Former CIA Operative Sees Terrorism Vulnerabilities
Counter-terrorism officer says there are gaps in homeland security defenses
You mention military bases as being at risk for an attack. What other facilities are at risk?
There are many types of installations that could be attacked to produce catastrophic results: liquid natural gas facilities, dams, rail and metro systems, hotels, bio research facilities, and the like. I went target set by target set and did research on them. I went out on the ground and started looking at examples of these facilities and having a look at the security. I went out and cased these facilities for at least a year, doing multiple casings a week of different targets. I was only turned away once.
Should you have been questioned?
Yes, undisputably. I didn't use operational techniques, go in disguise, for instance. I deliberately didn't use any secret tactics, sneaking around or the like. And I didn't break any laws in reporting this book. I wasn't playing games or anything. Most of it was just walking around the perimeter of these places.
What did you find?
We're not nearly as well protected as we need to be. It's not like there have been significant changes since 9/11 and I am debating if those measures are allocated in the right ways. In the vast majority of cases, absolutely nothing has changed since 9/11. Many security people are now billing themselves as counterterrorism specialists, whatever that means. But they have no idea how terrorists think or operate. What has happened is that we have lots of measures designed to prevent traditional security threats like vandalism, crimes where people are afraid to get caught. Those measures have very little to do with stopping a suicide attack, but we're putting them in place anyway. We're spending lots of money on things that are, in essence, corporate welfare. And we're leaving lots of simple, practical solutions untouched.
What are some of the useless measures?
Cameras are a great example. Sure, securing a chemical plant, for instance, involves [protecting against] many threats, vandalism, theft, and all sorts of other things. But if you are guarding against a car bomb or a truck bomb, a camera is a totally irrelevant piece of equipment. If a truck filled with explosives is driving towards your chlorine tank at 50 miles per hour, a camera is useless. The guy driving the truck doesn't care if his face is recorded, because he isn't planning to survive the attack. It might even help the bomber by recording the attack for publication.
That's exactly right. So, we need to think more about the threat we face rather than the threats we'd like to be facing.
Even the military gets it wrong. There are many military bases here in the U.S. where you just drive right up to a wooden swinging gate and show a photo ID to the guard. That is not even going to slow down the driver of a car filled with explosives with his foot on the gas pedal and planning to detonate himself inside the compound.
Since you left the CIA, you do consulting. Do you have any monetary interests here?
I do have a consulting business, but I don't have clients that I write about in the book. This is not a way to drum up business, and it's not written for security professionals.
Are low- or high-tech attacks more likely?
Both are dangerous, and both are likely. We have people who are self-radicalizing. The Fort Hood shooter, JihadJane, the guys in
Why do they choose the targets they do?
The first element is the psychology of what they are trying to accomplish. They are trying to terrify and scare you. The more attention it gets, the better. The
Of course that's true, but it's also used as a way to dismiss all criticism. We need to do a better job securing the places that have a potential to produce mass casualties. That should be a priority. Is that going to stop terrorists from driving a truck bomb into a
What's your worst fear?
Passenger rail. Something like
Available at Amazon.com:
Read the latest political news.
- Al-Qaeda has Lost the Battle. But has it Won the War?
- Former CIA Operative Sees Terrorism Vulnerabilities
- To Protect U.S. Against Cyberwar: Best Defense Is a Good Offense
- Cyberwar Rhetoric Scarier Than Threat of Foreign Attack
- Why Natural Disasters Are More Expensive But Less Deadly
- Detroit - What Will Detroit Be Like in 2020
- 2010 Census: We Don't Fit Neatly Into Little Boxes
- Ex-CIA man John Kiriakou on Abu Zubaydah, torture, and 'The Reluctant Spy'
- Terrorist Suspect JihadJane Shatters Stereotype
- Jihad Jane Shatters Terror Stereotype
- Jihad Jane Terrorists Who Defy Our Biases
- Terror and Sacrificing Privacy for National Security
- Supreme Court Takes Aim at Chicago Gun Ban
- On Our Co-Equal Branches
Former CIA Operative Sees Terrorism Vulnerabilities | Alex Kingsbury
(c) 2010 U.S. News & World Report