival

States Forced to Cut Services to the Bone: Opportunity Cost of the Bank Bailout (c) Paul Tong
Government Bailout
(c) Paul Tong

Opportunity Cost of the Bank Bailout
Arianna Huffington

The lopsided 'recovery.' Banks that received billions in taxpayer handouts now reporting massive profits and setting aside record amounts for executive bonuses, and the American people continuing to face 9.5 percent unemployment, 10,000 foreclosures a day and vital services being cut.

Boomers, Housing and Retirement:
A Symbiotic Relationship Unravels

By Mark Miller

The housing market is showing some tentative signs of recovery. But if you're a baby boomer relying on housing wealth to help fund retirement, don't hold your breath. True, the most recent Standard and Poor's/Case-Shiller home price index showed that U.S. home prices rose in May on a month-to-month basis for the first time since July 2006. But that shouldn't be taken as a sign that the market is going to rebound to pre-crash levels anytime soon. At best, the Case-Shiller index hints that we may have found a bottom in housing. Maybe

Is the Economic Marriage Between China and U.S. on the Rocks?
Niall Ferguson Interview

China and America had effectively fused to become a single economy: Chimerica. The Chinese did the saving, the Americans the spending. The Chinese did the exporting, the Americans the importing. The Chinese did the lending, the Americans the borrowing. As the Chinese strategy was based on export-led growth, they had no desire to see their currency appreciate against the dollar. The unintended effect of this was to help finance the U.S. current account deficit at very low interest rates. Without that, it's hard to believe that U.S. financial markets would have bubbled the way they did from 2002 to 2007.

Nine Reasons the Economy is Not Getting Better
Mortimer B. Zuckerman

We are now looking at unemployment numbers that undermine any confidence that we might be nearing the bottom of the recession. The appropriate metaphor is not the green shoots of new growth. A better image is to look at the true total of jobless people as a prudent navigator looks at an iceberg

House Votes to Give Cash for Clunkers Another $2 Billion
Amanda Ruggeri

After "cash for clunkers" proved so popular that it threatened to run out of cash within its first week, the House pushed aside the other items on its agenda today to save it, passing a bill that allots another $2 billion to keep the program running. The passage of the bill, by a vote of 316 to 109, helps stave off a temporary shutdown of the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save (CARS) program.

4 Things to Know About the Cash-Strapped 'Cash for Clunkers'
Matthew Bandyk

The government set aside $1 billion for the "cash for clunkers" program, which is meant to give $3,500 or $4,500 vouchers to people who trade in their gas-guzzling vehicles for new, fuel-efficient ones. But now that the White House says the program doesn't have enough money to get through the weekend, many consumers are confused about what to do next. Here are four things that consumers can do in this rapidly-changing environment

Cash for Clunkers Program Has Its Roadblocks
Kathy Kristof

If you want to trade in your junker for a new vehicle under the federal government's 'cash for clunkers' program, you'll have to act fast. Plus, qualifying for the vouchers isn't as simple as you might think. In fact, you'll need to know three things to decide whether it's a good deal for you.

Making Sense of 'Cash for Clunkers'
Matthew Bandyk

With new-car sales slumping, automotive companies have been looking for ways to get consumers back into showrooms. Washington checked one item off car companies' wish list when it passed the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Act of 2009 -- commonly known as 'Cash for Clunkers' ...

Why June Jobs Report Is So Depressing
Liz Wolgemuth

The brutal truth about the Labor Department's June jobs report is that it offers strong evidence companies are still hacking away at their payroll costs -- slicing hours and chopping jobs. Employers cut 467,000 jobs last month, according to the report. The unemployment rate -- a measure of the percentage of workers who are unemployed and looking for work -- rose slightly to 9.5 percent, from 9.4 percent in May.

Unemployment Reaches 9.5 Percent, Highest in 26 Years
Amanda Ruggeri

The Labor Department's job report this morning may not be surprising, but it's still disappointing: The unemployment rate rose in June to 9.5 percent, making it the worst in 26 years. The rise, from 9.4 percent in May, is slight. However, it keeps the economy on track to hit a 10 percent unemployment level by the end of the year, as analysts have predicted.

Would Second Stimulus Create Jobs?
Liz Wolgemuth

Americans are stumbling through a job market that is overwhelmed with supply, stripped of security, and skimmed of hours and benefits, and the unemployment rate has already climbed much higher than officials had forecast. So, the real question is, what could a second Obama administration stimulus do that the first one couldn't? To answer that, it's necessary to know how the first $787 billion package has disappointed.

Accurately Counting Stimulus Jobs Proving Tough
Amanda Ruggeri

As Americans become more skeptical of the administration's promise that the stimulus package will create or save 3.5 million jobs, there's an added frustration: Even if the $787 billion act is successful in creating work, Americans may never know. That's because counting the jobs involves estimating what would have happened without legislation, a slippery task even if the economy weren't so volatile.

Economists Jobs & Careers Search

Find your next job as an Economist today. In one simple search, get free access to millions of employment opportunities from thousands of websites.

 

We've Gone From Saving Wall Street in Order to Save Main Street to Just Saving Wall Street
Arianna Huffington

Remember how, when taxpayers were being asked to fork over billions of dollars to bail out Wall Street, we were told it was essential to saving Main Street? Well, in just a few months, we've gone from saving the banks in order to save the economy to just saving the banks. It's the opposite of mission creep.

economy; recession; hit bottom. Waiting for the Payoff: Debate Continues Over Obama's Recovery Plan | iHaveNet.com
Editorial Cartoon by David Horsey

Happy Economic Recovery vs. An Anemic One
Paul A. Samuelson

The number-one question preoccupying economists, policy agents of government and Main Street families is this:

Will "recovery" from the current U.S. financial meltdown arrive before the end of 2009? Or, failing that, will it at least arrive early in 2010?

 

Geopolitical Consequences of the Financial Crisis
Roger C. Altman

It is now clear that the global economic crisis will be deep and prolonged and that it will have far-reaching geopolitical consequences. The long movement toward market liberalization has stopped, and a new period of state intervention, reregulation, and creeping protectionism has begun.

Economic Crisis will Create the Social Heroes of Tomorrow
Alvin and Heidi Toffler

The economic crisis now gripping the world is going to go away. We may not know precisely when, where and how. But one thing is certain. Nothing is likely to blow away the waves of change that have marked human history

House Prices, Mortgage Interest Rates Key to Housing Market Recovery
By Ilyce Glink

With housing prices falling and mortgage interest rates rising, it's hard to say the housing market has bottomed out. And, yet, there are some reasons for a more optimistic housing forecast, according to Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Economy.com

10 Most Dollar-Discounted Housing Markets
By Luke Mullins

As the historic real estate bust continues to gut home prices throughout the country, property owners everywhere are scrambling to attract buyers. For some home sellers, that might mean chipping in for closing costs; others might try to sweeten the deal by handing out perks, like a free parking spot. But for many homeowners, the most efficient way to sell a home in a depressed market is to simply drop the listing price.

Joseph Stiglitz:
Will Capitalism Survive Wall Street Apocalypse

Matthew Bandyk

A few days after writing about how the United States is not heading towards socialism, Joseph Stiglitz suggests that might not be true about the rest of the world. Stiglitz argues that the lesson many Third World nations might take from the financial crisis is that capitalism is fundamentally flawed.

Asia Economy: Tamed Asian Tigers, Distressed Chinese Dragon
by Brian P. Klein and Kenneth Neil Cukier

Since the 1960s, Asian economies have focused primarily on exports. It was the key to success in Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan. Much of Southeast Asia and China soon followed suit. Over the past decade, the region's exports have increased from 37 percent to 47 percent of GDP. By hitching their wagons to exports, however, Asian countries left themselves vulnerable to a drop-off in Western consumption

Whistling Past Economic Graveyard: Audacity of Misplaced Hope
by Arianna Huffington

When Tim Geithner unveiled the Public Private Investment Program, he said that dealing with these assets was a "core" part of solving the financial crisis. But the banks would much rather keep pretending that their toxic assets are not that toxic, and worth much more than they really are -- a risky charade the relaxed mark-to-market rules allow them to continue to pull off

Not Going to Be Economic Depression
Global Economic Viewpoint

Global Economy | Worse & Worser | iHaveNet.com

Last week at the Milken Global Conference, three Noble Laureates in Economics sat down to discuss the global recession -- Gary Becker (Nobel Prize, 1992), Roger Myerson (Nobel Prize, 2007) and Myron Scholes (Nobel Prize 1997).

All three agreed that this is not going to be a depression and that the free-market economy is fundamentally healthy.

Why No One Can Guess When
Main Street Recovery will Occur

Paul A. Samuelson

Federal Reserve Chairmen Ben Bernanke glimpses a possible recovery by year end. He is a cautious scholar, backed by the best forecasters in the world at the Federal Reserve Board.

I would be a rash fool to quarrel with this quasi-optimistic view that by year end some stability will occur. You and I should hope that there will indeed be a glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel ahead. But shift our vision now to the future. Even if the short run prospect for a 2009-2010 recovery turns out to be good, I must warn once again that the long-run outlook for the U.S. dollar is hazardous.

Free-Market Economy Fundamentally Healthy
Global Economic Viewpoint

Last week at the Milken Global Conference, three Noble Laureates in Economics sat down to discuss the global recession -- Gary Becker (Nobel Prize, 1992), Roger Myerson (Nobel Prize, 2007) and Myron Scholes (Nobel Prize 1997).

All three agreed that this is not going to be a depression and that the free-market economy is fundamentally healthy.

Brazil, China & India Can Mitigate Global Crisis
Global Economic Viewpoint

Brazil, India and even China will not be able, by themselves, to correct the dysfunctions that produced the global crisis. But it is true that the economic power of these three countries can mitigate its negative consequences. ...

The Global Economy: Worse & Worser

Today's global economic debacle shares a disturbing number of similarities with the early stages of Japan's "lost decade" of the 1990s.

Without good policy and better luck, the world may well fall into a prolonged period of slow GDP growth, high unemployment, and stagnant living standards like that which unfolded in Japan almost 20 years ago.

