iHaveNet.com
World - United States - Pakistan Partnership in Peril | Middle East
  • HOME
  • WORLD
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Balkans
    • Caucasas
    • Central Asia
    • Eastern Europe
    • Europe
    • Indian Subcontinent
    • Latin America
    • Middle East
    • North Africa
    • Scandinavia
    • Southeast Asia
    • United Kingdom
    • United States
    • Argentina
    • Australia
    • Austria
    • Benelux
    • Brazil
    • Canada
    • China
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Ireland
    • Israel
    • Italy
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Mexico
    • New Zealand
    • Pakistan
    • Philippines
    • Poland
    • Russia
    • South Africa
    • Spain
    • Taiwan
    • Turkey
    • United States
  • USA
    • ECONOMICS
    • EDUCATION
    • ENVIRONMENT
    • FOREIGN POLICY
    • POLITICS
    • OPINION
    • TRADE
    • Atlanta
    • Baltimore
    • Bay Area
    • Boston
    • Chicago
    • Cleveland
    • DC Area
    • Dallas
    • Denver
    • Detroit
    • Houston
    • Los Angeles
    • Miami
    • New York
    • Philadelphia
    • Phoenix
    • Pittsburgh
    • Portland
    • San Diego
    • Seattle
    • Silicon Valley
    • Saint Louis
    • Tampa
    • Twin Cities
  • BUSINESS
    • FEATURES
    • eBUSINESS
    • HUMAN RESOURCES
    • MANAGEMENT
    • MARKETING
    • ENTREPRENEUR
    • SMALL BUSINESS
    • STOCK MARKETS
    • Agriculture
    • Airline
    • Auto
    • Beverage
    • Biotech
    • Book
    • Broadcast
    • Cable
    • Chemical
    • Clothing
    • Construction
    • Defense
    • Durable
    • Engineering
    • Electronics
    • Firearms
    • Food
    • Gaming
    • Healthcare
    • Hospitality
    • Leisure
    • Logistics
    • Metals
    • Mining
    • Movie
    • Music
    • Newspaper
    • Nondurable
    • Oil & Gas
    • Packaging
    • Pharmaceutic
    • Plastics
    • Real Estate
    • Retail
    • Shipping
    • Sports
    • Steelmaking
    • Textiles
    • Tobacco
    • Transportation
    • Travel
    • Utilities
  • WEALTH
    • CAREERS
    • INVESTING
    • PERSONAL FINANCE
    • REAL ESTATE
    • MARKETS
    • BUSINESS
  • STOCKS
    • ECONOMY
    • EMERGING MARKETS
    • STOCKS
    • FED WATCH
    • TECH STOCKS
    • BIOTECHS
    • COMMODITIES
    • MUTUAL FUNDS / ETFs
    • MERGERS / ACQUISITIONS
    • IPOs
    • 3M (MMM)
    • AT&T (T)
    • AIG (AIG)
    • Alcoa (AA)
    • Altria (MO)
    • American Express (AXP)
    • Apple (AAPL)
    • Bank of America (BAC)
    • Boeing (BA)
    • Caterpillar (CAT)
    • Chevron (CVX)
    • Cisco (CSCO)
    • Citigroup (C)
    • Coca Cola (KO)
    • Dell (DELL)
    • DuPont (DD)
    • Eastman Kodak (EK)
    • ExxonMobil (XOM)
    • FedEx (FDX)
    • General Electric (GE)
    • General Motors (GM)
    • Google (GOOG)
    • Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)
    • Home Depot (HD)
    • Honeywell (HON)
    • IBM (IBM)
    • Intel (INTC)
    • Int'l Paper (IP)
    • JP Morgan Chase (JPM)
    • J & J (JNJ)
    • McDonalds (MCD)
    • Merck (MRK)
    • Microsoft (MSFT)
    • P & G (PG)
    • United Tech (UTX)
    • Wal-Mart (WMT)
    • Walt Disney (DIS)
  • TECH
    • ADVANCED
    • FEATURES
    • INTERNET
    • INTERNET FEATURES
    • CYBERCULTURE
    • eCOMMERCE
    • mp3
    • SECURITY
    • GAMES
    • HANDHELD
    • SOFTWARE
    • PERSONAL
    • WIRELESS
  • HEALTH
    • AGING
    • ALTERNATIVE
    • AILMENTS
    • DRUGS
    • FITNESS
    • GENETICS
    • CHILDREN'S
    • MEN'S
    • WOMEN'S
  • LIFESTYLE
    • AUTOS
    • HOBBIES
    • EDUCATION
    • FAMILY
    • FASHION
    • FOOD
    • HOME DECOR
    • RELATIONSHIPS
    • PARENTING
    • PETS
    • TRAVEL
    • WOMEN
  • ENTERTAINMENT
    • BOOKS
    • TELEVISION
    • MUSIC
    • THE ARTS
    • MOVIES
    • CULTURE
  • SPORTS
    • BASEBALL
    • BASKETBALL
    • COLLEGES
    • FOOTBALL
    • GOLF
    • HOCKEY
    • OLYMPICS
    • SOCCER
    • TENNIS
  • Subscribe to RSS Feeds EMAIL ALERT Subscriptions from iHaveNet.com RSS
    • RSS | Politics
    • RSS | Recipes
    • RSS | NFL Football
    • RSS | Movie Reviews
United States - Pakistan Partnership in Peril
Daniel Markey

