RSSKathy M. Kristof
The debate over health-care reform has given one topic short shrift: How would reform affect consumers?
While some of the details are not yet decided (and may not be fully decided for months), a picture is emerging that could help you better understand how buying health insurance could change under the proposals.
The key issues for consumers fall into two broad categories -- market reforms and coverage guarantees, said
Market reforms address how insurance companies can operate, and these changes are dramatic. Under existing law, insurers have the right to pick and choose their customers. They would not have that right under any of the reform proposals.
ACCESS
Insurance companies would be barred from refusing to cover "pre-existing medical conditions" and from denying coverage completely because of ailments that you already have or that run in your family.
In addition, the proposed laws would prevent companies from charging sick people so much for coverage that it would price them out of the market, Altman said.
"That's a sweeping change that touches everyone," Altman said. "You cannot get dropped or turned away if you lose your job or lose your insurance. And they cannot raise your rates to make it impossible for you to afford coverage."
MANDATES
The flip side of that coin: You would have to buy insurance, whether you want to or not.
All the proposals require that you buy health insurance or pay a penalty, usually in the form of a tax. The amount of the penalty is a moving target at the moment, but it would probably amount to some percentage of the cost of bare-bones coverage.
A lot of people have a teenage reaction to mandates -- they don't like being told what to do. But experts explain that mandates are necessary here because they would eliminate the inequity of today's system.
Under existing law, you can choose not to spend money on health insurance without worrying that you won't get care. Why? Federal law demands that you get treated, regardless of whether you are insured or can afford to pay, said
The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, passed in 1986, says that you cannot be refused treatment or transferred to another facility when you are in an unstable medical condition.
As a result, people who are not insured merely need to wait until their condition is bad enough. Then they can go to an emergency room and get treated free of charge -- or rather at a huge cost, but to taxpayers rather than themselves.
That law is also why debates about whether illegal immigrants would get health coverage under the law are spurious. Yes, they will. They get coverage now. It's a matter of whether they get coverage through an insurance program or through emergency rooms, as they do now.
"We are a compassionate society," Desser said. "We have already decided that we don't want people dying on the street when they can't afford care."
COVERAGE CHANGES
Whenever there's a mandate to buy coverage, the government also has to spell out what type of coverage meets that mandate. In other words, it has to create a model insurance policy that meets the requirements in the law.
Current proposals provide only a few details of what would be in these standard policies. Here's what we know so far:
-- All policies would provide hospital, physician and preventive care.
-- Young people would be able to buy a bare-bones policy called the "young and invincible" plan. It would have high deductibles and low premiums but would cover major medical.
-- The amount you have to pay for such things as co-payments and deductibles would be capped. Under current proposals, the most a family would have to spend would be about
-- Consumers would be able to choose from a group of standardized policies, some of which would offer lower premiums but higher deductibles. Other policies would offer high-end coverage but at a higher monthly cost.
-- Subsidies would be provided to people who could not afford insurance premiums or the cost of their deductibles and co-insurance. Currently, those subsidies would kick in for anyone with income below 300 percent of the federal poverty guidelines. These guidelines vary based on family size and location. A family of four living in the continental U.S. would get the subsidy up to about
The most contentious coverage debate boils down to this:
"There is a big balancing act going on between the cost of the legislation and the adequacy of the subsidies and the coverage itself," Altman said. "A lot of this is going to be tweaked several times as this goes through the process."
Medicare Costs Key to Healthcare Reform
Kent Garber
About 45 million elderly or disabled people get their health insurance from Medicare. In 2008, it cost the government about $450 billion. The figure is growing rapidly, consuming ever larger chunks of the federal budget, something Congress desperately wants to fix as part of healthcare reform. But as events last week showed, Congress so far isn't up to the task.