 

Today's Global Economic Debacle: The Japan Fallacy

As the United States sinks deeper into recession, many observers fear the country could reprise Japan's "lost decade," the decade of stagnation that followed its mammoth property bubble in the late 1980s. But this fear is unawarranted.

 

Even the United States can Manage Itself into Economic Irrelevance
Chris Thomas

America has been the greatest of all nations for a long time. But we should not forget, especially at a crucial juncture like this, that with enough bad decisions and enough political incompetence, we can indeed manage ourselves into decline.

Deng Undone: China Halts Market Reform

China | Deng Undone: China Halts Market Reform | iHaveNet.com

Since the present Communist Party leadership took power, fresh market-oriented liberalization has been minor. Such policies have been wound down and supplanted by renewed state intervention. In privatization, prices, even foreign trade and investment, the PRC was heading away from the market well before the financial crisis erupted.

 

Why China & U.S. Not Ready to Upgrade Ties

China | Why China & U.S. Not Ready to Upgrade Ties | iHaveNet.com

Calling on the United States and China to do more together has an undeniable logic. Both Washington and Beijing are destined to fail if they attempt to confront the world's problems alone, and the current bilateral relationship is not getting the job done.

But elevating the bilateral relationship is not the solution. It will raise expectations for a level of partnership that cannot be met and exacerbate the very real differences that exist between Washington and Beijing.

Larry Summers: Brilliant Mind, Toxic Ideas
by Arianna Huffington

According to most commentators, the president's press conference went a long way toward taking the spotlight off the roiling anger over AIG, bonuses and Wall Street abuses -- and putting it back where the president wants it: on the imperative need to pass his budget.

But the best laid plans of our remarkable president may be laid to waste by a bank rescue plan that is the product of exhausted ideas put together by men far too beholden to Wall Street.

To understand why a man as brilliant and accomplished as Summers can be so wrong about what to do with the banks and Wall Street, it would be useful to turn to "The Innovator's Dilemma," by Harvard Business School professor Clayton Christensen.

 

Boeing Engineer Gets 15 Years In Economic Espionage
A Chinese-born engineer convicted in the United States' first economic espionage trial was sentenced to more than 15 years in prison for stealing sensitive information on the U.S. space program with the intent of passing it to China.

Businesses Reluctant To Hire New Workers
The economy looks better this year than it did in 2009 but despite positive economic reports, businesses remain reluctant to hire and financial markets are still jittery. David Wessel of The Wall Street Journal tells Renee Montagne that the economy isn't growing fast enough to create enough businesses that need new workers.

U.S. Security Now Hinges On European Financial Crisis
A year ago, the U.S. intelligence community's "threat assessment" identified the global financial crisis as the number one near-term threat to national security. This year's assessment found that the global economy less threatening, but it did highlight one notable development: Economic problems in Europe are now more worrisome than in the developing world, a reversal of the pattern of recent years. NPR's Tom Gjelten reports.

The Super Bowl Stock Market Predictor
The Super Bowl Stock Market Predictor holds that if a team from the old NFL wins, the market will rise in that year; if a team from the old AFL wins, the market will fall. In 1990 two researchers found that the predictor was accurate 91 percent of the time. A member of Washington and Lee University's finance faculty, George Kester, has completed a new study that finds that the predictor's accuracy has fallen slightly to 77 percent. He speaks with host Liane Hansen.

Small Relief In Job Numbers
The January jobs report showed the economy losing 20,000 jobs, but there was some good news. The unemployment rate actually declined last month. Monthly job losses have declined sharply from a year ago, but employers are still very reluctant to hire additional workers.

Paulson Calls For More Financial Regulatory Power
The economy was on the verge of collapse in 2008 when the federal government stepped in to shore up the financial system. Former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who was at the center of those efforts, says the government still needs better tools to prevent another crisis.

World Markets Slide, But Dow Finishes Above 10,000
The stock market ended a fractious day narrowly mixed and suffered its fourth straight losing week amid another series of troubling economic signals. The Dow Jones industrials, down nearly 170 in the afternoon, closed up 10, or 0.1 percent, at 10,012.

Decline In Consumer Borrowing Slows
Americans borrowed less for an 11th consecutive month in December, paying off credit cards while increasing borrowing for cars and other products. Total borrowing dropped by $1.8 billion — far less than the revised $10.6 billion drop for November, and below the $9 billion decrease analysts had expected.

Jobless Rate Falls To 9.7 Percent
The U.S. unemployment rate fell to 9.7 percent in January, down from 10 percent the month earlier. Still, government figures show the economy lost another 20,000 jobs last month.

The Economics Of Snowstorms
A winter storm hitting the mid-Atlantic region Friday and Saturday has already garnered nicknames including "snowpocalypse" and "snowmaggedon." The National Weather Service's forecast of 1-2 feet of snow has led to school and office closings, canceled flights and a run on grocery stores. Scott Bernhardt, chief operating officer of Planalytics, a company that studies the impact of weather, discusses the costs and benefits of a snowstorm.

Greece Debt Problems May Pose Systemic Risk
Stock markets in the U.S. and Europe have taken a beating in recent days because of worries about the debt crisis in Greece, Portugal, Spain and some other European countries. Financial Times reporter Stacy-Marie Ishmael says while they may seem like small players in the global economy, they are not.

Jobless Rate Unexpectedly Drops To 9.7 Percent
The report hinted at some job market improvement, even though employers shed 20,000 jobs in January.

World Markets Drop Over Worries About Debt, Jobs
Stocks in Asia and Europe tumbled today over investor concerns about a weak U.S. job market and a debt crisis in Greece that could spread to other countries. Today's slide comes on the heels of Wall Street's worst day in seven months, following news of an uptick in unemployment claims.

Help For Small Businesses: Examining The Options
Renee Montagne talks with Karen Mills, head of the Small Business Administration, about how small businesses are faring, credit challenges, and efforts to renew federal funding and other measures to make it easier for entrepreneurs to borrow money.

Unemployment Rate Falls, But Job Losses Continue
The Labor Department on Friday said U.S. employers cut 20,000 jobs last month — but the unemployment rate fell to 9.7 percent.

NPR Topics: Economy
NPR news on the U.S. and world economy, the World Bank, and Federal Reserve. Commentary on economic trends. Subscribe to NPR Economy podcasts and RSS feeds.

 

Correction: World trade

In “Fading trading” (January 30th) we said that rich countries’ GDP shrank by 3.2% in 2010. We meant 2009. Sorry. This has been corrected online.

...

Economics focus: Diversity training

Some developing economies are rich but crude, while others are poor but sophisticated

ONCE a sleepy fishing port, the industrial city of Yanbu, on Saudi Arabia’s Red Sea coast, is now a monument to the country’s efforts to diversify its economy. Its petrochemical plant is a sprawling palace of pipes. Propane tanks and cracking towers shimmer in the heat like domes and minarets. The facility’s engineers live with their families nearby in a leafy enclave, their shady balconies reminiscent of the traditional rowshan windows of old Jeddah. At the local mall, shoppers can buy any flavour of Holsten Pils they like (strawberry, apple, pomegranate), so long as it is non-alcoholic.

Like many developing countries, Saudi Arabia has long struggled to wean itself off its dependence on a handful of commodities, in this case oil. Yanbu was built by a royal commission, set up in 1975 as part of a concerted effort to move the Saudi economy beyond crude into downstream industries, such as refined petroleum and petrochemicals. The policy has enjoyed some success: Saudi petrochemical exports exceeded $14 billion in 2008. The kingdom is more ambivalent about some of its other forays. It is, for example, now phasing out efforts to grow wheat in the desert. ...

Norway's pension fund: Passive aggressive

A row over the world’s second-largest sovereign fund revives an old debate

SELDOM has a school of thought fallen from grace as fast as that of “efficient markets”, the concept that asset prices already reflect all available information. Yet despite the crisis, the ideas of the Chicago School are still at the centre of a row over the management of the world’s second-largest sovereign-wealth fund.

The Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global, which is more commonly known as Norway’s petroleum fund, looks after some 2.6 trillion Norwegian krone ($444 billion) in savings from royalties on the country’s oil and gas reserves in the North Sea. The fund, which Norway is saving for a rainy day, is already about the size of the national economy and will probably double within about a decade. ...

Longevity swaps: Live long and prosper

Plans are afoot to create a new capital market in longevity risk

DEATH comes to everyone. The timing is much less certain. Longevity risk, the risk that people will live longer than expected, weighs heavily on those who run pension schemes and on insurers that provide annuities. Actuaries have a track record of systematically underestimating gains in life expectancy, and more old people means a bigger bill for benefits providers. Every additional year of life expectancy at age 65 is reckoned to bump up the present value of pension liabilities in British defined-benefit schemes by 3%, or GBP30 billion ($48 billion).

Demand for ways to offload longevity risk is increasing, particularly in Britain, which has lots of annuities and defined-benefit pensions. Solvency 2, a pending set of rules governing European insurers, is one source of pressure: it will force annuity providers to hold more capital against unhedged longevity risk. Pension schemes, fed up with filling in deficits only to see them widen again, are desperate to manage away as much risk as they can. Many schemes have now hedged against interest-rate movements and inflation; longevity is the next thing on the list. ...

Buttonwood: Stimulating debate

The markets, and developed economies, are too dependent on government action

AS JANUARY goes, so goes the year. That old stockmarket saying does not augur well for 2010, given that the MSCI World index fell by 4.2% in the month, the biggest decline since February 2009, and emerging markets dropped by 5.6%.

Although markets rallied a bit in early February on better-than-expected economic data, the poor start to the year reflected an inherent contradiction to the rebound of 2009. That rally seemed to be dependent both on extraordinary stimulus measures by governments and central banks, and on a vigorous economic recovery. But both cannot co-exist for long: either the recovery will not last or, if it does, the stimulus will be taken away. ...

Carbon markets after Copenhagen: Don't hold your breath

Why hasn’t the carbon price fallen further?

SOMETHING curious has been happening in the carbon markets. They are entirely political creations—even the most inventive financial engineers would not, on their own, have come up with the idea of a difference in value between the air people breathe in and the air they breathe out. Yet traders seem pretty uninterested in political cues. At the chaotic end of the Copenhagen climate summit in December, prices in the largest market in carbon-dioxide emissions, the European Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), did drop from €14.60 ($20.50) to €12.70. But that still left the price of a tonne of carbon dioxide comfortably above its lowest level last year.