HOME > WORLD

 

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Pakistan's top spy, Lieutenant-General Ahmad Shuja Pasha, arrived in Washington for a series of intensive consultations. The visit followed a disastrous few months during which U.S. - Pakistan relations hit a new low. The Raymond Davis affair was the catalyst for a downward spiral that is no longer a mere diplomatic dispute or game of spy versus spy. If not for the revolutionary events in the Arab Middle East, the Japanese tsunami, and the budget debate, Americans would be more aware that the central pillars of U.S. strategy in Pakistan are in peril.

The Obama administration has routinely declared the vital strategic importance of Pakistan, and yet for all the rhetoric, its "AfPak" reviews have placed far greater emphasis on al-Qaeda and the Afghan war than on getting Pakistan right. The present crisis offers an important opportunity for change.

Any U.S. strategy for Pakistan must advance three primary goals.

First, it must work to eliminate international terrorist networks, degrade regional militant groups, and reduce the role of violent, extreme ideologies in Pakistani society.

Second, it should force and support an end to Pakistan's longstanding policy of actively or passively supporting militancy as a means to promote its interests in Afghanistan and India.

Third, it must help Pakistan achieve long-term stability through economic growth and reform.

A clear-headed understanding of what the latest crisis is about will help to guide future efforts. There are at least four overlapping reasons for the crisis.

Understanding Pakistan's Interests

The first cause is the most obvious. From the most senior generals to the average man on the street, Pakistanis are angry about U.S. violations of their territorial sovereignty. While U.S. officials believe such anger is overstated and misplaced -- after all, they are targeting terrorists who threaten to destabilize Pakistan -- the level of anti-American vitriol that runs through Pakistani society cannot be denied. Such anger makes it extremely difficult for Pakistan's leaders to justify cooperation with the United States, even if they appreciate the material benefits we offer. Any U.S. strategy must be crafted to operate under these constraints, as frustrating as they might be.

Beyond the level of raw emotion, Pakistan's leaders may also be trying to renegotiate the terms of their partnership with Washington at what they perceive to be a critical moment of American vulnerability. This is not a new phenomenon; Pakistan used its strategic geography during the Cold War to extract assistance from the United States in exchange for cooperation against the Soviet Union. With the Obama administration accelerating its military campaign in Afghanistan and along Pakistan's tribal belt, savvy Pakistani leaders may simply be attempting to raise the rent. Within limits, Washington should probably be willing to pay.

