iHaveNet.com
World - NATO Summit Unlikely to Answer the Most Important Questions | NATO
  • HOME
  • WORLD
    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Balkans
    • Caucasas
    • Central Asia
    • Eastern Europe
    • Europe
    • Indian Subcontinent
    • Latin America
    • Middle East
    • North Africa
    • Scandinavia
    • Southeast Asia
    • United Kingdom
    • United States
    • Argentina
    • Australia
    • Austria
    • Benelux
    • Brazil
    • Canada
    • China
    • France
    • Germany
    • Greece
    • Hungary
    • India
    • Indonesia
    • Ireland
    • Israel
    • Italy
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Mexico
    • New Zealand
    • Pakistan
    • Philippines
    • Poland
    • Russia
    • South Africa
    • Spain
    • Taiwan
    • Turkey
    • United States
  • USA
    • ECONOMICS
    • EDUCATION
    • ENVIRONMENT
    • FOREIGN POLICY
    • POLITICS
    • OPINION
    • TRADE
    • Atlanta
    • Baltimore
    • Bay Area
    • Boston
    • Chicago
    • Cleveland
    • DC Area
    • Dallas
    • Denver
    • Detroit
    • Houston
    • Los Angeles
    • Miami
    • New York
    • Philadelphia
    • Phoenix
    • Pittsburgh
    • Portland
    • San Diego
    • Seattle
    • Silicon Valley
    • Saint Louis
    • Tampa
    • Twin Cities
  • BUSINESS
    • FEATURES
    • eBUSINESS
    • HUMAN RESOURCES
    • MANAGEMENT
    • MARKETING
    • ENTREPRENEUR
    • SMALL BUSINESS
    • STOCK MARKETS
    • Agriculture
    • Airline
    • Auto
    • Beverage
    • Biotech
    • Book
    • Broadcast
    • Cable
    • Chemical
    • Clothing
    • Construction
    • Defense
    • Durable
    • Engineering
    • Electronics
    • Firearms
    • Food
    • Gaming
    • Healthcare
    • Hospitality
    • Leisure
    • Logistics
    • Metals
    • Mining
    • Movie
    • Music
    • Newspaper
    • Nondurable
    • Oil & Gas
    • Packaging
    • Pharmaceutic
    • Plastics
    • Real Estate
    • Retail
    • Shipping
    • Sports
    • Steelmaking
    • Textiles
    • Tobacco
    • Transportation
    • Travel
    • Utilities
  • WEALTH
    • CAREERS
    • INVESTING
    • PERSONAL FINANCE
    • REAL ESTATE
    • MARKETS
    • BUSINESS
  • STOCKS
    • ECONOMY
    • EMERGING MARKETS
    • STOCKS
    • FED WATCH
    • TECH STOCKS
    • BIOTECHS
    • COMMODITIES
    • MUTUAL FUNDS / ETFs
    • MERGERS / ACQUISITIONS
    • IPOs
    • 3M (MMM)
    • AT&T (T)
    • AIG (AIG)
    • Alcoa (AA)
    • Altria (MO)
    • American Express (AXP)
    • Apple (AAPL)
    • Bank of America (BAC)
    • Boeing (BA)
    • Caterpillar (CAT)
    • Chevron (CVX)
    • Cisco (CSCO)
    • Citigroup (C)
    • Coca Cola (KO)
    • Dell (DELL)
    • DuPont (DD)
    • Eastman Kodak (EK)
    • ExxonMobil (XOM)
    • FedEx (FDX)
    • General Electric (GE)
    • General Motors (GM)
    • Google (GOOG)
    • Hewlett-Packard (HPQ)
    • Home Depot (HD)
    • Honeywell (HON)
    • IBM (IBM)
    • Intel (INTC)
    • Int'l Paper (IP)
    • JP Morgan Chase (JPM)
    • J & J (JNJ)
    • McDonalds (MCD)
    • Merck (MRK)
    • Microsoft (MSFT)
    • P & G (PG)
    • United Tech (UTX)
    • Wal-Mart (WMT)
    • Walt Disney (DIS)
  • TECH
    • ADVANCED
    • FEATURES
    • INTERNET
    • INTERNET FEATURES
    • CYBERCULTURE
    • eCOMMERCE
    • mp3
    • SECURITY
    • GAMES
    • HANDHELD
    • SOFTWARE
    • PERSONAL
    • WIRELESS
  • HEALTH
    • AGING
    • ALTERNATIVE
    • AILMENTS
    • DRUGS
    • FITNESS
    • GENETICS
    • CHILDREN'S
    • MEN'S
    • WOMEN'S
  • LIFESTYLE
    • AUTOS
    • HOBBIES
    • EDUCATION
    • FAMILY
    • FASHION
    • FOOD
    • HOME DECOR
    • RELATIONSHIPS
    • PARENTING
    • PETS
    • TRAVEL
    • WOMEN
  • ENTERTAINMENT
    • BOOKS
    • TELEVISION
    • MUSIC
    • THE ARTS
    • MOVIES
    • CULTURE
  • SPORTS
    • BASEBALL
    • BASKETBALL
    • COLLEGES
    • FOOTBALL
    • GOLF
    • HOCKEY
    • OLYMPICS
    • SOCCER
    • TENNIS
  • Subscribe to RSS Feeds EMAIL ALERT Subscriptions from iHaveNet.com RSS
    • RSS | Politics
    • RSS | Recipes
    • RSS | NFL Football
    • RSS | Movie Reviews
NATO Summit Unlikely to Answer the Most Important Questions
William Pfaff

