- LATIN AMERICA
- MIDDLE EAST
- United Kingdom
- United States
- New Zealand
- South Africa
- iHaveNet.com: Technology
by Clarence Page
After decades of covering or commenting on an endless parade of self-promoting celebrities and ambitious wannabes, I was startled to hear that the
That's the reason that
I'm not surprised that people would want to remove embarrassing stuff about themselves from
What surprises me is the court's reasoning. In a ruling that raises more questions than it answers, the court agreed to support part of a complaint filed by Mario Costeja Gonzalez against a Spanish newspaper that ran a brief factual news item article in 1998 about his auctioning his house to pay debts. He wanted the story removed from the newspaper and
The court surprised many by dropping the complaint against the newspaper but upholding Gonzalez' request to have
A person should be able to demand that a search engine remove links to data that "may be prejudicial to him or that he wishes it to be forgotten after a certain time," the court ruled.
In this era of self-promoting tweeters, social networkers and do-it-yourself media mini-moguls, talk about a "right to be forgotten" sounds almost treasonous to American ears. But it's old news to Europeans. As
Has somebody posted something about you on the Internet that you wish was not there? Consider moving to Europe. Nothing like the "right to be forgotten" is likely to happen here. Americans -- to our credit, in my view -- give greater value to the public's right to know.
Yet since any pinch on the Web in one country is soon felt around the world, some legal experts like Rosen warn that the "right to be forgotten" poses a threat to Internet freedom as we have known it.
They include, according to the
Judging by those descriptions, the requests to be "forgotten" may well include a number of people whom the public would prefer to remember.
Even so, there are Americans who would like to have something like a "right to be forgotten." In an eloquent defense of the high court's stance,
"Privacy allows us to experiment, make mistakes, and start afresh if we mess up," Posner writes. "It is this potential for rehabilitation, for second chances, that is under assault from
Fair enough. In the U.S., we may see some reforms, short of a "right to be forgotten," that don't offend free speech or the First Amendment. Class action suits, for example, have been filed in at least three states -- California, Florida and Ohio -- against websites that post arrest mug shot photos and charge extortion-like fees to have the photos taken down, the
Abuses like that should be curbed. But as a rule, freedom of expression works best on the Web. Once you turn censors loose, they seldom know when to stop.
Article: Copyright © Chatham House Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC