- LATIN AMERICA
- MIDDLE EAST
- United Kingdom
- United States
- New Zealand
- South Africa
Jack Fuller discusses his book 'What is Happening to News'
It can be hard to resist sensational news, from the "if it bleeds, it leads" priorities of local newscasts to the harangues of cable TV
pundits. Veteran newsman and Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Jack Fuller wants to know why. In his book,
What Is Happening to News: The Information Explosion and the Crisis in Journalism,
the former editor and publisher of the
What is happening to the news?
Maybe the best way to describe it is in terms of what is happening to the news audience. Some of the most basic things that are happening in the news are happening because the audience is changing. The thing that is most novel is how the information process in our heads is interacting with a radically new and different information environment. I don't just mean a news environment; I mean the total information environment: media, entertainment, E-mail, cellphones, all of it. We're living in a message-immersed environment. But what's different is that lots of the messages, whether they're marketing messages or personal messages, are addressed to us directly by name. The advertising messages that we get today are at least as personal as the personal messages we get. And we get them all the time because we're always available. And that creates significant new challenges for the brain.
What do you mean by that? Our brains aren't wired to process stuff that way?
We're wired to do a lot of things, and the brain is quite plastic. But there are some aspects in which it's still structured the way the brains of our distant ancestors were structured. Some of the mechanisms that persist there, in some respects, still continue to be very helpful for us.
So you're saying there are some messages our brains are not equipped to deal with?
Unfortunately, it's not so simple. We have quite limited processing resources in our heads. And the way we allocate those processing resources is significantly through the emotions. The emotions are, in fact, evolved to seize the information-processing resources of our brain and devote them to something that seems very important. Imagine an ancient ancestor on a savannah in
So is journalism dying, or is it evolving?
Well, it's changing dramatically. It's much, much harder for serious journalists, who have a deep feeling for the social or civic-education mission of journalism. It's harder for them to get attention and hold it.
Why? Because it's not emotional enough?
If you're going to write about the nuances of how we deal with financial-securities derivatives, you can put that in a screaming, terrifying way; but if you're trying to get people to understand the basics, it's not really easy to do that in today's environment. Not that it ever was. But now it's even harder, partly because there are many more things competing for attention.
Why should people care about socially minded or civic-education journalism?
Because almost all of these things that socially minded journalists and socially minded people think are important have huge impact on the lives and well-being of people. They're not important because they're philosophically important. They're practically important. How we deal with this complicated question of what to do about our financial insitutions and the regulation of them will be extremely important for our future. Healthcare is another thing, and it's very complicated. Getting people's attention and holding it to deal with complicated things is no small task. That's the challenge for today's generation of journalists.
What is journalism?
Journalism is a process by which people get some level of understanding about the things that shape their lives. And in a self-governing society, even though we know people don't decide policy directly, their general understanding of things does shape the way public-policy decisions are made. The quality of our public policy will, in part, turn on how civically educated the public is. You might not know it or think about it. But you might not think about food and drug regulations, until you come down with food poisoning.
So should news companies focus on making their news more emotionally charged?
We need to develop a way to talk about what professional and ethical constraints we have on the way we use emotion. I grew up aspiring to the definition of professional journalism that I learned. It involved verification, detachment, and emotional restraint. And neutrality. Now I think that some of those disciplines may make it difficult for journalism to reach people.
What advice would you give to students who are considering entering the field of journalism?
I think it's a terrifying and a thrilling moment for a young person. It's terrifying for obvious reasons: We don't know where it's going. On the other hand, for creative people, what a thrill. Your success is going to be measured by finding ways to tell stories and communicate information. And you're going to have to do that in a dramatically different way. It's sort of like an open field for creative people. For people who want to get into a predictable world, it's not a very attractive place. But frankly, the best journalists were never like that. I would never hesitate to encourage people to get into this.
Available at Amazon.com:
Why News Is Aimed At Your Emotions