The Democrats’ subsequent Senate-election loss in Massachusetts, which dealt a crippling blow to the prospects of an American cap-and-trade system that would have greatly expanded world carbon markets, had even less effect. And the announcement this week of the commitments to carbon reduction that countries were willing to accept under the Copenhagen “accord” caused scarcely a ripple. ...

China's financial system: Red mist

Who matters in the world’s second-largest financial system is barely understood

FROM being a rounding error a decade ago, the financial clout of China now trails only that of America. By market capitalisation, it has three of the four largest banks, the two largest insurance companies, the second-largest stockmarket and a lengthening list of investment funds. Yet who makes the decisions in China is barely understood. The government and the Communist Party are intimately entwined with the managers of China’s financial institutions. Working out who is really in charge is almost impossible.

Even attempting to do so takes you into sensitive territory. Disclosing information about how the Chinese government works risks violating nebulous secrecy laws or sacrificing business opportunities. Many China-watchers will only speak face to face, concerned about using e-mails or phone calls to discuss what, in the West, would be standard chatter about the status of bankers and their supervisors. ...

American mortgages: Return to lender

Mortgage lenders’ past sins catch up with them

DURING the boom, American banks spent surplus profits on share buybacks. Now they are being forced into repurchases of a nastier kind: securitised mortgages whose flaws allow buyers to toss them back to the original lender.

Keenest to ensure that the banks own up to their past sins are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the housing agencies that bought or guaranteed many of the loans. Their stock of seriously delinquent mortgages is rising sharply and stands at $300 billion. Now majority-owned by the government, they are under pressure to claw back every dollar possible for taxpayers—hence the hordes of employees poring over loans for signs of irregularities, such as false income statements by borrowers or second-home buyers posing as owner-occupiers. ...

Unpaid in Manhattan: Stuyvesant Town in default

WHEN it was built in 1947, Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village in New York was seen as an emblem of affordable housing for war veterans and public-sector workers. Later it became an inner-city oasis for the middle classes. Now it is a symbol of the housing bubble. Tishman Speyer and BlackRock splashed out $5.4 billion for the 80-acre (32-hectare) estate in 2006. The market soon tanked. They then lost a legal battle to raise controlled rents to market levels. This week, after defaulting on loans, they agreed to hand the keys to creditors, some of which stand to lose a lot more than the two lead investors. The complex is now worth an estimated $1.9 billion.

...

Hedge funds and private equity: Off target

Some will benefit from curbs on the banks

FEW politicians have a good word for hedge funds and private equity. In the European Union, the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, which attempts to bring the two industries into the regulatory net, is lumbering through the system. And Barack Obama’s new plan to rein in the banks clearly sees their direct involvement in the two sectors as a source of unjustifiable risk.

It is still not clear precisely what the American administration intends to do. Mr Obama said on January 21st: “Banks will no longer be allowed to own, invest or sponsor hedge funds, private-equity funds or proprietary-trading operations for their own profit unrelated to serving their customers.” At first sight, the “sponsorship” clause might seem to apply to prime brokers, the bank divisions which supply hedge funds with finance, back-office and trade-execution support, investment advice, technology and a whole lot more. Todd Groome, chairman of the Alternative Investment Management Association, an industry-lobby group, says “the language is quite broad-brush.” ...

Greek government bonds: My big fat sell-off

A successful bond issue provides only temporary respite

THE Greek finance minister, George Papaconstantinou, must feel like a man who finds a one-euro coin on the pavement only to discover he had earlier dropped a five-euro note. Worries about Greece’s public finances seemed to recede on January 25th when it raised €8 billion ($11 billion) in an issue of five-year bonds. That appeared to kill the idea that Greece may not be able to tap bond markets for much-needed cash. Yet two days later the yields on Greek government bonds jumped to their highest since 1999. The sell-off renewed fears that markets may lose faith in Greece altogether. Talk of a bail-out by its euro-zone partners is growing.

The country’s initial fundraising success came at a hefty price. The new five-year bonds will pay a coupon of 6.2%, a 3.5 percentage-point spread over the “mid-swaps” rate, a yardstick for creditworthy borrowers of euros. Yet the deal suggested there is appetite for risky sovereign bonds at the right price. The bank syndicate placing the bonds was able to drum up €25 billion-worth of orders in a few hours. ...

Regulating banks: Garrottes and sticks

The first of four articles on the implications of the Volcker rule examines reactions on Wall Street

A RECENT episode of “Mad Money” on CNBC, a financial-news network, featured the “Lloyd Blankfein pinata”. Hung from the studio ceiling to symbolise the beating that bankers—not least Goldman Sachs’s boss—have been taking lately at the hands of politicians, the effigy rained down fake gold coins when split apart.

Wall Street’s predicament is the inverse of the one it faced in late 2008, says Frederick Cannon of Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, a broking firm. Then, officials wheeled out weekly plans to save banks. Now they are rushing out measure after measure to punish the survivors, accompanied by increasingly fiery rhetoric. Barack Obama kept up the assault in his State of the Union address this week. Admitting that the bank bail-out was “as popular as a root canal”, he vowed to take on lobbyists who were “already trying to kill” financial reform. ...

Financing solar power: A lighter burden

A promising way to defray the cost of going green

SWITCHING to solar power may help to save the planet. Homeowners, however, aren’t so sure it will save them money. Energy costs may be lower than their existing electricity bills, but the initial expense of installing solar panels puts many people off.

Enter the city of Berkeley, California, which has just completed a pilot programme in which it lends homeowners the money to put panels on their houses. The owners repay the loans over a period of years through an extra charge on their local property-tax bills. The city raised the money to lend by issuing a Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) bond, a type of financing geared specifically to making properties more energy-efficient. In the past year 13 states have adopted legislation enabling municipalities and finance companies to issue PACE bonds. Another, Arizona, has a law pending. Berkeley’s scheme is the only one so far directed exclusively at solar power. ...

Buttonwood: Not what they meant

The unintended consequences of past financial reforms

BARACK OBAMA’S new plan for the banks is unlikely to achieve his stated aim that “Never again will the American taxpayer be held hostage by a bank that is too big to fail.” But whether or not the proposed measures fall short of that ambitious goal, one thing is sure. If the plan is implemented, it will have unintended consequences. That has been the history of previous financial reforms.

Take Regulation Q, a rule established by the American authorities in the 1930s to restrict the interest rate that banks could pay on deposits. It had several motives, including a desire to boost banks’ profits (and thereby help pay for deposit insurance) and a belief that competition to pay high deposit rates would encourage banks to take too many risks. The rule was extended to thrifts (savings-and-loans institutions) in the 1960s. ...

Obama's economics team: New plan, new people?

Presentation, not policy, may be the undoing of Tim Geithner

ONE of the uncertainties about Barack Obama’s abrupt shift on bank regulation is what it implies for his core economics team, especially Larry Summers, his chief adviser in the White House, and Tim Geithner, the treasury secretary. Both men were long sceptical of the feasibility and wisdom of ideas put forward by Paul Volcker, a former chairman of the Federal Reserve. The White House’s adoption of the “Volcker rule” has fuelled chatter that their influence is waning as Mr Obama becomes less friendly to Wall Street.

Much of that speculation is misplaced. The Volcker rule may have looked like a reaction to the Democrats’ loss of a once-safe Senate seat in Massachusetts. Insiders insist, however, that Mr Geithner and Mr Summers were not suddenly sidelined but gradually persuaded of the merits of limiting banks’ activities. As the scale of banks’ profits provided evidence of the implicit subsidy in proprietary trading, and as luminaries from Mervyn King of the Bank of England to Stanley Fischer of the Bank of Israel urged more radical action, so Mr Volcker’s ideas gained momentum. ...

World trade: Fading trading

After a sharp revival, global trade growth is slowing again

IN, OUT, shake it all about. Last year was a terrible one overall for global trade. Volumes fell by 14.4%, according to the World Bank. But that figure masks whipsawing activity throughout the year. The Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis reckons that the volume of world exports fell by 10.6% in the first quarter of 2009, grew only slightly in the second and bounced by 3.5% in the third quarter. Bernard Hoekman, director of the bank’s trade group, says the three months to September saw a “sharp V-shaped recovery”.

There are two worries to spoil this improving picture. One is what happened after the third quarter. Mr Hoekman believes that there was a “distinct slowdown” in the pace of recovery towards the end of 2009. Preliminary figures suggest that the volume of world trade expanded by just 1.1% in November, less than the October increase of 1.4% and much less than the 5.4% rise in September. The bank reckons that the value of world trade (which is also affected by price and exchange-rate fluctuations) fell slightly in November. A rebound in shipments in and out of some of the world’s busiest ports also faded (see chart). Why would the resurgence have fizzled? The best explanation is that third-quarter growth was buoyed by the rebuilding of inventories, which were slashed in the depths of the crisis. That effect may have ebbed. ...

Tackling deflation in Japan: Can Kan?

A new finance minister wants the Bank of Japan to target inflation

THE situation has “completely changed,” says an ebullient Keisuke Tsumura, an elected official in the newish government’s Cabinet Office. The Bank of Japan (BoJ) “has redefined its understanding of price stability. Some market participants now regard it as de facto inflation-targeting.”

That would be something to get excited about. Since the start of Japan’s deflationary era in 1999, the BoJ has stoutly resisted calls to set an inflation target against which it can be judged—and by which it can be embarrassed if it misses. Its inflation objective is defined in the loosest terms, as a rate between zero and 2%, with no time-frame to achieve it and no penalty for failure. ...

Economics focus: From bail-out to bail-in

In a guest article, Paul Calello (pictured left), the head of Credit Suisse’s investment bank, and Wilson Ervin, its former chief risk officer, propose a new process for resolving failing banks

WHAT should policymakers do when faced with the potential failure of a large bank? In 2008 officials had to choose between taxpayer bail-outs (bad) or systemic financial collapse (probably worse). Various ideas to make finance safer, like contingent capital and living wills, are circulating today. But the central issue of bank resolution, perhaps the most vexing aspect of the financial crisis, has not been clearly addressed.

