Full body scanners and intrusive pat downs are a necessary line of defense
Regardless of recent, widely publicized attacks and thwarted plots, some Americans continue to question TSA security initiatives. Our narcissistic obsession with someone viewing or getting too close to our "junk" and anecdotes of pat-downs gone bad have diverted our attention from the seriousness of this reality.
Of course, nothing inspires adolescent humor and 24/7 media coverage faster than talk of people's privates. Such immaturity is fitting for the sophomoric event that triggered the visceral outrage and the follow-on protests. While collectively exhausting the deep well of potty jokes, most people displayed a firm grasp of our reality on
The banter about the infringement of our rights comes mostly from a small group of citizens and a large gaggle of pundits. Nevertheless, they have been effective in scrambling the wording, meaning, and judicial interpretations of the Fourth Amendment (which guards against unreasonable search and seizure). The courts have consistently upheld these types of searches as reasonable and legal.
Considering that only a small percentage of all travelers may need a pat-down -- 3 percent, according to the TSA -- and independent studies prove these machines are not harmful to our health, most passengers understand the reasonableness of these new screening procedures.
Reasonable passengers don't put up much of a fuss about complying with safety and security requests when they place themselves in an airborne, pressurized aluminum tube and hurtle through space at close to the speed of sound. Wheels-up is not a good time to realize aviation security measures have fallen short.
Opponents of the screening procedures have argued for focusing resources on the highest risks or targeting the most likely threats. Most people agree with this concept. But implementing it is more difficult than it sounds. This is because the highest risks are "clean skins" (of no discoverable background) and lone wolves (who go awry alone, in secret, and often act without anyone knowing).
Because a person's past offers no indication of future behavior, these threats are almost impossible to detect. This not only diminishes the value of trusted or registered traveler programs; it makes it incredibly difficult to detect and stop threats. Period. Physical screening, in these cases, provides the most robust method of guarding against suicide bombers.
Let's be honest. Pat-downs are a blunt instrument. But they are the best instrument if a passenger opts out of screening by machine. Body scanning machines are the best technological advancement at the checkpoints in decades. And their effectiveness continues to improve.
Our country is open and fluid, and keeping it that way presents a vulnerability Americans seem willing to accept in the face of a persistent threat. Still, one of the few points in our society that mandates scrutiny is the airport. The TSA provides arguably one of our last, though not our best, lines of defense. A little extra scrutiny at the checkpoint is a small price to pay to keep our larger society uninhibited.
Read why the TSA has its security priorities in the wrong place by the
Jeff Sural is a former official with the Transportation Security Administration and the Department of Homeland Security
Recent Vacation Ideas & Travel Destinations
- Taking the Kids and Learning a Snow Sport
- Winter Thrills in the Alps
- The Social Network Hits the Ski Slopes
- Avoiding Nasty Winter Travel Surprises
- Taking the Kids and Remembering Stellar Trips to Get Up Close to Nature
- Cruising in 2011
- Finding a Toilet in Europe
- World's Top 10 Wild Rides
- Top 10 Artist Homes and Studios
- Air New Zealand's 777-300LR - A Look at the Future?
- Who Had the Worst Customer Service in 2010?
- Heightened TSA Security Is Necessary to Keep Us Safe
- TSA Has Its Security Priorities in the Wrong Place
- In 2010, the DOT Heard Our SOS
- AmEx Platinum: Expensive but Some Good New Extras
- Terranea Resort Brings Mediterranean Style and Elegance
- The World's Top 10 Greatest Ceilings
- The New Travelex Chip Card -- OK, But Not Great
- Passengers Say They Miss Luggage-Inclusive Airfares the Most
- Plunging Into North England's Lake District
- Milan: A Big Italian Surprise
- Taking the Kids and Visiting Museums
- Taking the Kids To Puerto Rico
- New Online Destination Planning Program Tops the List
- Top 10 Unusual Things to Do at the Airport
- World's Top 10 Eccentric Constructions
- Ten Great Animal Statues
- With a Little Help From the TSA, 2011 Could Be a Flat Year for Travel
- Are Customized Prices Next for the Travel Industry
- Can't Use Your Miles? Give Them Away!
- 10 Ways to Stay Healthy During Holiday Travel
- Taking the Kids to a Ranch in Winter
- Slovakia: Booming Bratislava
- How Safe is a Cruise?
- Disney Turns to Guests to Promote Theme Parks
- World's Top 10 Ugliest Buildings
- 10 Fascinating Place Symbols
- What's Behind All Those Airline Change Fees?
- Taking the Kids and De-Stressing the Holidays
- Taking the Kids and Grabbing a Pre-Holiday Break
- Verdun, France: A Lesson About War
- Airline 'Code-Shares' Not Really 'Seamless'
- Taking the Kids to the San Diego Zoo and Wild Animal Park
- Taking the Kids to Kauai Hawaii
- Taking the Kids to Steamboat Springs Colorado
- Welsh Magic
- Cultural Voyeurism in Tangier
- European Restaurant Rules
- The Biggest Travel Gouge
- Online Travel Planning: For Real?
- Onboard Internet: Lots More Coming
- A La Carte Pricing: Coming to Cruises?
- Do They Hate Us?
- Are Travelers Overloaded By Social Media?
- Paying Up Front for Rental Car Nicks and Scratches
(c) 2010 U.S. News & World Report
World-renowned chefs with an extraordinary passion for food, share that passion. They make great cooking easier than you ever imagined. Each feature includes both an expert tip and an easy recipe - exactly what you need to transform your home cooking from acceptable to delectable.
Recipes Click Here
Movie Reviews, commentary and more. Plus Trailers from movies currently in theaters and available on DVD.
Movie Reviews Click Here