HOME > WORLD

 

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

To adapt to secular use a phrase from medieval mysticism, "the cloud of unknowing" deepens as the war-waging countries of North America and Western Europe approach their NATO "summit." The phrase is appropriate because in the past it spoke not only of the unknown, but the unknowable.

The meeting's avowed purpose is to establish for the organization's members the meaning and purpose of what NATO actually is doing today in Afghanistan and elsewhere, and what it proposes to do in the future.

An answer to the first question is very difficult since the head of the Afghan government, upon whose supposed behalf NATO is conducting a gruesome and costly war, has demanded that the alliance alter its tactics in Afghanistan, and reduce its efforts, ceasing its interference in the affairs of its supposed political protege, at the same moment that NATO's generals intensify their threats against the Afghanistan government, should it continue to resist what its protector, the United States, continues to do to the Afghan people, which is to behave to them as if they were an occupied nation being dictated to by a foreign power, while being disciplined and harassed by foreign American soldiers whom the mass of Afghans do not wish to have in their country.

The policies of the Western powers today not only differ according to whether you are talking about (1) the United States, Britain and those countries who remain (generally unquestioning) Atlanticist allies, or (2) about other groups of alliance members, possibly doubtful about their position, or (3) about those other allies, for whom NATO's war in Afghanistan has lost all interest, making no sense to them, and having no relevance to the security situation of Canada, for example, or the major continental powers, Germany and France, having become a politically necessary indulgence of a United States whose policy in security matters no longer makes sense to its allies. (Or, for that matter, to many of America's citizens themselves, who, in the recent midterm elections, seem to have paid virtually no attention to the global trillion-dollar wars in which the nation is engaged in various parts of the Islamic world.)

American policy seems to these allies to be lost in fantasies as Alice was lost in a mathematician's logical joke, in which all was reversed from what existed in real life, on the other side of the looking glass.

Why is NATO in Afghanistan? Because the U.S. insisted that it force its way into that country to sponsor a formally democratic exercise of nominations and elections that have resulted in an ethnic minority-dominated government that Washington now accuses of corruption, and of resisting its supposed role as a cooperative American client government, and which has thus far proven incapable of training disciplined military and police forces capable of safeguarding the country against the insurgence of a substantial (and ethnically distinct) population minority. NATO went to Afghanistan in order to impose such a government upon the Afghan people, despite the resistance of certain groups.

Why does NATO not withdraw and allow the Afghan people to settle among themselves who it is that will govern them? Unlike during the Cold War, there is no foreign power outside Afghanistan that arms and steers the group that resists being governed by the NATO-allied authorities in Kabul. Why should NATO not leave the Afghans to settle this among themselves?

The only logical reason that can be put forward is that the NATO nations are afraid of the rebel movement of religious radicals, the Taliban, and fear that if it should succeed in Afghanistan, it will succeed elsewhere. Can this be taken seriously?