A “bail-in” process for bank resolution is a potentially powerful “third option” that confronts this problem head-on. It would give officials the authority to force banks to recapitalise from within, using private capital, not public money. The concept builds on time-tested procedures that have been used to keep airlines flying and industrial firms going even as their capital structures were being reorganised. It accelerates those procedures to address the unique circumstances of financial firms operating in today’s fast-moving markets. If done correctly it should strengthen market discipline on banks and reduce the potential for systemic risk. ...

American banks: Through FICC and thin

A possible end to the pain for lenders

POLITICIANS tend to tar all bankers with the same brush. The results unveiled this week by America’s financial giants were, however, far from uniform. Citigroup and Bank of America (BofA) posted thumping quarterly losses. Morgan Stanley eked out a modest gain. Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase made healthy profits. Goldman Sachs was expected to report a glittering set of numbers as The Economist went to press.

The differences were partly down to one-off hits. Citi, for instance, had to swallow $6.2 billion in after-tax charges related to repayment of its federal bail-out funds. Behind the noise, however, some trends are emerging. Loan losses appear to be stabilising. For some, the worst may even be over. At BofA, America’s biggest lender, net write-offs fell by 13% in the fourth quarter, the first decrease in nearly four years. Across the industry, credit-card delinquencies are flattening out. ...

The Economist: Finance and economics
Finance and economics

 

Copenhagen talks enter 'new phase'
Copenhagen climate conference enters a 'new phase' as ministers join in intensive negotiations to deliver an agreement by the end of the week, the president of the meeting says

Obama presses banks to boost lending
President Obama told the US's top bankers that they had a 'special responsibility' to help spur on the economic recovery after they received government bail-outs last year, urging them to increase lending to small businesses and mortgage refinancing

Darling defies threats on bonus tax
The chancellor has warned he will not water down his 50 per cent supertax on bonuses or offer special deals after brokers and banks threatened to move staff out of the UK

Clouds mar Europe's sunnier outlook
Prospects have brightened noticeably since August, when the map was last published, with northern Europe capturing the best of the light. A robust recovery in Germany and evidence of a clear turnaround in France have helped

Fed to split monetary and liquidity policy
The Federal Reserve is unlikely to make any big changes to its monetary policy stance at the conclusion of its December meeting on Wednesday, though there is a chance it could make some alterations to its provision of liquidity

Greece moves on costs and corruption
The Athens stock market lost 1.2 per cent in early trading as investors absorbed news of the Greek government's plan to reduce the country's budget deficit

US banks to repay rescue funds
Citigroup and Wells Fargo unveiled plans to sell a total of up to $30bn in stock and return a combined $45bn to US taxpayers in a move that will free them from heightened government supervision but could hit shareholders

Japan business confidence remains low
Business morale improves more slowly in the fourth quarter and large manufacturers surveyed by the central bank plan record cuts in capital spending as a strong yen threatens a fragile economic recovery

China eclipses US in initial public offferings
Chinese stock exchanges raised double the amount of money secured by IPOs across the US showing how activity is shifting from west to east

Pipeline brings Asian gas to China
The first pipeline bringing central Asian natural gas to China opened, underscoring Beijing's importance to the former Soviet republics. China's president, Hu Jintao, joined counterparts from Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan for the ceremony

Rich nations step up pressure on Beijing
Developed countries are putting the Chinese delegation under intense and co-ordinated pressure. The harder line has come about partly since they suspect China of using the G77 group of 130 developing nations to advance its agenda

White House predicts jobs growth
The US economy will be creating jobs by the spring, the White House predicted for the first as the President prepares to meet chief executives from twelve of the US's largest banks to increase the pressure on them to lend to small business

Nobel laureate who turned economics into a science dies
No economist alive is unmarked by the work of Paul Anthony Samuelson, who did more than any other theorist to turn economics from a scattered selection of insights into a social science

UNDP calls for capital controls in Asia
Asian economies have been urged to put in place stronger regulatory systems to prevent asset bubbles in equity and property markets wreaking havoc in the wake of the global financial crisis

For Congress, debt vote is an unwanted gift
Unless Congress votes before Christmas to raise the US government debt ceiling from $12,100bn to nearly $14,000bn, the US government will have to stop work in a matter of weeks

FT.com - International economy
FT.com - International economy

 

The Best Paragraph I've Read on the State of Economics
Maxine Udall makes a point I've often made, though in a way I wish I had phrased it:

Now add to this the promotion and tenure policies at even second rate economics departments that require and only reward publication in journals that favor morally vacant, mathematically rigorous, theoretically obtuse existence proofs that more often than not bear no relation to reality as we know it. One is then left with an economics literature that few people, including some who have majored in economics as undergrads, can truly understand, either in its content or in its relevance to the important moral and economic issues that confront us today.
Udall, in my view erroneously, believes that a 'reality-based' economics would be more Keynesian:
Keynes, who advocated that government play a role in moderating the effects of peaks and troughs in the business cycle through regulation of investment banking and automatic demand stabilizers (for example, unemployment compensation and jobs creation through public works) became conflated (perhaps intentionally) with "socialism" and "communism."...

Economics, mathematized and divorced from moral philosophy, was effectively neutered after WW II, at the point when its relevance to "serious economic argument" might have been established and developed. The outcome was perfectly aligned with market forces that would continue to shift the national narrative in ways that would finally succeed in convincing people that "government is the problem". It culminated in repeal of Great Depression era regulation, thereby freeing investment bankers for unfettered speculative gains supported by a seemingly unfettered single-payer credit default safety net.
Which is all fine and good, except for the fact that for Keynesian fiscal stimulus to work you need to waive away a number of real world complications. Non-mathematical theories can " bear no relation to reality as we know it" as well.

Udall also states:
World War II provided the massive Keynesian stimulus needed to haul us out of depression and to cement Keynes ideas about the roles that government could and should play both during economic downturns and to prevent them.
This neglects to take into account the evidence that U.S. military and foreign spending did not go up until 2 years of rapid U.S. economic growth.

The Best Paragraph I've Read on the State of Economics originally appeared on About.com Economics on Monday, February 8th, 2010 at 12:10:53.

Permalink | Comment | Email this

Climate Research vs. Economics Research

Craig Newmark posts an excerpt from a Andrew Simms column:

Orthodox economics is based on simplifications that so distort the real world as to make it unrecognisable, yet its basic tenets are credulously repeated on an almost daily basis in national newspapers and on television news. A genuinely evidence-based approach to economic policymaking would not produce a system remotely like the one we have, the business-as-usual version that many climate sceptics seem so eager to defend. Given its task, the vast range of subjects covered, the thousands of scientists involved, and the sheer size of its reports, what's stunning about the IPCC's work is that comparing it to any economic analysis used to actually run the world is like comparing the complete Oxford English Dictionary to a guide to slang published by the Sunday Sport.

Newmark's reaction?

That's really a low blow. Mandatory two-point deduction. Your next foul, sir, you will have to forfeit the fight.

My reaction?

Simms has a point.

More specifically - there is a lot of really good applied economics research out there that uses realistic assumptions, real world data and produces useful outcomes. Then there are theory papers which are nothing but mathematics posing as economics. Models with assumptions such as:

  • Heterogeneous agents.
  • Absurd market demand curves (e.g. Demand is a constant r until the price p_r then it falls to zero.
  • Input prices that do not vary with demand.
  • No production externalities. Ever.
  • Agents with perfect information (they know the cost structure, strategies and inventory levels of their competitors).
  • Zero transaction costs.
  • Long run marginal cost curves with a single local minimum.

That's just off the top of my head. I should crack open an issue of Econometrica and find hundreds more.

A fan of Milton Friedman's The Methodology of Positive Economics would respond that it does not matter how absurd the assumptions seem. All that matters is how valid and accurate the model's predictions are. But since most economics models (particularly in macroeconomics) are not easily directly testable nor easily falsifiable, I question how much value we should place on a model with absurd assumptions.

Climate Research vs. Economics Research originally appeared on About.com Economics on Tuesday, February 2nd, 2010 at 07:57:14.

Permalink | Comment | Email this

Marginal Utility in Economics
I get quite a few questions on marginal utility, so I thought I'd create a primer for those of you who are completely new to economics. Please see: Marginal Utility in Economics.

Marginal Utility in Economics originally appeared on About.com Economics on Monday, February 1st, 2010 at 18:10:24.

Permalink | Comment | Email this

Why Is There So Much Esoteric Math in Economics Grad Programs?

Stephen Gordon asks a question I continually asked myself as a Ph.D. student at the University of Rochester:

Why does anyone care about the distinction between convergence in probability and almost sure convergence?

I'm teaching two econometrics classes this term (master's and PhD), and I just covered the parts on asymptotic theory. In both lectures, I stumbled badly at explaining the difference between these two forms of convergence: my heart simply isn't in it...

I've never heard of empirical study where the distinction between the two forms of convergence made a difference...

Why do we force our students to learn these things?

As an aside, undergraduates in economics are often surprised how little economics there is in graduate programs outside of fields courses such as Labor Economics and Public Finance.

Although from an empirical perspective it probably doesn't make sense in the slightest to worry about the distinction between the two types of convergence, I am quite certain it makes a difference in theory papers. Unlike most economists, I tend to use 'theory paper' in a pejorative sense, because too many theory papers:

  1. Make assumptions that cannot possibly be true and are not reasonable simplifications of the 'real world'.

  2. Are non-falsifiable, do not make predictions, or have so many free parameters they can be used to predict anything.

You need to know this math in order to be able to publish 'theory papers'. The larger question should be, "why does the economics profession put any value on this work?"

Why Is There So Much Esoteric Math in Economics Grad Programs? originally appeared on About.com Economics on Friday, January 29th, 2010 at 07:56:32.

Permalink | Comment | Email this

A Public Health Problem That Can't Be Solved With a Pigovian Tax or Sin Tax

From Reuters:

Shaving 3 grams off the daily salt intake of Americans could prevent up to 66,000 strokes, 99,000 heart attacks and 92,000 deaths in the United States, while saving $24 billion in health costs per year, researchers reported on Wednesday...

Salt, which contributes to high blood pressure and heart disease, is widely overused in the United States, with 75 to 80 percent coming from processed food. Men typically consume 10.4 grams per day. For women, the average is 7.3 grams. Its use is rising.