Third, the present crisis has roots in Islamabad's frustration that the United States is using tactics that weaken terrorist organizations that have historically been on the Pakistani intelligence service's payroll and are not perceived as threats to the Pakistani state. Pakistanis see unannounced U.S. drone strikes on North Waziristan-based fighters in the Haqqani network and the Hafiz Gul Bahadur group as killing militants with whom Islamabad enjoys influence and -- by many accounts -- nonaggression pacts. Worse, the Raymond Davis case exposed U.S. efforts to spy on Lashkar-e-Taiba, a group with even closer ties to the Pakistani state.

Pakistan's generals want the United States to narrow its target list to foreign fighters like al-Qaeda and the Pakistani Taliban groups who threaten Islamabad. Their motives are impossible to know for certain. At best, Pakistan's leaders believe they lack the capacity to attack all of these militants at the same time. They fear unifying opposition to the state and prefer a "divide and conquer" approach. At worst, they hope to maintain their militant proxy forces for future use against India and Afghanistan.

The United States cannot afford to back down on this issue. In fact, degrading LeT, Haqqani, and other militants must be part of Washington's effort to change Pakistan's regional strategy. The weaker the groups, the less utility they will hold for Pakistan, and the more likely Islamabad will choose to find alternative means -- preferably political and economic -- to expand its influence in the region.

Fourth, and most worrisome, the crisis reflects Pakistan's fundamental uncertainty about U.S. intentions and strategy in the region. In particular, Pakistanis fear that the war in Afghanistan will not end well for them. From Pakistan's perspective, Washington's military and diplomatic "surges" in Afghanistan have introduced new tensions without advancing any clear strategic purpose.

On the one hand, Pakistan sees U.S. General David Petraeus's expanded war of attrition as depleting Taliban forces, some of which are Islamabad's old allies. On the other hand, Pakistan sees Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's efforts to "reconcile" with the Taliban as a desperate effort to find a face-saving way to bring U.S. forces home quickly. In neither case does Islamabad feel that its interests are being looked after, reinforcing its deeper fear that Washington will abandon Afghanistan to chaos, or worse, to an Afghan regime whose sympathies lie with India. If only to reduce the unhealthy consequences of Pakistan's uncertainty, Washington needs to offer greater clarity about its strategy for Afghanistan.

Recasting the Relationship

With all these doubts, some Pakistanis believe that the costs of cooperating with Washington now outweigh the benefits. Those benefits -- in the form of billions of dollars in military and civilian assistance -- have so far provided the greatest ballast against a complete bilateral meltdown. Still, for a wide range of reasons, U.S. aid is not yet generating sufficient leverage or trust to enable effective cooperation.

The quantity of assistance may not be the problem. Greater sums of assistance could generate more dependency, not necessarily good will. With these points in mind, a revised assistance strategy is now required. In particular, Washington should focus on how U.S. dollars can be used to encourage private investment from American and other international sources into Pakistan. Greater trade and investment, not direct assistance, will be the only way to transform Pakistan's macroeconomic prospects over the long run.

All told, the present crisis has undermined critical pillars of the Obama administration's approach to Pakistan. By forcing Washington to pull covert operatives out of the country, Islamabad has hurt the U.S. ability to target terrorists by drone or human surveillance. By shutting down training programs for Pakistan's Frontier Scouts, steady improvements in Pakistani counterinsurgency capability have been jeopardized. Finally, given the bitter, critical tone taken by both Pakistani and U.S. officials in their recent public exchanges, it is clear that Washington's assiduous effort to cultivate closer personal and professional relationships with top Pakistani military leaders has taken a beating. The United States will need to find new, more sustainable ways to achieve each of these important ends.

All of Washington's goals would be best achieved by working in partnership with the people and government of Pakistan. But that does not mean U.S. policymakers should measure success by whether Pakistanis are pleased with their efforts. Some U.S. policies will be unpopular because they require significant and painful revisions to the status quo. Thus, even in this moment of crisis, Washington should resist the temptation to patch things up and get back to some lesser version of "business as usual."

