- LATIN AMERICA
- MIDDLE EAST
- United Kingdom
- United States
- New Zealand
- South Africa
- iHaveNet.com: Politics
by Kenneth T. Walsh
November 9th marks the anniversary of one of the most important moments of the 20th century albeit an event that most Americans seem to barelyremember. It was the day the Berlin Wall came crashing down in 1989. It was dramatic evidence that the SovietUnion was unraveling and that international communism was on its last legs. Perhaps most important, the fall of the wall was aconclusive sign that, after a titanic struggle spanning two generations after World War II, the United States and theother Western democracies had finally won the Cold War.
"The significance of the actual wall coming down was immense," says Roman Popadiuk, a former
In the end, two presidents deserve much of the credit: Bush, who handled the final throes of the Soviet demise with prudenceand restraint, and Ronald Reagan, who preceded Bush in the
President Reagan entered into a strategicpartnership with then Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to halt the Cold War and encourage reform of the corrupt and dangerous Soviet system.Reagan's role was all the more amazing because he had taken office in 1981 as an aggressive cold warrior who condemned the SovietUnion as an "evil empire."
At first, Reagan placed relentless military, diplomatic, moral, and financial pressure on the Kremlin.But he eventually recognized that a more cooperative approach was needed after the innovative Gorbachev came on the scene during Reagan'ssecond term. Reagan's remarkable speech at the Brandenburg Gate in Berlin on June 12, 1987, when hedemanded, "Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" presaged the end of an era of confrontation between the superpowers.
Bush continued Reagan's approach and, beyond that, demonstrated sensitivity and good sense by not gloating or pushing too hardfor more changes when the U.S.S.R. started to disintegrate. Bush told aides he didn't want to "poke a finger in Gorbachev's eye," whichmight have undermined his Russian counterpart with hard-liners in Moscow and jeopardized the gains that were beingmade. Bush's restraint facilitated an orderly transition from the repressive communist system that was a menace to the world.
And there are plenty of lessons for today.
"Our policymakers have to learn patience," says Popadiuk, author of the newly published The Leadership of George Bush.
Adds Frank Donatelli, who was Reagan's
President Obama and his advisers have drawn their own conclusions about the need for vigorous presidential leadership. "It'sonly through engagement that you can bring about progress," says senior
Axelrod also says, "I think temperamentally there's something about Obama and Reagan. First of all, they both had a realappreciation and respect for the presidency. I think the fact is that people want their president to be connected, and they also want thepresidency to be an elevated platform. And I think both Reagan and Obama had the ability to contest vigorously around ideas withoutvilifying their opponents. I know Reagan had a stiletto wit at times, but the truth is that he forged good relationships that transcendedpolitics but also made progress."
There are events marking the destruction of the wall today at the
© Tribune Media Services, Inc