A reduction of 1 gram would prevent 11,000 to 23,000 strokes, 18,000 to 35,000 heart attacks and 15,000 to 32,000 deaths from any cause, the researchers reported in New England Journal of Medicine.

My stock answer is to proclaim Sin Tax!, however that would not work here, for a couple of reasons:

  1. Assuming the Reuters article means salt and not sodium, I would guess that a sin tax would have to be at least 10 cents a gram to have any noticable impact. That would make the tax on a 1kg box of Sifto table salt that currently sells for $1.69 equal to $100. Not going to happen.

  2. Memories of Gandhi's Salt March

I am not sure what the answer is - but here the answer is almost certainly not a sin tax or Pigovian tax.

A Public Health Problem That Can't Be Solved With a Pigovian Tax or Sin Tax originally appeared on About.com Economics on Thursday, January 28th, 2010 at 15:25:37.

Permalink | Comment | Email this

Income Elasticity and the Sex Trade
Price Elasticity of Demand is the most well-known of all the elasticities in economics. Income Elasticity of Demand, however, is equally as important when considering how the demand for a product and service changes over time (due to economic growth or the business cycle). The Toronto Star has an unusual article on income elasticity: Recession means tough times for sex workers. (Note: article may not be safe for work).

Income Elasticity and the Sex Trade originally appeared on About.com Economics on Thursday, January 28th, 2010 at 12:08:20.

Permalink | Comment | Email this

Can Exports Get the U.S. Out of Their Slump?

From Mark Thoma:

The problem is that if (net) exports don't lead the way, then consumption or investment must fill the void if the private sector is going to take care of this on its own. But neither of those seems likely to grow fast enough to accomplish this, at least not anytime soon, and there's some question whether they will return to their pre-crisis levels, consumption growth in particular.

Paul Krugman's point -- the quote is from a bit over a year ago -- was that if consumption, investment, and net exports can't support the growth we need to maintain employment, then government must use aggressive measures to bridge the gap until the private sector can make the necessary adjustments.

On the surface, this logic seems to make sense. In economics 101 we learn that the size of the economy is calculated through the following equation:

Y = C + I + G + (X - M), where

C = consumption

I = Investment

G = Government Spending

(X - M) = Net Exports (eXports - iMports)

If C and I cannot grow 'fast enough', then the growth needs to come from government spending (G) or exports (X) (or a drop in imports).

The problem with this logic is it confuses an accounting identity for an economic model. There is an implicit ceteris paribus assumption in the Thoma/Krugman argument suggests that if X rises, it will not cause changes to any of the other variables. It is fairly straight forward to think of two scenarios where a rise in X will be offset by a decrease in another variable:

  1. American companies ship products to Canada that otherwise would have been consumed domestically. X up, C down.

  2. American companies ship products to Canada. Canadians demand U.S. dollars to pay for those goods. U.S. dollar rises vis-a-vis the loonie. Canadian goods now relatively cheaper to Americans, who increase their imports of Canadian goods. X up, M up which offsets (partially or fully) the rise in X.

To be clear - I am not suggesting that increased exports will not increase U.S. economic growth. But you cannot determine that from this analysis. Confusing an accounting identity with an economic model is an elementary mistake - I'm surprised a Nobel Prize winner would fall into that trap.

Can Exports Get the U.S. Out of Their Slump? originally appeared on About.com Economics on Thursday, January 28th, 2010 at 07:58:08.

Permalink | Comment | Email this

Good Thing We Had All That Stimulus

Mark Thoma linked to some terrific data from the Dallas Fed which shows just how awful the labor market has been during this recession, relative to past recessions. Greg Mankiw has a terrific graph showing that the labor market is far worse than what the Obama team predicted would happen without any stimulus.

It would be reasonable to conclude that the stimulus has been useless at best and counterproductive at worst which is exactly what I predicted would happen. There are, of course, other explanations. Given that U.S. labor market is in a worse position than the 'no stimulus' prediction, it is difficult to argue that the problem with the stimulus is that it was too small. Of course the usual suspects will continue to argue just that.

Good Thing We Had All That Stimulus originally appeared on About.com Economics on Thursday, January 28th, 2010 at 07:47:24.

Permalink | Comment | Email this

Health Costs and Medical Conditions

My colleague Mary Hartley with some data I do not believe I had seen before:

On average, "obese people spend $1400 more a year on health care compared to someone of normal weight," says Eric Finkelstein, the foremost authority on the economics of obesity in the United States. And whether you, your employer, or the government picks up the tab, obesity is running up the health care bill.

I know I have been beating this drum for some time, but it would seem to me that increasing taxes on "junk food" and using the revenue to decrease income taxes is as close to a free lunch as you will ever see in economics. The population will get healthier, health care costs will decrease and economic growth will rise due to lower income taxes.

Now, this will not solve all of America's health care issues:

But just so you know, obesity-related health conditions account for only 9.1 percent of the $4.3 trillion dollars spent on health care last year.

I believe that reducing these expenses by 20% is not unreasonable. This would be a savings of 80 billion dollars - not an insignificant sum. But we do not have to stop there as I have argued before. Related policies include:

  • Increased 'sin taxes' on alcohol and tobacco.

  • Pigovian taxes on air pollution.

  • With the added revenue from 1 through 3, increase transfers to the poor (through, say, an guaranteed annual income. Poverty is a source of early mortality, so by fighting poverty we also improve health outcomes). Use the rest to finance tax cuts to corporate income and income tax rates.

Economics shows that we have the opportunity to increase health and reduce health care expenses - now all we need is a politician brave enough to suggest it.

Health Costs and Medical Conditions originally appeared on About.com Economics on Thursday, January 28th, 2010 at 07:28:49.

Permalink | Comment | Email this

Is Fiscal Stimulus Science or Faith?

A continuation of: Brad DeLong Realizes The Stimulus Didn't Work - And Draws Entirely The Wrong Conclusion.

We had extensive fiscal stimulus and the economy is in worse shape than the 'here is what will happen if we do not implement fiscal stimulus' projections.

That does not necessarily mean that fiscal stimulus does not work. However, can there ever be a possible piece of evidence that shows fiscal stimulus does not work? Seems to me that any outcome can be spun as showing the effectiveness (or for that matter the non-effectiveness) of fiscal stimulus. That is, the fiscal stimulus hypothesis is non-falsifiable. The true believers will never stop believing.

Even though fiscal stimulus does not work in theory and there is no evidence it works in practice, trying to disprove the effectiveness of fiscal stimulus feels a little like trying to disprove that God exists. It makes me question how scientific macroeconomics truly is.

Is Fiscal Stimulus Science or Faith? originally appeared on About.com Economics on Thursday, January 21st, 2010 at 12:44:45.

Permalink | Comment | Email this

About.com Economics
Get the latest headlines from the About.com Economics GuideSite.

 

Wayne Allyn Root's "Lessons Obama Should Have Learned From Watching the Super Bowl"

My favorite 2008 Libertarian Party vice presidential nominee is back with another searing indictment of his former Columbia classmate, with an oddsmaking twist. Excerpt:

Never forget!#2) Taking risks is central to success. The Saints pulled the huge Super Bowl upset by taking a huge gamble. Their onside kick to start the second half was the key play of the game- and one of the most daring calls in Super Bowl history. Obama doesn't understand how important risk-taking is to success in life. [...]

#3) Sports gambling (and all forms of online gaming) needs to be legalized. Our country is bankrupt. We need to use Nevada as a role model for the nation and legalize, regulate and tax "sin," like any other business. Legalizing medical marijuana and online gaming has the potential to bring in $300 billion in new tax revenues. That could pay down government debts, or allow us to lower taxes for our hardworking American taxpayers. [...]

#5) Government wastes our money. During the Super Bowl I witnessed a perfect example of why our government is broke and failing...and why only the private sector can save our economy. I saw a TV ad created by the federal government. It was an advertisement for the U.S. Census Bureau. It was stale, stupid and ineffective. But worse, it wasted $2 million of taxpayer money. Yes, that ad cost $2 MM of your money. For what? This is how government wastes your money every hour of every day. It's easy to waste a million here…and a million there, when it's not your money. Remember that joke about the difference between Vegas and D.C. This is a perfect example of government bureaucrats gambling and failing miserably with someone else's money- YOURS.

Whole thing here. Reason's Rootiness here.

Back to the Drawing Board

In just about every speech at their 2008 convention, Democrats promised voters that a change in the White House would, in Barack Obama’s formulation, restore “our moral standing” in the world. Replace the unilateralist cowboy at the top with a humbler multilateralist, and the path would finally be cleared to fix vexing international issues such as curbing carbon emissions and dealing with the mullahs in Iran. Like many of the party faithful’s long-nurtured beliefs, this hope has disintegrated on contact with reality.

“America is losing the free world,” said a January headline in the Financial Times. While that statement is exaggerated, the sentiment behind it has been gaining traction around the globe, especially in the wake of the climate conference debacle in Copenhagen. It’s not just that the less confrontational American president has been unable to deliver results. He can’t even get his phone calls returned.

“On the last day of the [Copenhagen] talks, the Americans tried to fix up one-to-one meetings between Mr Obama and the leaders of South Africa, Brazil and India—but failed each time,” Gideon Rachman wrote in the Financial Times piece. “The Indians even said that their prime minister, Manmohan Singh, had already left for the airport. So Mr Obama must have felt something of a chump when he arrived for a last-minute meeting with Wen Jiabao, the Chinese prime minister, only to find him already deep in negotiations with the leaders of none other than Brazil, South Africa and India.”

It was easy for many Democrats to believe, during the nightmare years of “freedom fries,” that George W. Bush alone was to blame for the diplomatic prickliness between, say, Washington and Paris. But the basic conditions for American foreign policy have more to do with America’s outsized position in the world than with any particular politicians. Bill Clinton tangled constantly with the French, and now a visibly irritated President Nicolas Sarkozy has gone within a year from vying for Obama’s attentions to taking (in the words of a competing politician) an openly “anti-Obama position.”

Obama’s approach was supposed to produce a more cooperative Tehran and Moscow, fewer terrorists in the Muslim world, and vast new initiatives to fight global poverty. Instead, Iran has murdered dissenters while speeding up its nuclear program, Russia hasn’t discernibly budged even after the U.S. abandoned its missile shield in the Czech Republic and Poland, a Muslim suicide bomber was stopped at the last minute from blowing up a plane over Detroit on Christmas, and global gatherings have produced even less concrete action than usual.