At the same time, the opposite temptation -- to throw up our hands in frustration with Pakistan and seek alternate regional partners (as some in the U.S. Congress have suggested) -- would be even more dangerous. At best, the road to more successful partnership with Pakistan will be long, frustrating, and costly. But cultivating this partnership is probably still the best way to avoid facing a future in which a nuclear-armed Pakistan of nearly two hundred million people remains wracked by instability, riddled with extremists, and convinced that the use of militant proxy forces best serves its interests in the region.

(Daniel Markey is the Council on Foreign Relations' Senior Fellow for India, Pakistan and South Asia.)

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

 

  • China and the End of the Deng Dynasty
  • United States - Pakistan Partnership in Peril
  • Islamist Militancy in a Pre- and Post-Saleh Yemen
  • Iraq, Iran and the Next Move
  • World's Most Dangerous Man? Syrian Leader Makes Strong Case
  • A View from Syria
  • Libya and Beyond: Why not Every Nation for Itself?
  • Confidence Remains Strong in Global Markets Despite Crises
  • Latin America Provides Cautionary Tale for Middle East
  • The Arab Risings, Israel and Hamas
  • America Should Exercise Pragmatic Idealism in the Arab World
  • Richard Goldstone Recants His Report Attacking Israel
  • Middle East: Autocratic Deafness
  • A Brave Libyan Stands Up Against Rape
  • Is Pacific Fish Safe to Eat After the Disaster in Japan?
  • Demand and Disasters Complicate Global Energy Picture
  • Global Arms Trade: A Vortex of Death and Wealth
  • Arms Trade: a Filter, Not a Dam
  • Organised Crime: Joint Responsibility
  • It's Time, Mr. President: A Time for Clarity
  • Chances for a New US Foreign Policy Not Taken
  • Did the United States Give Up on Libya?
  • The Gulf Region: Anger Management
  • Saudi Arabia: Guarding The Fortress
  • Israel's Recent Political Actions Aren't Going Over Well
  • Israel: If Not Now, When?
  • A 'Reverse Beauty Pageant' for Tyrants
  • African Hydropower: Damming at What Cost?
  • United States - Pacific Relations: Pacific-Minded
  • 7 Problems That Could Derail the Global Economic Recovery
  • Technology Powers Revolutions and Saves Lives
  • Russia Stocks Soar on Rising Oil Prices
  • Japan: Heavy History
  • China: Weak Impetus for Change
  • China Sees the Evil of Plastic Bags
  • Pakistan: Educating For Tolerance
  • Immaculate Intervention: The Wars of Humanitarianism
  • AQAP and the Vacuum of Authority in Yemen
  • Japan Quake and Tsunami Among Most Costly of All Time
  • China's Economy the Key to Quelling Social Unrest
  • Syria's Stalled Revolution
  • Prudent Multilateralism in Libya
  • The Thinly Veiled Campaign for Regime Change
  • Unexpected Revelations in Libyan Intervention
  • President Obama's Most Amazing Libyan Achievements
  • Libya: Insanity Dawn
  • Obama's Half-a-Loaf War
  • Obama Said He Doesn't Mind Criticism on Libya Mission in Latin America
  • What Happened to the American Declaration of War?
  • The Power of Giving Back
  • Safety on the Cheap
  • Egyptian Elections: the Sooner, the Better
  • The Libyan Question: What Now?
  • Obama's 'Goldilocks' Doctrine
  • War Number Three
  • Un-Unified Oppositions in Bahrain and Yemen
  • Japanese Earthquake Brings Back Sad Memories
  • 5 Reasons Investors Should Not Bail on Japan
  • Japan's Nuclear Crisis Reignites Safety Debate
  • Military Involvement in Libya Costs Taxpayers Millions
  • United Nations Relevance
  • A Mother's Confession on Mothers' Day
  • Middle East Crisis: Today's Events in the Middle East
  • World's Costliest Disaster
  • Japan Crisis: Video Reports 3/23/2011
  • Israeli-Palestinian Tensions Escalating
  • Israel Faces a Culture of Hatred and Violence
  • Yemen in Crisis: A Special Report
  • Libya, the West and the Narrative of Democracy
  • Libya Crisis: Video Reports 3/22/2011
  • Japan Crisis: Video Reports 3/22/2011
  • Pakistan: Bad Investment for the United States
  • Libya Crisis: Video Reports 3/20/2011
  • The Libyan War of 2011
  • Libyan Forces Approach Benghazi
  • Libya Crisis: Implications of the Cease-Fire
  • Taming Chaos with a Personal Plan
  • The Threat to Israel From the 'New' Middle East
  • The United States Finds Itself on the Outside Looking In
  • Egypt and Tunisia Could Learn From Chile's Transition
  • Japan's Crisis for Nuclear Power
  • Chernobyl's Lessons for Japan
  • Pakistan: Bad Investment for the United States
  • Iran and the Saudis' Countermove on Bahrain
  • Japan, the Persian Gulf and Energy
  • Radiation Rising and Heading South in Japan
  • Japanese Government Confirms Meltdown
  • Officials Claim Positive Signs on Japanese Reactor
  • Nuclear Meltdown at Quake-Damaged Japanese Plant
  • U.S. Geologists Explain Science Behind Japanese Earthquake
  • The Slow Decline of North America
  • Will Libya Again Become the Arsenal of Terrorism?
  • How a Libyan No-fly Zone Could Backfire
  • Superpower Obligations
  • Caught in the Middle East Minefield
  • You Cannot Kill an Idea
  • Democracy Must Be the Future of the Middle East
  • Arab Revolutions Need Not Be Americanized
  • Bahrain and the Battle Between Iran and Saudi Arabia
  • 'New Chapter' in the Middle East
  • Embarrassing Times for Al Qaeda
  • Western Intervention in Libya Should Not Fly
  • Yemen: Divided Dissent
  • Egypt: The Road Ahead
  • Egypt: First Steps
  • That Other Middle East Protest
  • Arab World's Obsession With Israel Is Fading
  • Time to Rethink Arab Arms Sales
  • Cote d'Ivoire: Power Gridlock
  • UK - Latin American Relations: Rearranging The Deckchairs
  • Mexico: Cracking Down
  • Ireland: A Work In Progress

