If there's one element that seems uncooked in the current rush to 3D television, it's the glasses that viewers are forced to wear. They're big, awkward, and, for the most part, rather homely to boot. Even worse, manufacturers are hitting the market with a variety of spectacles, all incompatible with each other. And all are costly.
It's becoming clear that 3D television is seeping into American living rooms in a prelude to an eventual flood. Samsung, Panasonic, and
[Three-dimensional television is among a number of new features that await HDTV shoppers.]
It may not be quite as revolutionary as digital and high-definition TV, but manufacturers are betting that 3D will help sell more sets. "It'll be like eating popcorn while watching TV," says
If we can afford them.
The problem is that the cheap, polarized spectacles handed out at movie theaters won't work at home. New 3D televisions require sophisticated "active-shutter" eyewear, and manufacturers in a rush to get sets to market haven't worked out some kinks.
At least the systems headed for living rooms seem reliable and offer a great 3D experience. "The active-shutter glasses have a powerful impact," says
[Could 3D join the worst tech flops of the past decade?]
In theaters, cinema companies have paid to put the 3D magic into the projector and screen instead of the glasses.
That makes for expensive screens but cheap goggles for the audience. A few TVs sold overseas take the same approach. But their special screens are costly: A 24-inch monitor sold here by Hyundai goes for more than
TV makers won't gamble on such expensive models for the U.S. market, where sales are particularly sensitive to price. "So the cost goes into the active-shutter glasses, which is less risky for the TV manufacturer," says
Putting the 3D magic into glasses means the specs have to electronically synchronize with the TV set. The 3D screens rapidly flash alternating images for the left and right eye. The glasses open and close shutters over each eye so that each sees only the image intended for it, which is from a slightly different perspective. That gives the illusion of stereoscopic or three-dimensional vision.
It isn't an entirely new technology, having been tested outside
Putting the secret sauce into the glasses makes the cost of adding 3D tech to the television itself relatively small, boosting prices by 20 percent or less. A 55-inch Samsung LCD that is selling for about
So, even if buyers don't want 3D, they may have little choice as the feature gets built into most high-end TVs (and moves down the spectrum in coming years). Insight Media predicts that 1 in 4 sets sold in 2015 will be 3D-capable, at least for sets wider than 30 inches. That may be a conservative outlook; some manufacturers hope that half of new sets will be 3D by then.
But whether we're actually using those sets for 3D will depend on the glasses, and whether we have the right ones. TV manufacturers are trying different approaches that aren't compatible with each other. A pair of glasses that works with Panasonic won't work with
There are multiple reasons the glasses are different, but there are two big issues for compatibility.
"It's how the signal is emitted from the set and what's carried in the signal," says Panasonic's Fannon, who has been involved in early industry discussions on establishing standards.
There are assorted ways that TV sets "talk" to 3D glasses. Projectors typically use a flash of white light that bounces off the screen into the glasses. A few manufacturers link their LCDs with the glasses via radio technology, such as Bluetooth. Most LCD and plasma makers are using infrared signals. But even they are incompatible, much as infrared remote controls won't work with different makes of TVs.
Manufacturers also use different protocols, or software, to ensure fidelity and timing. Each thinks it has the best approach, although early discussions to set standards have spawned a formal process. Just underway, the talks could take a year or two to produce a standard--if they succeed at all. But optimists hope that TVs sold in 2011 will meet an industry standard. "I think manufacturers will soon realize the incompatibility is inhibiting adoption," says
Or they need universal glasses that will work across manufacturer lines, much like universal remotes can work with different gear. That's the approach of XpanD, a European company that makes active-shutter glasses. It has dominated the overseas market for glasses used in theaters, says
But the glasses won't work with sets that use Bluetooth or projectors that use white light.
Truly universal glasses will come later, perhaps by Christmas. They'll also be much more expensive, probably more than
At least the glasses will get more stylish. As a start, the universal XpanD glasses coming in June will be available in 12 different colors. More styles will follow.
And Dror is among those who predict that a standard technology will soon emerge or that manufacturers will begin boxing universal eyewear with their sets. The problem is that the big makers entered a race to get their 3D sets to market first, he says. "They didn't really have time to figure out the glasses."
Available at Amazon.com:
- 'Dotcom' Turns 25: Predictions for What Comes Next
- Costly Incompatible Glasses Threaten 3D TV Sales
- 4G Networks Promise True Wireless Broadband
- GPS: Cool Devices That Know Where They Are
- Ultimate HDTV HD Television Buying Guide
- How to Save With Cutting-Edge Tech
- Suddenly Instant Photos Are Everywhere
- Technology Opens Doors for Investors
- Apple's iPad: 5 Reasons Why the Apple Tablet Will Flop
- Apple's iPad: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
- An Amazon Kindle for Every Student
- The War on the Book
- What's New in Consumer Technology and Electronics
- CES 2010: Peripheral Vision
- Mobile Tech That Stole the Decade
- The Biggest Technology Flops of the Decade
(c) 2010 U.S. News & World Report