Senior citizens are more opposed to Obama's healthcare plans than any other age group
Kenneth T. Walsh
One of President Obama's biggest challenges this fall will be persuading seniors to accept his healthcare proposals. Many elderly voters are deeply worried about 'Obama-care' because they fear that his plans will reduce their coverage and increase their costs. Seniors, in fact, are more opposed to Obama's healthcare ideas than any other age group.
Obama's Never Ending Healthcare Campaign
Kenneth T. Walsh
On issue after issue, every imaginable political organization, constituency group, and self-styled movement seems to feel it necessary not only to state its case but to wage an election-style campaign to advance its interests. The goal is to mobilize public opinion and take on the opposition, often by using hype, distortion, negativity, and name calling.
To Cut Health Care Costs, Let's Start With the Secret Prices
Bernadine Healy M.D.
As President Obama said again in his recent address to Congress, an imperative for health reform is containing runaway health costs. Look at a colonoscopy: When paid by Medicare, the fee is roughly $450. Consumers' ignorance of what services truly cost blurs the connection between their rising insurance premiums and prices, setting the stage for those prices to soar ever higher.
Time for Some Hard Choices on Health Reform: Revenue-neutral is not enough
Mortimer B. Zuckerman
Cost is the central dilemma facing the ambitious healthcare reform plan of President Obama to introduce a universal, new system of healthcare that will extend coverage to millions of people of limited means. Quite simply, it threatens to break an already fractured bank.
Health Reform Could Get You Hired
Liz Wolgemuth
If healthcare reform makes insurance much more affordable to individuals and businesses, it could result in a greater variety of career options for workers. For one thing, it would reduce barriers to entrepreneurship. Reform also could make it easier for workers to leave employers to whom they are job-locked, or committed to solely for health benefits--a situation more common to older workers and those with pre-existing conditions.
The Baucus Healthcare Plan: What Small-Business Owners Need to Know
Matthew Bandyk
The Senate Finance Committee put forth a new healthcare bill that removes those penalties on businesses. Instead, it offers carrots to employers that provide healthcare, while keeping a few sticks. The bill, associated with its main sponsor, Democratic Sen. Max Baucus of Montana, seeks to expand insurance coverage through the creation of nonprofit insurance exchanges at the state level. These exchanges will be open to small businesses with up to 100 employees
Individual Mandate Would Be a Healthcare Industry Boondoggle
Dick Armey
Only the most blinkered of partisans can look at the "individual mandate" and not see it as the answer to the health insurance industry's prayers. It is a law that forces everyone to buy its product. What industry would not want this. That's what the individual mandate does for the health insurance industry. Not only would it force us to buy health insurance, but the 535 members of Congress, after hearing from every health insurance lobbyist in Washington, would decide exactly what coverage we need.
An Individual Mandate for Health Insurance Would Benefit All
William H. Frist
Let's face it, in a country as productive and advanced as ours, every American deserves affordable access to healthcare delivered at the right time. And they don't have it today. It is time for an individual health insurance mandate for a minimum level of health coverage. Catastrophic coverage would be an appropriate place to start.
Healthy Living is the Key to Healthcare Savings
Mark M. O'Connell and Tim Kaine
As final negotiations on health insurance reform continue, the debate has centered on achieving three basic goals: more security for insured Americans, affordable and quality insurance for the uninsured, and strategies to reduce the unsustainable growth in healthcare costs. There are many different ideas about how to accomplish these objectives. All agree, however, that the end goal of reform is individual health.
No Such Thing as an Unpaid Bill
Carl Hiaasen
My favorites are the few beet-faced droolers who show up at town-hall meetings to rail against government involvement, while simultaneously warning President Obama to 'keep your hands off my Medicare' -- the biggest, costliest, most socialistic government program in U.S. history. It's also a program that happens to work, although not nearly as efficiently as it could.
Healthcare Industry jobs
Find your next job in the Healthcare Industry. Search Healthcare jobs from thousands of job and career search sites.
Healthcare - How Health-Care Reform Affects Consumers
(c) 2009 Kathy M. Kristof