- LATIN AMERICA
- MIDDLE EAST
- United Kingdom
- United States
- New Zealand
- South Africa
- iHaveNet.com: Politics
by Robert B. Reich
Of all the nonsense Texas Gov. Rick Perry spews about states' rights and the 10th amendment, his dumbest is the notion that states should go it alone. "We've got a great Union," he said at a
The core of his message isn't outright secession, though. It's that the locus of governmental action ought to be at the state rather than the federal level. "It is essential to our liberty," he writes in his book, "Fed Up! Our Fight to Save America from Washington," "that we be allowed to live as we see fit through the democratic process at the local and state level."
Perry doesn't like the Federal Reserve Board. He hates the
This might be a good deal for Texas. According to the most recent data from the
But it would be a bad deal for most other so-called red states. On average, citizens of states with strong Republican majorities get back more from the federal government than they pay in.
On the other hand, fiscal secession would be a boon to most blue states, those with strong Democratic majorities. The citizens of California -- harder hit by the recession than most -- receive from Washington only
In other words, blue states are subsidizing red states. The federal government is like a giant sump pump -- pulling dollars out of liberal enclaves like California, New York, Massachusetts and Oregon, and sending them to conservative places like Montana, Idaho, Oklahoma, Arizona, Wyoming, Kansas, Nebraska and the Old South.
As a practical matter, then, Rick Perry's fight to save America from Washington would actually save blue states from red states. So is Perry a closet liberal?
Hardly. Perry's approach would also pit each state against another. That's already happening when it comes to competition for jobs. As a result, state money that might otherwise be spent on schools or infrastructure has been funneled to corporations.
As governor, Perry has so far doled out
This may be good for Texas but not for the states that lose the jobs lured there. Such handouts just rob Peter to pay Paul. Corporations are enriched by the state tax dollars that bribe them to relocate, but America as a whole doesn't gain new jobs. It's just a giant zero-sum game.
Worse yet, the tax dollars used in these kinds of bidding wars can turn into political slush funds for governors. Perhaps not coincidentally, the
How responsibilities should be divided up between different levels of government is an important question. America has been struggling with it since our founding.
But one of the main reasons we relay on the federal government -- and don't pay attention to how much the citizens of our own state get back for every tax dollar we send to Washington -- is the idea that we're all in this together. E Pluribus Unum.
Making states rather than the federal government the locus of public action would pull us apart. The only beneficiaries of such zero-sum games would be the biggest companies that can play one state off against the other.
WORLD | AFRICA | ASIA | EUROPE | LATIN AMERICA | MIDDLE EAST | UNITED STATES | ECONOMICS | EDUCATION | ENVIRONMENT | FOREIGN POLICY | POLITICS
Rick Perry's Plan to Help Blue States and Big Corporations | Politics
© Tribune Media Services, Inc.