Congress Mulls Stricter Standards for Brokers
Humberto Cruz
As
Good for them.
"Over the years, full-service brokers have been allowed to portray themselves to the public as 'financial advisers'...all without having to act in their clients' best interests, which is the true hallmark of an advisory relationship," said
Roper and six other persons, each representing a different organization, sent a letter to
The administration's proposal authorizes - but does not obligate - the
The proposed legislation "represents a good starting point," the letter to Frank and Bachus says. But it calls for revisions to "unambiguously provide" for the extension of the fiduciary duty to brokers without "in any way" undermining current fiduciary requirements of registered investment advisers.
These advisers, who are regulated by the
"Few investors understand the stark differences" between the suitability and fiduciary standards, said
"
They are:
-- Put the client's best interests first.
-- Act with prudence; that is, with the skill, care, diligence and good judgment of a professional.
-- Do not mislead clients; provide conspicuous, full and fair disclosure of all important facts.
-- Avoid conflicts of interest, and
-- Fully disclose and fairly manage, in the client's favor, unavoidable conflicts.
Adoption and enforcement of the strict fiduciary standard for brokers would help reverse the current "horrible" level of distrust by the public of the financial services industry, said Rostad, regulatory and compliance officer at Rembert Pendleton Jackson in
So should all investors.
Recent Investing Articles Online
For More Investment Tips & Articles visit our Invetsing Section (Click Here)
Investing - Congress Mulls Stricter Standards for Brokers
(c) 2009 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.
