Despite Obama's Concessions, Russia Remains Unhelpful on Iran
Joshua Kucera

U.S. efforts are producing few results on nuclear problem

The Obama administration's announcement last month that it was scrapping plans to build missile defense sites in Poland and the Czech Republic removed a prime irritant in the U.S.-Russian relationship; Russians felt the missile defense network was targeted as much at them as against the purported threat, Iran. And the move appeared at first to pay dividends. Days later, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said Russia might support sanctions against Iran, a significant shift in policy and a concession to the United States.

But Washington's hopes took a hit last week. First, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov appeared to walk back that shift, saying, "Threats, sanctions, and threats of pressure in the current situation, we are convinced, would be counterproductive." Visiting China the next day, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin called talk of sanctions against Iran "premature." The snub was sharper because Lavrov's comments came shortly after he met Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in Moscow, where she had traveled to discuss a host of issues, including Iran, with Russian leaders. Russian media reported that Michael McFaul, a National Security Council expert on Russia who accompanied Clinton, said the United States would back off of criticism of Moscow's human rights record, another annoyance to Russia.

While Medvedev reportedly reiterated his position on Iranian sanctions privately to Clinton, it appears that the U.S. overtures have yet to bear fruit. "Whatever you want to call the Russian relationship with Iran--a partnership, a friendship, a marriage of convenience--whatever it is, the decision on the missile defense system in Europe has not made a major dent in it," says Alex Vatanka, senior Middle East analyst at Jane's Information Group.

Russia's relationship with Iran is complex, especially regarding the nuclear issue. Russia is deeply involved in Iran's nuclear power program, building a controversial reactor at Bushehr. And geopolitically, it sees Iran as a useful foil against the United States. But Russia has as much to lose from a nuclear-armed Iran as the United States does. Just as Washington is worried about an emboldened Tehran exerting increased influence in the Persian Gulf and the Levant, Moscow is uneasy about the same thing in Central Asia, a historic source of Russian-Iranian tension.

The difference between Russia and the United States, Vatanka says, is in the assessment of Iran's nuclear intentions. Russia has much greater access to information in Iran from diplomatic, commercial, and governmental contacts. "President Obama doesn't go and see the supreme leader of Iran. Putin does. Yeltsin did. And that might make the difference," he says. "The Russians are not blind to [Iran's nuclear potential], but they don't feel that the urgency is there, that there is an immediate threat."

Last week the U.S. and Russia did agree on something. The two countries, along with France, officially endorsed a U.N. plan to reduce Iran's stockpiles of uranium. Iran has yet to endorse the plan which could ease fears around the globe.

Sanctions are still a sticking point but at the end of Clinton's visit, Russian officials put a positive face on the apparent differences of opinion, with Lavrov saying sanctions were not impossible. "Sanctions become inevitable when absolutely all political and diplomatic means are exhausted," he said. But the key is at what point those means are exhausted. On that question, Washington and Moscow still seem as far apart as ever.

 

 

Victory in Afghanistan Requires Fully Supported Counterinsurgency
James Danly

In order to declare victory, we need to aid the Afghans in establishing a legitimate government whose population does not effectively support terrorist networks. The only viable course is to commit the resources necessary to conduct a full-spectrum counterinsurgency of the kind employed to such great effect during the surge in Iraq

Counterinsurgency Cookie Cutter Doesn't Fit Afghanistan
Gian P. Gentile

'Counterinsurgency' has become the new American way of war. A once obscure theory of internal conflict, it has become ubiquitous in military circles and dominates thinking on both current and future wars. More important, its precepts are being followed without serious inquiry or examination, and the U.S. military has become so enamored with the theory that it seemingly will not consider any serious alternative methods to achieve the president's objectives in Afghanistan.

Can United States Truly Press 'Reset' Button With Russia
Ian Bremmer and Alexander Kliment

Today, Moscow and Washington elites glower at each other over a host of global disputes, and Russia, far from blossoming into the pro-Western, market-oriented democracy that the 1990s shock therapists dreamed of, has developed into a quasi-authoritarian petro-state at home, guided by zero-sum revisionist ambitions abroad.

Arrogant U.S. Misses the Message From Pakistan's People
William Pfaff

There has always been in American foreign policy circles a virus called arrogance, caused by the hereditary assumption that Americans know better than others. Surprisingly, this does not always prove the case, but the condition seems highly resistant to treatment, even by experience. There seems a high probability that the disease has struck Obama administration policy circles dealing with Pakistan

For Europe, U.S. Is Country That Cries Wolf
William Pfaff

Officials such as Philip Gordon regularly travel to Europe to ask for support for American initiatives. The Europeans reply that they have not been consulted in making these policies. The Americans say we will be happy to discuss them, but we are putting up most of the men and money, so it's too late to change anything. Maybe next time.

With al-Qaida Diminished, There's No Sense in Expanding Afghan War
William Pfaff

Al-Qaida's relations with the Taliban today are troubled. Effective counter-terrorism strategy in Afghanistan is on the brink of completely eliminating al-Qaida. There will be no organization to return. This is the result of effective international and domestic intelligence cooperation as well as good police work. So why, one asks, is the U.S. expanding its war in Afghanistan?

Afghan Mythologies
Victor Davis Hanson

As President Obama decides whether to send more troops to Afghanistan, we should remember that most of the conventional pessimism about Afghanistan is only half-truth. Remember the mantra that the region is the 'graveyard of empires,' where Alexander the Great, the British in the 19th century, and the Soviets only three decades ago inevitably met their doom?

United States: Single-eyed Vision
Robert C. Koehler

The promise the United States once represented to the world has spent itself, and what we have to offer in terms of opportunity, or at least hope, is overshadowed by the spreading shadow of our hubris. And it's all coming home to roost.

Latin America Low on Obama's Priority List
Latin American Current Events, News & Affairs - Andres Oppenheimer

One year after the election of President Barack Obama, it's time to ask whether his ambitious campaign promises about Latin America are being fulfilled, or whether, like others before him, he has placed the region at the bottom of his foreign policy priorities. Let's look at Obama's key campaign promises for Latin America

In the Quicksands of Somalia
Bronwyn Bruton

The U.S. government needs to change its Somalia policy -- and fast. For the better part of two decades, international attempts to create a government have failed. And since 9/11, U.S. attempts to prevent Somalia from becoming a safe haven for al Qaeda have visibly backfired, alienating the Somali population, and propelling an indigenous Salafi jihadist group, called al Shabab, to power

Changing North Korea
Andrei Lankov

When it comes to dealing with North Korea the United States and its allies have no efficient methods of coercion at their disposal; the regime is remarkably immune to outside pressure. Its leaders cannot afford change, so they make sure their state continues to be an international threat, using nuclear blackmail as a survival tactic while their unlucky subjects endure more poverty and terror. Since outside pressure is ineffective

 

Receive Political Commentary Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner and iHaveNet.com

Russia - Despite Obama's Concessions, Russia Remains Unhelpful on Iran

 

(c) 2009 Tribune Media Services, Inc.