These developments illustrate a phenomenon that has been playing out across a variety of public policy areas: Progressive Democrats, after being outfoxed by Ronald Reagan, triangulated to the policy margins by Bill Clinton, then routed under the first six years of George W. Bush, are having many of the nostrums they championed during the wilderness years tested in the real world for the first time in decades. The initial results of this long-delayed peer review have been a shock to the progressive system.

The Copenhagen crackup was a dream killer in more ways than one. Not only did the breakdown give the lie to the notion that a cranky Texas oilman was the single greatest impediment to international cooperation and enlightened environmental policy; it laid waste to the argument that yoking the developing world to a “do as we say, not as we did” policy of energy consumption will somehow prove to be an economic and environmental “win-win.” If that’s true, the leaders of India and China—the latter of which has been serially praised for its green-energy initiatives by the likes of New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman—certainly don’t believe it. No amount of international do-goodism is going to prevent countries from acting in what they perceive to be their own self-interest.

Obama and the Democrats have been peddling a similar win-win line about the creation of up to 5 million “green jobs” in America, through a combination of cap-and-trade carbon permits, home weatherization, clean coal, higher gas mileage standards, environmental regulation, and various renewable-energy mandates. The “green jobs” political juggernaut has been credited to Van Jones, who was obliged to resign as Obama’s “Green Czar” last summer after reports surfaced that he’d signed a petition supporting an investigation of Bush’s involvement in 9/11. What’s interesting about Jones’ beautiful-sounding concept is that even its chief supporters admit there’s no evidence the theory is true. Which is hardly surprising, since most of Obama’s proposed environmental policies involve making energy more expensive while using more tax dollars to subsidize expensive clean energy sources. As The New Yorker put it in a long, flattering profile of Jones in January 2009, “the mechanics of creating green jobs—or even what jobs should qualify for the title—have yet to be worked out.”

The debate over these phantom jobs, against a backdrop of double-digit unemployment, will likely suck up the political oxygen in Washington after the protracted health care debate finally wheezes to a close. But Americans already have found empty pots at the end of other Democratic rainbows. 

The $789 billion stimulus package of February 2009, thanks to a theoretical “multiplier” that would convert federal dollars into more than their worth in job creation, was supposed to (according to administration economists) “create or save” 3.5 million jobs and prevent unemployment from reaching as high as 9 percent by the end of 2010. Instead, joblessness shot through the 10 percent barrier before the end of 2009, and the government’s own tracking of the jobs allegedly created or saved has become a laughingstock with its double counting and imaginary ZIP codes.

What about the lobbying scourge that Democrats (like all good opposition parties) opposed so vociferously in 2008? Progressive theory holds that regulation of K Street, as opposed to a cutback in overall regulation, is the key to “change the culture of corruption” in Washington, as candidate Obama repeatedly promised to do. How’d that work out in practice? In December Politico reported that “Washington’s influence industry is on track to shatter last year’s record $3.3 billion spent to lobby Congress and the rest of the federal government—and that’s with a down economy and about 1,500 fewer registered lobbyists in town.”

In the truer-believing regions of the progressive political world, the broad agenda of carbon price hikes, centralized health care, greater regulation, increased taxes, and government-mandated diversity in boardrooms are not just sound and moral policy. They are inherently popular, if only the usual obstacles to justice and reform can be neutralized or removed. Back when he was still considered a plausible stand-in for “the Democratic wing of the Democratic Party” (enough to win 2.7 percent of the presidential vote in 2000, much of it from progressives disgruntled at New Democrat policies), Ralph Nader insisted on a daily basis that his agenda was essentially “majoritarian.”

Such fantasies can serve as a salve when you live on the margins of the policy debate. And as long as you remain on the sidelines, the underlying proposals tend to go largely unchallenged. But now that progressive economic thought has its first real foothold in Washington since the 1970s, many long-marginalized ideas are being dusted off for real-world testing, from taxing stock transactions to “getting people out of their cars.” If we’re lucky, those debates will take place before the ideas are cemented into law. Better yet, maybe the growing unpopularity of central planning will dissuade the enthusiasts from inflicting their experiments on the rest of us in the first place. 

Matt Welch (matt.welch@reason.com) is editor in chief of reason.

Reason.tv: Gary Johnson's Our America—the former NM governor's vision for a truly free country.

 

Former Republican Gov. Gary Johnson was the top elected official in New Mexico from 1994 through 2002. He took office after beating a primary opponent backed by the Republican party and won election twice in a state that has two-to-one Democratic advantage in registration.

Born in 1953 and a one-time competitive skiier, Johnson was not your typical governor. Instead, he governed as fiscally responsible and socially tolerant. He didn't raise taxes at all during his time in office and pushed through an aggressive privatization agenda that reduced costs while improving services. He vetoed 750 bills and trimmed the state workforace by 1,000 positions at the same time. He was also the highest-level elected politician and one of the most vocal proponent of drug legalization during his tenure.

Johnson is now fronting the Our America initiative, which is dedicated to advancing the public debate on topics ranging from immigration to civil liberties to free enterprise to the federal deficit to the war on drugs to Afghanistan and Iraq. He is frequently mentioned as a possible Republican presidential candidate in 2012.

Reason's Matt Welch and Nick Gillespie talked with Johnson about the issues of the day—and what it was like to climb Mt. Everest with a busted leg.

Approximately 10 minutes. Shot by Dan Hayes and Meredith Bragg; edited by Bragg.

Note: This is a condensed version of a longer interview. For the full half-hour version, go here.

Back in 2001, Reason called Johnson "the most dangerous politician in America." Find out why.

Subscribe to Reason.tv's YouTube channel and receive automatic notifications when new videos are posted!

Reason Writers Around Town: Matt Welch Talks Obama on MSNBC

On February 3, Reason Editor in Chief Matt Welch–who, despite rumors to the contrary, is not a "Republican strategist"–appeared on MSNBC to discuss Barack Obama's attempts to reinvigorate the second year of his presidency in the context of economic policies that are genuinely and increasingly unpopular. Approximately six minutes:

The Instability of Monopolies

Yesterday's New York Times carried an interesting op-ed from former Microsoft veep Dick Brass wondering how and why the world's most successful company lost its way. Excerpt:

Innovators in actionMicrosoft has become a clumsy, uncompetitive innovator. Its products are lampooned, often unfairly but sometimes with good reason. Its image has never recovered from the antitrust prosecution of the 1990s. Its marketing has been inept for years; remember the 2008 ad in which Bill Gates was somehow persuaded to literally wiggle his behind at the camera?

While Apple continues to gain market share in many products, Microsoft has lost share in Web browsers, high-end laptops and smartphones. Despite billions in investment, its Xbox line is still at best an equal contender in the game console business. It first ignored and then stumbled in personal music players until that business was locked up by Apple.

Microsoft's huge profits — $6.7 billion for the past quarter — come almost entirely from Windows and Office programs first developed decades ago. Like G.M. with its trucks and S.U.V.'s, Microsoft can't count on these venerable products to sustain it forever.

Read the whole thing to sort out analysis from sour grapes, but I'm more interested in a macro fact about monopolies: Namely, unless they're either run or locked into place by government, they do not last. And even government-run monopolies produce mass consumer defections. (A corollary to the Monopoly Rule is the Dictatorship Rule: totalitarianism, because it produces such unhappiness, is inherently unstable.) Companies that grow bloated on profits squeezed from a seemingly captive audience end up panicking when those consumers wriggle free to buy and even create competing products. Meanwhile, corporate cultures in (temporarily) uncompetitive industries are the very definition of non-innovative, even in technology companies.

The same holds true for companies that aren't technically monopolies, but are able to rack up double-digit profit margins while not having to fend off a mirror-image competitor. Trust me, the L.A. Times was called the "velvet coffin" long before the "corporate bean counters" or Evil Sam Zell showed up. Even areas where market consolidation produces noticeably awful product--I'm thinking here of the 1990s wave of radio consolidation--the combination of disgruntled consumers and liberating technology are able to produce innovative workarounds faster than you can say "theme time radio hour."   

Something to think about as regulators here and abroad start targeting Google (it's amazing to me how seamlessly Google has replaced Microsoft as the demon sheep of technology companies in the eyes of the French, for example), and as the Obama administration mulls ramping up antitrust prosecutions more generally.

Civility Begins in the Heart

The president gave a talk at a prayer breakfast today, and had some words about civility & loving your political enemy:

But there is a sense that something is different now; that something is broken; that those of us in Washington are not serving the people as well as we should.  At times, it seems like we're unable to listen to one another; to have at once a serious and civil debate.  And this erosion of civility in the public square sows division and distrust among our citizens.  It poisons the well of public opinion.  It leaves each side little room to negotiate with the other.  It makes politics an all-or-nothing sport, where one side is either always right or always wrong when, in reality, neither side has a monopoly on truth.  And then we lose sight of the children without food and the men without shelter and the families without health care.

Empowered by faith, consistently, prayerfully, we need to find our way back to civility.  That begins with stepping out of our comfort zones in an effort to bridge divisions.  We see that in many conservative pastors who are helping lead the way to fix our broken immigration system.  It's not what would be expected from them, and yet they recognize, in those immigrant families, the face of God.  We see that in the evangelical leaders who are rallying their congregations to protect our planet.  We see it in the increasing recognition among progressives that government can't solve all of our problems, and that talking about values like responsible fatherhood and healthy marriage are integral to any anti-poverty agenda.  Stretching out of our dogmas, our prescribed roles along the political spectrum, that can help us regain a sense of civility. [...]

Challenging each other's ideas can renew our democracy.  But when we challenge each other's motives, it becomes harder to see what we hold in common.

A few uncivil observations:

1) Why wouldn't a conservative pastor be "expected" to want to improve the country's awful immigration system? Granted, my knowledge of organized religion is pretty minimal, but aren't religious leaders all about the congregation? Don't congregations include people who are separated by bad law from their families, and thus likely to share their pain with their pastors?

