American health-care reform
(c) Dick Locher
Healthcare is already rationed in the U.S. -- it's controlled either by one's finances or, more often, by one's insurer
Rationing via wealth will not change. Out-of-network providers aren't going away -- the wealthy will still be able to obtain
private healthcare. However, this administration does have an opportunity to provide access to folks who now have none, and
perhaps to return doctor-patient choice to the doctor and the patient. For most folks, the current reality is that
healthcare control rests with one's insurer. Compared to all other 'developed' nations,
Comment by Richard of MA
The public plan does not restrict doctor patient choice. This plan, like every other private or public
insurance plan, limits payment for medical services. Payment for unlimited medical care would make any plan unaffordable.
The government does not subsidize most of our fundamental rights. Should the government subsidize gun purchases because Americans have a right to own a gun? Supporters of abortion rights have the right to subsidize abortion provided by non-governmental organizations.
Comment by Michael of GA
What do you think is going to happen when the government is paying the bill? The government will decide for you what it will pay for. You can still get that mammogram before age 50, you will just have to pay for it. It the government decides a procedure is not "cost effective" too bad for you. And for those of you who already have health insurance, you can keep it; just expect to pay more for the same level of coverage. Wow what a deal.
If a government single payer plan restricts testing, it will therefore cost less in taxes and fees. An individual can then still choose to buy additional testing or buy insurance for such testing. (That is if you are not excluded from it by the private companies.) All studies show that the overall cost of single payer plus supplements will be far less than the current system. A single payer system alters how premiums are collected and how bills are paid out, yielding a reduction in costs. Doctor's actions are not controlled nor does it eliminate access to tests and procedures. You will still be able to buy them as you can now...just without paying for executive bonuses, shareholder profits, and the underwriting/denial bureaucracy on the bulk of your healthcare.
Comment by Fred of CO
The patient's loss of choice and rights begin whenever I go to see a doctor. The amount of forms I am forced to
sign (while sick and especially going into surgery) to protect the doctors are outrageous.
The entire non-competitive, special interest authored, for profit, health system needs to be discarded. The greed is so high that the majority of medical students want to become specialists to earn $500,000+ and not accept traditional insurance as full payment.
How sad it has become when the patient is primarily seen as just a source used to maximize profit.
- There's No Place Like Home: Elderly Qualify for Wide Range of Services
- The 'Reform' That Ate America
- Congress Needs to Improve Quality of Healthcare
- Your Future Health Plan: When health reform dust settles few Americans will be unaffected
- Medicare Advantage Trims Could Affect Millions of Seniors
- Congress Fights Obesity With Healthcare Bills
- Why Americans Should Not Fear Scientific Progress
- Is a 'Cash Only' or 'Direct Pay' Doctor Right for You
- Even if health care insurance worries end soon work as engaged informed patients just beginning
Healthcare Industry jobs
Find your next job in the Healthcare Industry. Search Healthcare jobs from thousands of job and career search sites.
Healthcare - Healthcare Reform and Patient Choice
(c) 2009 U.S. News & World Report