(c) David Horsey

White House talking out both sides of its mouth in blind rush for healthcare reform

Vice President Joe Biden, speaking on ABC's This Week recently, said that the administration "misread the economy." Its projections for the federal deficit were too optimistic, and slower economic growth will spell even bigger deficits for the next generation.

The administration and Democrats in Congress may also be misreading the healthcare system they are trying to overhaul.

President Obama has argued that such a revamp is needed for the nearly 50 million Americans uninsured each year.

So who are these uninsured? They are not the poorest of the poor, who are eligible for Medicaid.

According to 2007 figures from the Census Bureau, 17.5 million uninsured Americans have household incomes of $50,000 or more; an additional 9.1 million have incomes of $75,000 or more; 21 million of them work full time. A stunning 11 million were offered coverage by their employers and declined it, according to a report released recently by the Employment Policies Institute.

Some are healthy people who would rather spend their money elsewhere; others decline it for religious reasons -- take, for example, a Christian Scientist who doesn't believe in going to the doctor. That same report adds that 43 percent of the uninsured make more than 2½ times the poverty level and that half are under age 35 and single. So a large percentage are relatively healthy, employed young people who have made a rational economic decision to avoid healthcare premiums.

Most people agree that we have a serious obligation to provide affordable healthcare to those who need it, but most would also agree that we do not need to remake our system for millions of Americans who just don't want it. Poll after poll shows that most Americans are happy with their current healthcare--of course, we'd all like someone else to pay the bill--but the vast majority of us want to be able to keep our doctors and hospitals.

Yet the Obama administration is going full steam ahead, with the president committed to signing legislation by the end of this year. So the rush is on: The Washington Post recently diagrammed the "record-breaking influence campaign by the healthcare industry"--a web of over 350 former government officials, including ex-congressional leaders, who have been hired by the various players on all sides, spending $1.4 million a day in lobbying fees. In the suburbs of Washington where I live, the television ads are nonstop, advocating different versions of reform, many from nebulous groups with names like Healthcare Now America, Americans United for Change, Change Congress, and Democracy for America. Whether they're representing doctors, hospitals, insurers, employers, unions, or the political parties is unclear. Who are these people, and what are they really supporting? Nobody I know can tell you.

Every time the White House makes a pitch for healthcare reform, it seems to try a different argument. Some days it argues we've all got to pay for universal care for the uninsured; on others, we're told we already indirectly pay for that care, and we've got to reduce the cost of it. To some audiences, it extols the virtues of a government-run public plan; to others, it promises we can keep the coverage and the doctors we already have. It's niche marketing to various segments of the electorate and, taken as a whole, is confusing and inconsistent, if not contradictory.

It also comes across as desperate. At a recent town hall meeting in Annandale, Va., President Obama took questions that the White House said were "directly from the public." The president called on a crying woman who couldn't afford healthcare for her cancer treatment but, according to the Huffington Post, she volunteers for Organizing for America, the Democratic National Committee's political operation. Other supposedly random questions came from members of the Service Employees International Union and Healthcare America Now, a coalition supporting the White House healthcare reform plan, funded by the AFL-CIO and MoveOn.org. When the White House says it's hearing from "the public" but then calls on people from organizations it's working with to push this through, it must realize it comes across as manipulative and cynical--something many on the left accused the Bush White House of being.

No wonder people want to keep what they have.

Most Americans remember the days of exploratory surgery, X-rays instead of PET scans, and long hospital stays. They realize that we now have the world's best healthcare, vastly improved treatments for chronic illnesses, and progress toward cures for many diseases. Sure, insurance companies and claim forms drive everyone crazy. But the devil we know may not be as bad as the one we don't know.

When I hear about the government taking over a huge share of our economy by taking over healthcare, I think of the government office most people deal with most often: the post office.

The U.S. Postal Service is a great example of a congressionally run "public plan" for delivery of services that people need. No thanks.

For many families, massively changing our healthcare system will affect their monthly budget and their children's healthcare choices for a long time.

For our economy, healthcare reform is big money and big consequences for future generations, especially now that the administration will be revising the deficit projections upward. It's all just too much, too fast, and the stakes are too high.

We can't afford another "misreading."

Hard Choices on Healthcare Reform
by Mortimer B. Zuckerman

In the 1980s, if you had a heart attack and got to the hospital, you had about a 60 percent chance of living a year. Today, it is over 90 percent. We have been able to transform the health of the American public because of the rapid development of new medicines and technology. These innovations have come at a cost: They are responsible for as much as two thirds of the annual spending increases in healthcare. We'd like to get back to the costs of 1980, but nobody is willing to go back to 1980 medicine

Healthcare Reform's Effect on You
by Bernadine Healy M.D.

Some elements might change before a final healthcare bill is in hand, but enough common threads have emerged for people to look beyond the headlines for an idea of how the new healthcare system will affect them personally. For starters, consider these seven ways in which your healthcare experience is apt to change ...

Lack of Competition in Healthcare Insurance Market
by Kent Garber

Should healthcare reform include an option for Americans to buy insurance from the government? President Obama has made it a priority, arguing that a government plan would make the insurance market more competitive and help lower costs. Republicans aggressively oppose this, asserting that a public plan would all but destroy the private market.

Healthcare Industry jobs

Find your next job in the Healthcare Industry. Search Healthcare jobs from thousands of job and career search sites.

Obama Rush to Overhaul Healthcare Shows a Dangerous Deficit of Understanding

(c) 2009 U.S. News & World Report