Why should the 28 member nations of NATO, a vast population composed of all of the great western industrial, military and nuclear powers, be afraid of the Taliban? Yet they seem to be, the American people first among them. It would seem to me to be absolutely essential that the NATO summit clarify in principle why NATO is in Afghanistan.

NATO was formed to defend Western Europe against the threat of a Soviet attack, and as an instrument by which a German army could be reconstituted on non-national terms. The postwar German army was not allowed a general staff. It is a NATO army under NATO command.

Those two original purposes have been achieved. Since the end of the Cold War, NATO has continued to exist chiefly out of bureaucratic inertia. It has lost its founding purposes, then it searched for and chose a new one, which was to become an auxiliary force to the U.S. in the conduct of American foreign policy, which is presented as the common policy of all the western democracies, though it is not.

This is an unsatisfactory arrangement. As the war in Afghanistan continues to demonstrate, the 27 other members of NATO are not uniformly in agreement with American foreign policy, and there seems to be no reason why the young men and women of the NATO nations should be sacrificed to this alien purpose, unless the publics of the affected nations have the question put to them of a national policy and national allegiance that serves interests defined by Washington, and not by their own governments.

At the NATO summit, these issues should be presented and debated. One doubts that this will occur, but eventually these questions will have to be addressed, and the people given answers.

 

William Pfaff's latest book: "The Irony of Manifest Destiny: The Tragedy of America's Foreign Policy"

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

 

Available at Amazon.com:

The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations?

Running Out of Water: The Looming Crisis and Solutions to Conserve Our Most Precious Resource

Bottled and Sold: The Story Behind Our Obsession with Bottled Water

Water: The Epic Struggle for Wealth, Power, and Civilization

The Great Gamble

At War with the Weather: Managing Large-Scale Risks in a New Era of Catastrophes

 