2) While recognizing that the Evangelical shift toward global warming policy is a real and newsworthy event, I don't know why a general sense of environmental stewardship wouldn't be "expected" from them, either. God likes grass and clean water and lil' animal friends, right? The Evangelicals I know aren't a bunch of common Fred Smiths.

3) Is the "recognition among progressives that government can't solve all of our problems" really "increasing", and is there anything really new about lefty lectures on fatherhood and marriage? The former is a bit of a straw man to begin with (I'm not sure I've ever met a progressive who thought government could solve all problems); and if you consider the question over a matter of decades, then yes, I'd reckon the trend lines are going in that direction. But recently? Seems to me that government intervention is considerably more popular on the left than it was during Bill Clinton's era, a notion captured well by the two very different approaches to economic policy.

I like the president's call for better understanding between people who have different ideas, and I look forward to him embracing it more fully.

Katherine Mangu-Ward wrote last week about the president's simultaneous calls for more bipartisanship and more GOP-bashing.

All the President's Budget Assumptions

“Another manifestation of irresponsibility is the large budget deficits we are inheriting," wrote President Barack Obama in last year's budget message for fiscal year 2010 (which runs from October 2009 through September 2010). "These deficits, over time, will harm economic growth and impose burdens on our children and grandchildren," he continued. "For the past eight years, in a time of economic growth, the government spent recklessly on tax cuts for the few and hand-outs for the well off and well-connected, mismanaged billions of dollars in taxpayer money, and failed to honor the responsibilities we have to future generations."

Given his firm grasp of the consequences of the situation, you would have thought that the president would cut government spending and try to reduce the deficit. Sadly, the table below shows that you'd be wrong.

Indeed, contrary to the promises Obama made last year, the deficit grew by over 10 percent between FY2009 and FY2010. And spending, which was projected to go down in FY2010 to $3,552 billion from its $3,938 billion FY2009 level, will actually climb by an estimated 6 percent. In total dollars, the deficit for FY2010 is projected by the government to reach $1.56 trillion (last year, Obama projected it would be $1,171 billion).

2009 – 2010 Changes

And what did President Obama request in his recently released budget for FY2011? In his latest budget message he writes:

To help put our country on a fiscally sustainable path, we will freeze non-security discretionary
funding for 3 years. This freeze will require a level of discipline with Americans’ tax dollars and a number of hard choices and painful tradeoffs not seen in Washington for many years. But it is what needs to be done to restore fiscal responsibility as we begin to rebuild our economy.

Here's the rough plan in table form.

FY 2011 Budget Basics

Expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), that means total government outlays will equal 25.1 percent of GDP, the second highest rate since 1945 (the highest was 25.4 percent for FY2010). Federal revenues will amount to 16.8 percent of GDP (up from its 14.8 percent level in FY2010). And the budget deficit will come to 8.3 percent of GDP, down from its FY2010 level. To put that number is perspective, remember that during the 1980s, a decade known for high deficits, the deficit average was 4 percent of GDP.

The only sector where spending might decrease is the area subject to the spending freeze (that area covers 13 percent of the budget, but the freeze won't take effect until next year). Since the budget came out, I have spent a long time trying to figure out how the freeze will work and exactly what it entails. Based on the budget data just released, however, there wasn’t enough information available to answer that question as of this writing.

So much for transparency. As economist and former Congressional Budget Office Acting Director Donald Marron put it on his blog after the budget numbers were released on Tuesday: "To fully understand the trajectory of non-security discretionary spending, you need to consider such obscure bits of budget arcana as the obligation limitations used for transportation funding (ob lims, to the initiated), the proposed conversion of Pell grants from discretionary to mandatory spending, the reassignment of bioshield from security to non-security spending, and the fact that Census spending is particularly high in fiscal 2010 because of the decennial census. I haven’t actually crunched the numbers, but that’s not my point tonight. Instead, my point is simply how hard it can sometimes be to match budget reality to budget communications."

It is also important to note the increase in defense spending (4.1 percent). Such an increase is not surprising, given that Obama is increasing troop levels in Afghanistan without withdrawing troops in Iraq any faster than President Bush would have done. But anyone who thought that Obama would be less of a hawk than his predecessor should have realized by now that this is a myth. In fact, this year the defense budget is the biggest in total real dollars in U.S. history.

So spending is going up. And yet the president predicts the FY2011 deficit will shrink from its FY2010 level of $1.56 trillion to $1.2 trillion. Better yet, the president projects that by 2014 the deficit will decrease by more than half to reach $706 billion.

How does Obama hope to get there? He pencils in an 18.5 percent increase in revenue between FY2010 and FY2011.

2010 – 2011 Changes

Where will all this new money come from? First, the president assumes revenue from letting the Bush tax cuts expire on income earners making more than $250,000 per household. Then he assumes revenue from closing “loopholes” on the corporate income tax sides. (What he calls loopholes are just exemptions that were built into the corporate income tax system to help U.S. companies competing on the international market.) If Obama succeeds in repealing these exemptions without reforming the corporate tax code, however, there is no doubt that American companies will have a harder time making a buck and that the revenue stream they bring in will shrink.

Finally, the president's revenue estimate relies on optimism. His projected GDP growth and unemployment numbers are very rosy. In FY2011, the president assumes that the economy will grow by 5.1 percent (see Table S-13 of the Summary Tables). He assumes that the economy will grow by 6 percent in 2012. And he expects the unemployment rate to decline. While his jobs programs have failed miserably so far, he anticipates that next year the unemployment rate will drop to 9.2 percent. Better yet, in 2012 it will drop to 8.2 percent and will reach 6.5 percent in FY2014.

Given how unrealistic these projections are, relying on an 18.5 percent increase in revenue this year is simply not credible. Which puts the other numbers in President Obama's budget—which is already nothing to write home about—in an even harsher light.

Veronique de Rugy is an economist at The Mercatus Center and a columnist for Reason magazine. Read her Reason archive here.

Big Government's Cronies

Many window-making companies struggle because of the recession's effect on home building. But one little window company, Serious Materials, is "booming," says Fortune. "On a roll," according to Inc. magazine, which put Serious' CEO on its cover, with a story titled: "How to Build a Great Company."

The Minnesota Freedom Foundation tells me that this same little window company also gets serious attention from the most visible people in America.

Vice President Joe Biden appeared at the opening of one of its plants. CEO Kevin Surace thanked him for his "unwavering support." "Without you and the recovery ("stimulus") act, this would not have been possible," Surace said.

Biden returned the compliment: "You are not just churning out windows; you are making some of the most energy-efficient windows in the world. I would argue the most energy-efficient windows in the world."

Gee, other window-makers say their windows are just as energy efficient, but the vice president didn't visit them.

Biden laid it on pretty thick for Serious Materials: "This is a story of how a new economy predicated on innovation and efficiency is not only helping us today but inspiring a better tomorrow."

Serious doesn't just have the vice president in his corner. It's got President Obama himself.

Company board member Paul Holland had the rare of honor of introducing Obama at a "green energy" event. Obama then said: "Serious Materials just reopened ... a manufacturing plant outside of Pittsburgh. These workers will now have a new mission: producing some of the most energy-efficient windows in the world."

How many companies get endorsed by the president of the United States?

When the CEO said that opening his factory wouldn't have been possible without the Obama administration, he may have known something we didn't. Last month, Obama announced a new set of tax credits for so-called green companies. One window company was on the list: Serious Materials. This must be one very special company.

But wait, it gets even more interesting.

On my Fox Business Network show on "crony capitalism," I displayed a picture of administration officials and so-called "energy leaders" taken at the U.S. Department of Energy. Standing front and center was Cathy Zoi, who oversees $16.8 billion in stimulus funds, much of it for weatherization programs that benefit Serious.

The interesting twist is that Zoi happens to be the wife of Robin Roy, who happens to be vice president of "policy" at Serious Windows.

Of all the window companies in America, maybe it's a coincidence that the one which gets presidential and vice presidential attention and a special tax credit is one whose company executives give thousands of dollars to the Obama campaign and where the policy officer spends nights at home with the Energy Department's weatherization boss.

Or maybe not.

There may be nothing illegal about this. Zoi did disclose her marriage and said she would recuse herself from any matter that had a predictable effect on her financial interests.

But it sure looks funny to me, and it's odd that the liberal media have so much interest in this one company. Rachel Maddow of MSNBC, usually not a big promoter of corporate growth, gushed about how Serious Materials is an example of how the "stimulus" is working.

When we asked the company about all this, a spokeswoman said, "We don't comment on the personal lives of our employees." Later she called to say that my story is "full of lies."

But she wouldn't say what those lies are.

On its website, Serious Materials says it did not get a taxpayer subsidy. But that's just playing with terms. What it got was a tax credit, an opportunity that its competitors did not get: to keep money it would have paid in taxes. Let's not be misled. Government is as manipulative with selective tax credits as it is with cash subsidies. It would be more efficient to cut taxes across the board. Why should there be favoritism?

Because politicians like it. Big, complicated government gives them opportunities to do favors for their friends.

John Stossel is host of Stossel on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of Give Me a Break and of Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity. To find out more about John Stossel, visit his site at johnstossel.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

Fiscal Stimulus is Buying Trouble

This week, President Obama had the dubious pleasure of offering a budget with a deficit of more than a trillion dollars. He could have done something more politically attractive: unveil a plan to curb the runaway spending of the Bush years.

But to do that, the president would have had to make a different choice a year ago, by rejecting the $787 billion fiscal stimulus package passed by Congress. Of all the mistakes Obama has made, that now looks like the worst.

It's a big reason he's widely regarded as an old-fashioned, big-government liberal. It's a big reason Republicans have been able to make the public forget their horrendous fiscal record. It's a big reason for the tea parties.

All these might be a tolerable price to pay if the stimulus had provided a crucial shot of adrenaline. But the evidence indicates otherwise.

Early in the administration, Obama's economic advisers issued a prediction: Without a big stimulus, the unemployment rate would rise from 7.2 percent to 9 percent. With it, the rate would peak at 8 percent. We could have the stimulus, or we could have high unemployment.

In reality, we've gotten the worst of both worlds. The stimulus went through, and unemployment went over 10 percent.

Maybe things would be even worse without all that new spending, which is what the administration claims. But if it can't come halfway close to predicting the effect of the stimulus, how can it be so sure it's doing any good?

