by Jules Witcover

After three months of licking the wounds of his defeat, Mitt Romney surfaced Sunday on Fox News with a somewhat unexpected rationale for his disappointing election outcome. What cost him the White House, he seemed to say, was what he loved to call and still calls "Obamacare."

Throughout the campaign, Romney hammered away at President Obama's Affordable Care Act. He depicted it as a hugely unpopular power grab that he would "repeal and replace" when he got to the Oval Office, with the grateful relief and support of the American public.

But when asked Sunday why he had lost, here's what Romney said: "It's a proven political strategy, which is you have a bunch of money from the government to a group and, guess what, they'll vote for you. ... The president had the power of incumbency. Obamacare was very attractive, particularly to those without health insurance. And they came out in large numbers to vote" for his opponent.

It sounded as if Romney, his chief political advisers, and the bulk of the Republican Party had based much of their campaign on opposition to a program they believed would be their ticket to the presidency. And that they had sorely misread the sentiment in the country at large about it.

Romney suggested that the health care law was the decisive political issue for minority voters who in the end brought him down. "The weakness that our campaign had and I had," he said, "is we weren't effective in taking our message primarily to minority voters, to Hispanic Americans, African Americans, other minorities. We did very well with the majority population but not with minority populations," which voted overwhelmingly for Obama.

These observations inevitably recycled Romney's campaign comment to a closed meeting of donors that the "47 percent" of Americans "are dependent upon government, ... believe they are victims, ... believe that government has a responsibility to care for them," and thus would never vote for the GOP nominee.

Romney candidly acknowledged now that "it was a very unfortunate remark that I made. It's not what I meant. I didn't express myself as I wished I would have. You know, when you speak in private, you don't spend as much time thinking about how something could be twisted, distorted and it could come out wrong and be used. But I did (say it), and it was very harmful. What I said is not what I believe. ... My whole life has been devoted to helping people, all of the people."

Romney's implication that the 47 percent comment had been "twisted and distorted" belied the fact that the remark was recorded and videotaped for all the country to see and hear.

Earlier in the same interview, Romney's wife, Ann, acknowledged that she and one of her sons were frustrated that their own campaign resisted family urgings that more of the nominee's personal life be made public. But she argued that the election loss "was not just the campaign's fault."

She went on: "I believe it was the media's fault as well, that he was not being given a fair shake, that people weren't really allowed to see him for who he was." She said she was "happy to blame the media," that "our side believe that there is more bias in favor of the other side," and that "I think that is a universal, pretty universally felt opinion."

At the same time, Ann Romney confessed that while "we certainly had the passion coming from our side ... I don't think we were as aware of the passion that was coming from the other side," and that "we were a little blindsided by that."

And when asked by Fox anchor Chris Wallace about the image that "you were so wealthy that you were somehow out of touch with the concerns of the average American," she inartfully replied: "That's a reality, you know, you can't change. I mean, we are who we are."

Yes, but it might have helped had her husband been a bit more attuned to, and articulate about, how the other half lives.

 

Receive our political analysis by email by subscribing here



Mitt Romney's Surprising Post-Mortem | Politics

© iHaveNet