  • G20 Summit: Hitting Singles in Seoul
  • The Consequences of Fiscal Irresponsibility
  • GDP Now Matters More Than Force: Policy for the Age of Economic Power
  • What Population Growth and Decline Means for the Global Economy
  • Leading Through Civilian Power: Redefining Diplomacy and Development
  • The Future of American Power: Dominance and Decline in Perspective
  • Who Do You Call If You Want to Divide Europe?
  • The Game Changer: Coping With China's Foreign Policy Revolution
  • Why the Retirement Age Is Increasing
  • Religion's Growing Influence in International Politics
  • The Difficulty of Integrating Rising Powers
  • Ban-ki Moon Has United Nations 'Drifting Into Irrelevance'
  • Bachelet Faces Uphill Battle at U.N. Women
  • Murderous Tactics Fueling Terrorist Propaganda
  • Benjamin Netanyahu: A Hawk in the Ointment
  • Diminished Capacity
  • Moscow's Modernization Dilemma: Is Russia Charting a New Foreign Policy?
  • NATO Summit Unlikely to Answer the Most Important Questions
  • Franco-German Call for Change in the EU Meets with Much Opposition
  • A Tenuous Deal in Iraq
  • Conflict or Cooperation? Three Visions Revisited
  • A New Global Player: Brazil's Far-Flung Agenda
  • Pax Ottomana? The Mixed Success of Turkey's New Foreign Policy
  • Rise of the Mezzanine Rulers
  • Globalizing the Energy Revolution
  • Democracy in Cyberspace
  • The Digital Disruption
  • Africa: Agriculture's Final Frontier
  • A Reading List for the Twenty-first Century
  • Latin American Leaders Could Have Learned From South Korea
  • Region Ignoring Venezuela Coup Threats
  • To Fight Corruption, Start Cutting Red Tape
  • New Congress Won't Lead to 'Fortress America'
  • The Shifting Balance of Power
  • Checking China's Territorial Moves
  • Why China Has a Point About Quantitative Easing
  • China's Rate Hike: Winners and Losers
  • Taiwan's Shadow
  • Fools Rush in Where Europe Rushes Out
  • Germany to Muhammad: Go Home
  • Can NATO Nudge Russia Westward?
  • French Demonstrations Tell a Familiar Tale
  • Chavez a Pain for Spain
  • Nestor Kirchner's Death May Mark End of an Era
  • Petraeus Follows Iraq Formula in Afghanistan
  • Heavy Handed Intervention Has Stalled Arab-Israeli Peace Process
  • George Clooney Urges Obama and Media To Focus On Sudan
  • Fighting Hunger in Des Moines
  • Rise in Tourism to Miami May Signal Danger Ahead
  • Peru May Be Next Latin American Success Story
  • Nobel Winner Right About Risks of e-Books
  • Nestor Kirchner's Death May Mark End of an Era
  • Chavez a Pain for Spain
  • Economic Woes Put Brittle Nations on Edge
  • A Divided and Insular European Union
  • Do not Expect China to Budge on the Yuan
  • Why on Earth Does America Want a Stronger Chinese Currency?
  • Nuclear Club Has Yet Another Applicant
  • Nuclear Armament Still Our Central Issue
  • Embattled Islam
  • 'Europe Looks East' Hints at the Future
  • Choosing Between the Evil of Two Lessers In Afghanistan
  • Chavez Lost Ground but Will Fight Back
  • Education Too Important to Be Left in Government Hands
  • Latin America In Denial About the Quality of Its Schools
  • Millennium Development Goals for Women Largely Unmet
  • North Korean Succession Plans Are Shrouded in Mystery
  • Rogue BFFs North Korea and Iran Make Quite a Pair
  • American Role in Israeli-Palestinian Talks Is a Problem
  • Iraq Reluctant to Pay Its Fair Share of Security Costs
  • Iran's 'Shaky' Ahmadinejad
  • United States Could Be Alone as Europe Turns Inward
  • Hugo Chávez May Lose Even if He Wins
  • Brazil Needs Dose of Constructive Paranoia
  • Latin American Commodity Exporters Need to Diversify
  • Stoned on Righteousness
  • Our Man in Moscow
  • Widening Divide in American-Chinese Commercial Interests
  • The New Old World Order
  • Global Human-Rights Cause Gets a Shot in the Arm
  • Obama's Foreign Policy Performance
  • New Russia Takes Root in Saint Petersburg and Moscow
  • Dismantling Worst-Case Proliferation Scenarios
  • A Numbers Game in the Middle East
  • Middle East Peace Talks: Here We Go Again
  • Obama and Clinton Revive Middle East Peace Talks
  • Guess Who's Coming to the Table
  • Iraq: Unanswered Policy Questions on U.S. Troops
  • Iraq: Implications of a Pointless War
  • Iraq: Book Review
  • Iraq: No Drums and No Bugles: None Dare Call It Victory
  • Pakistan's Leadership Sustains Flood Damage
  • A French Leftist Ritual Takes on Sarkozy
  • United States Losing Latin America Market Share
  • The Power of Being Multilingual
  • Chavez's Obsession With Past Turns Creepy and He's Not Alone
  • Obama Could Help Stop Mexico's Bloodshed