 

Available at Amazon.com:

Aftermath: Following the Bloodshed of America's Wars in the Muslim World

Displacement and Dispossession in the Modern Middle East (The Contemporary Middle East)

Enemies of Intelligence

The End of History and the Last Man

The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order

The Tragedy of Great Power Politics

The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations?

Running Out of Water: The Looming Crisis and Solutions to Conserve Our Most Precious Resource

Bottled and Sold: The Story Behind Our Obsession with Bottled Water

Water: The Epic Struggle for Wealth, Power, and Civilization

The Great Gamble

At War with the Weather: Managing Large-Scale Risks in a New Era of Catastrophes

Friendly Fire: Losing Friends and Making Enemies in the Anti-American Century

Dining With al-Qaeda: Three Decades Exploring the Many Worlds of the Middle East

Uprising: Will Emerging Markets Shape or Shake the World Economy

 

Copyright 2011, Foreign Affairs. Distributed by Tribune Media Services, Inc.

 

Recommend

Search Powered By Google

Google Search   

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Job & Career Search

career & job search                    job title, keywords, company, location
  • HOME
  • WORLD
  • USA
  • BUSINESS
  • WEALTH
  • STOCKS
  • TECH
  • HEALTH
  • LIFESTYLE
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • SPORTS

World - United States - Pakistan Partnership in Peril | Global Viewpoint

  • Services:
  • RSS Feeds
  • Shopping
  • Email Alerts
  • Site Map
  • Privacy