Last week's official report that the effort created 600,000 jobs certainly didn't prove anything. All the government did was count how many jobs were paid for with stimulus funds.

That ignores the obvious problem. Money the government uses to create jobs is money that can't be used by the private sector to create jobs. But no one in the White House is trying to count jobs that didn't get created as a result of this mass diversion of funds.

You may not be reassured by the reasoning of Earl Devaney, who heads the federal panel that compiled the numbers. "The people who got the money feel this is working," he told The Washington Post. If Devaney wants to send me a check, I might come around too.

The whole idea of the stimulus is that when the government builds roads and bridges, it puts money into the economy, which generates growth. But Stanford economist John Taylor, speaking Monday at a Hoover Institution conference, pointed out something that stimulus supporters have overlooked: Over the past three years, there is no relationship between the amount of government purchases of non-military items and the rate of economic growth. Oops.

The other theory was that putting more money into the hands of consumers would cause them to go out and buy things. The administration pursued this objective with a tax credit that reduced withholding and thus fattened paychecks.

But the evidence for this approach was also badly lacking. In 2008, President Bush tried to strengthen the economy by sending out rebates of up to $600 per taxpayer. As Taylor documents, the amount of cash Americans had at their disposal jumped. But their spending didn't.

He is not the only leading macroeconomist who doubts the efficacy of such measures. But even if you accept the theory behind the Obama plan, you have to wonder about its usefulness in the real world. Timing is everything, and by the time Washington can pass and implement a stimulus, it's usually too late to help.

You want to stimulate the economy when it's in a recession. But only a quarter of the money in the package was spent in the first seven months. Most of it was scheduled for this year and next—which turns out to be long after the economy resumed growing last summer. In the fourth quarter, gross domestic product expanded at a sizzling 5.7 percent rate.

Applying fiscal stimulus at this point is like using a cattle prod on Usain Bolt. Even with the encouragement, he's not likely to go any faster.

The administration could claim that the recent boost proves that its effort worked to get the economy back on track. But in that case, why do we need to spend $135 billion in 2011?

All that funding probably won't make the economy stronger. But for those who want to portray Obama as leading the nation off a cliff, it should mean lasting prosperity.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM

Listening to Mises

Henry Hazlitt said that when he first picked up a phone in the 1940s and heard the voice of the already legendary Austrian economist and liberal political philosopher Ludwig Von Mises on the other end, it was the equivalent of picking up the phone and hearing "This is John Stuart Mill speaking!"

Now you can sort of emulate the fascinating experience of hearing Mises's voice, a rare treat as he died in 1973. The Mises Institute has just posted an mp3 of a broadcast from the "U.S. Steel Concert Hour" from 1962, with Mises answering the not very musical question, ""Are the interests of the American wage earners in conflict with those of their employers, or are the two in agreement?" (By the by, he doesn't rap once. That was more of a Hayek thing.)

For those who prefer reading to listening, a transcript here.

Federal Spending and GDP: Uh-oh, Here We Go

A useful new chart from Cato's Chris Edwards:

To the moon!

Obama's Budget Makes the "terrible mistake" of "borrow[ing] against our children's future to pay our way today"...According to Obama

Here are some words President Barack Obama spoke yesterday when unveiling his new $3.8 trillion budget proposal:

[W]e can't simply move beyond this crisis; we have to address the irresponsibility that led to it. And that includes the failure to rein in spending, as well a reliance on borrowing –- from Wall Street to Washington to Main Street –- to fuel our growth. That's what we have to change. We have to do what families across America are doing: Save where we can so that we can afford what we need. [...]

Trying to find a non-hyperbolic "Obama two-face" image on Google is not very easy[I]t would be a terrible mistake to borrow against our children's future to pay our way today [...]

That's also why we're restoring pay-as-you-go: a simple rule that says Congress can't spend a dime without cutting a dime elsewhere. This rule helped lead to the budget surpluses of the 1990s, and it's one of the most important steps we can take to restore fiscal discipline in Washington. [...]

[T]he bottom line is this: We simply cannot continue to spend as if deficits don't have consequences; as if waste doesn't matter; as if the hard-earned tax dollars of the American people can be treated like Monopoly money; as if we can ignore this challenge for another generation. We can't. [...]

What I will not welcome -– what I reject -– is the same old grandstanding when the cameras are on, and the same irresponsible budget policies when the cameras are off. It's time to hold Washington to the same standards families and businesses hold themselves. It's time to save what we can, spend what we must, and live within our means once again.

Here are some other words President Barack Obama spoke yesterday when unveiling his new $3.8 trillion budget proposal:

The budget includes...investments that will create jobs repairing roads and bridges, and tax breaks for retrofitting homes to save energy. [...]

[I]t would be equally wrong to neglect [our children's] future by failing to invest in areas that will determine our economic success in this new century.

That's why we build on the largest investment in clean energy in history, as well as increase investment in scientific research, so that we are fostering the industries and jobs of the future right here in America.

Like I said....That's why I've proposed a more than 6 percent increase in funding for the Education Department. [...]

And that's why we eliminate a wasteful subsidy to banks that lend to college students, and use that money to revitalize community colleges and make college more affordable.  This will help us reach the goal I've set for America:  By 2020 we will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.

These are the investments we must make to create jobs and opportunity now and in the future.

Given that President George W. Bush's first budget clocked in at $1.9 trillion, I estimate that at current rates we will achieve Real Existing Fiscal Responsibility by approximately 2022.

Reason.tv: Obama's Doublethink Doubletalk (State of the Union Remix)

George Orwell defined doublethink as "the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them."

When it comes to war, spending, and more, President Barack Obama's 2010 State of the Union address showed that doublethink is alive and well in Washington, D.C.

Approximately two minutes. Written and produced by Paul Feine.

For downloadable versions of all videos, go to Reason.tv.

Subscribe to Reason.tv's YouTube channel and receive automatic notifications when new videos go online.

From a Nudge to a Shove? Will Behavioral Economics Become a New Form of Coercion?

Over at Neuroworld, Reason contributor Ryan Sager looks at two examples of applying behavioral economics to public policy. Here, he quotes from a Guardian piece by George Osborne and Richard Thaler (the latter is the co-author with Obama regulation czar Cass Sunstein of Nudge):

In Sacramento, an energy company has harnessed the insights of behavioural science, and prints information on energy bills that allows households to compare their energy use with similar homes. This simple change led to a fall in overall energy consumption as homes using more energy than their neighbours quickly adjusted their behaviour to fit in with the norm.

OK, that doesn't seem too bad, right? So here's another suggestion from Osborne and Thaler:

We are working together to formulate a series of public policies on issues ranging from the environment to financial regulation. Because the academic literature shows the importance of a way a decision is framed, the Conservative party is working with councils to replace Labour’s bin taxes with schemes that pay the public to recycle. In Windsor and Maidenhead our pilot scheme has already increased recycling rates by 30%.

OK, that doesn't seem too coercive, does it? Though it may well be an incredible waste of money depending on how much it costs to pay people to increase recycling rates by 30 percent. The authors don't mention that tidbit in their col, alas, so any sort of cost-benefit analysis is impossible.

But then Sager notes what else our dynamic duo is up to:

The piece also recommends a seven-day cooling-off period for store credit cards, so that people don’t wrack up huge debts in the heat of the moment at the checkout counter. They call this less intrusive than banning the cards or instituting a new tax — though, it still sounds pretty intrusive to these American ears (errr… eyes).

Read Sager's post here.

Yes, I'd say that's intrusive. And might well have all sorts of effects on business, when you can officially bring back any credit card purchase after a week. It's worth noting that many cards and stores have return policies already. Why not allow the private sector to work it out? Because, I assume, that wouldn't be as much fun for paternalists.

Nonprofits Are People, Too

Buried in the middle of an interesting New York Times story on an editorial shakeup at Harper's magazine is a throwaway line that I think both reflects a certain ignorance about The Rich and provides a cautionary tale for those who see the nonprofit business model as the panacea for print journalism's continuing crisis:

The foundation model does not entirely protect a publication from a sputtering economy.

Not entirely! I won't repeat myself here, other than to point out that, yeah, even people who have enough money to give substantial amounts to nonprofits are affected by economic downturns. If you sell stuff for a living, and the economy tanks, you are now almost certainly making less of it. Ditto if you're a non-shortseller making your money on Wall Street during a bear market. And for those nonprofits big/smart enough to have substantial reserves, that money, too, is susceptible to rapid depletion via unsafe investing.

Best quote in the story:

"The business side is run like it's Esquire in 1968, and the edit side is run like it's Amnesty International in 1987," said one editorial staff member.

The site you are reading is published by a nonprofit; you can support it by subscribing to the print magazine, giving a donation to the Reason Foundation, or just continuing to read, watch, comment, complain, and forward. Thanks!

Economics
All Reason Magazine articles in the "Economics" topic.

 

 

Search Powered By Google

Google Search   

Job & Career Search

career & job search                    job title, keywords, company, location

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

Investing Jobs

Finance Jobs

Advertisement

MARKET INDICATORS

 

    Stock Markets Overview
    Volume Leaders
    Percent Advances
    Percent Declines
    Daily 52 Week Highs
    Daily 52 Week Lows
    Market Indices
    S&P 500
    NASDAQ 100
    Exchange Traded Funds - ETF Watch
    FOREX FX Exchange Rates
    Futures Prices by Exchange
    Futures Prices by Type
    US Morning Call Commentary


Stock Market News, Indicators, Market and Industry Articles Source. Find out what is happening in the Stock Markets. Visit iHaveNet.com for the latest Stock Market News by Sector and Industry. Your Single Source to Stock Market, Economic, Business and Industry News Articles.

ADVERTISEMENT

Job & Career Search

career & job search                    job title, keywords, company, location

Search Powered By Google

Google Search   

Advertisement

  • HOME
  • WORLD
  • USA
  • BUSINESS
  • WEALTH
  • STOCKS
  • TECH
  • HEALTH
  • LIFESTYLE
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • SPORTS

 

Stock Market News & Financial Markets Investing Current Events

  • Services:
  • RSS Feeds
  • Shopping
  • Email Alerts
  • Site Map
  • Privacy