  • Interdependency Theory: China, India and the West
  • The Dangerous Dog Days of Summer
  • The Next 500 Years
  • A New Plan For Nuclear Postures
  • Strengthening the Political - Military Relationship
  • Hydraulic Pressures: Into the Age of Water Scarcity?
  • South Korea: Prosperity and Anxiety
  • China Wealthy? That's Rich!
  • Islamism Unveiled: From Berlin to Cairo and Back Again
  • Beyond Moderates and Militants: Charting a New Course in the Middle East
  • Middle East Peace Talks: Pointless Talks
  • Why Israel Can't Rely on Deterrence Against Iran's Nuclear Program
  • How to Handle Hamas
  • Bringing Israel's Bomb Out of the Basement
  • Iraq: Anxious Iraqis Look at Uncertain Future
  • Iraq: U.S. Combat Troops' Departure Leaves Uncertainty in its Wake
  • Iraq: A Promise Kept?
  • An Unlikely Trio: Can Iran Turkey and the United States Become Allies?
  • Staying Power: The U.S. Mission in Afghanistan Beyond 2011
  • Long Road Ahead for Afghan Security Forces
  • Afghanistan's Dirty Little Secret
  • Russia's New Nobility
  • Mexico Needs U.S. Help But Not Troops
  • Mexico's Narco Problems Are Our Problems, and Vice Versa
  • No 'I' in 'Team,' but Plenty of 'I' in India
  • Afghanistan - There Can Be No Graceful Exit
  • Afghanistan Timetable Remains a Factor of Uncertainty
  • We Are Playing Fidel Castro's Game
  • Has the Time Come to Legalize Drugs?
  • Handling Tensions on the Korean Peninsula
  • Richard C. Holbrooke: Pakistan Aid Inadequate
  • Afghanistan Leaks Answer Few Questions
  • Afghanistan & The Karzai Problem
  • Afghanistan - Winds of Changing Policy
  • Obama's Juggling Act in the Middle East
  • Defusing Lebanon's Powder Keg
  • Germany's Good Fortune Tips the Scales Against its Neighbors
  • End Poverty: Export Capitalism
  • Haitian Quake Hasn't Dislodged Status Quo
  • Why We Go Back to Haiti
  • Iraq - Mission Accomplished II
  • The Fight Escalates Against Fake Drugs
  • China's Coal Addiction
  • Afghanistan: The Pentagon's Lost War
  • Afghanistan: The Cost of Nation Building
  • Afghanistan: Pentagon Papers Redux?
  • Behind Iraq's Long Political Indecision
  • Venezuela - Colombia Spat to Pass, Return
  • Will China Rule the World?
  • NATO's Future Involves More Global Partnerships
  • Gloom Awaits U.S. Climate Diplomacy
  • U.S. - U.K.: Difficult Duet in Afghanistan
  • 'Pariah of the Pacific' Has Ham-handed Grip on Fiji
  • Turkey Takes the Veil
  • For Israel a Two-State Proposal Starts With Security
  • Is It Too Late to Stop Iran
  • The Middle East's Private Little War
  • Reality and Reform for How the EU Keeps Its Peace
  • Chancellor Angela Merkel's Sinking Support
  • The Real Reason Why Afghanistan Is a Lost Cause
  • The War Drones On
  • When the 'Right War' Goes Wrong
  • The Afghanistan Paradox
  • Pakistan's Gambit in Afghanistan
  • Obama Wasting Opportunities in Latin America
  • Stopping Nuclear Proliferation Before It Starts
  • Veiled Truths: The Rise of Political Islam in the West
  • Steps to Stop Iran From Getting a Nuclear Bomb
  • Iran: The Nuclear Containment Conundrum
  • Iran: The Right Kind Of Containment
  • China Is the Key to Handling Nuclear North Korea
  • Coping With China's Financial Power
  • What China's Currency Reform Means For Investors
  • Russian-American Obstacles Overshadow Obama-Medvedev Meeting
  • Russia's Courtship of Silicon Valley
  • Ukrainian Blues: Viktor Yanukovych's Rise and Democracy's Fall
  • Russia: Prisoners of the Caucasus
  • The Afghan Challenge Is Far Tougher
  • New Guard, Old Policy on Afghanistan
  • Fear and Uncertainty in Afghanistan
  • Afghanistan: Bribing the Enemy
  • Afghanistan Poses Difficult Challenges
  • Defining Success in Afghanistan
  • Sad Stan, Famous Petraeus
  • The Challenge of Reconciliation in Kenya
  • The Tyranny of Unity in Zimbabwe
  • Mexico: The New Cocaine Cowboys
  • Under Santos Colombia Could Rise to the Next Level
  • Autocrats' Latest Weapon: Indirect Censorship
  • Latin America's Rich Should Be More Generous
  • Castrocare in Crisis

 

(C) 2010 William Pfaff

 

Recommend

Search Powered By Google

Google Search   

ADVERTISEMENT

Advertisement

Advertisement

ADVERTISEMENT

Job & Career Search

career & job search                    job title, keywords, company, location
  • HOME
  • WORLD
  • USA
  • BUSINESS
  • WEALTH
  • STOCKS
  • TECH
  • HEALTH
  • LIFESTYLE
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • SPORTS

World - NATO Summit Unlikely to Answer the Most Important Questions | Global Viewpoint

  • Services:
  • RSS Feeds
  • Shopping
  • Email Alerts
  • Site Map
  • Privacy