Why the 'Pro-Growth Centrists' are Wrong
Robert B. Reich
Some self-styled "pro-growth centrists" in the
They're wrong. Fairness isn't inconsistent with growth. It's essential to it. The only way the economy can grow and create more jobs is if prosperity is more widely shared.
For years, conservative "supply-side" economists have told America not to be worried about widening inequality. They've said tax cuts for corporations and the rich will lead to more economic growth and jobs.
It's been a cruel hoax. Nothing has trickled down. The Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 -- the lion's share of whose benefits went to the wealthy -- ushered in an era of slow growth, fewer jobs, declining wages and mammoth budget deficits.
You want to know the real reason the economy crashed in 2008 and why the recovery has been so anemic? Because so much of the nation's income and wealth have become concentrated at the top that America's vast middle class doesn't have enough purchasing power to keep the economy going.
This was masked when the middle class borrowed billions of dollars against the rising values of their homes. But since the housing and debt bubbles burst, borrowing on that scale is no longer an option.
The richest 1 percent of Americans save about half their incomes, while most of the rest of us save between 6 percent and 10 percent. Being rich means you already have most of what you want and need. Each additional acquisition yields a sharply declining level of satisfaction: That second yacht isn't nearly as exciting as was the first.
So when the top 1 percent rakes in more than 20 percent of total income -- twice the share it had 30 years ago -- there's insufficient demand for all the goods and services the economy is capable of producing at or near full employment. Without enough demand, the economy can't grow or generate nearly enough jobs.
Many of these same "pro-growth Democrats" wish the president would stop attacking
I think the president should go even further and take on all of
Private equity along with the rest of the financial sector is a big part of the problem. It's responsible for much of the concentration of income and wealth at the very top, and the distress still felt in the rest of the economy after the Street nearly melted down in 2008.
The financial sector has turned a significant part of the American economy into a giant casino involving large bets with other people's money. When the bets go well, the rich owners of the casino (
The casino requires continuous subsidies from ordinary taxpayers. Some are built into the tax code. One is the preference of debt over equity (interest on debt is tax deductible), which rewards
Another is the "carried interest" rule that, absurdly, allows private-equity managers (like
A third is the invisible government guarantee that if the biggest banks get into trouble, taxpayers will bail them out. This reduces the big banks' cost of capital relative to other banks and fuels even more risky lending.
How does the financial sector maintain these tax subsidies and hidden guarantees while eluding effective regulation? Follow the money. Its wealth gives it huge political clout.
None of this is fair. It's also bad for economic growth and jobs, as we've so painfully witnessed.
The president should be talking about fairness AND growth and jobs, explaining why we can't have the latter without the former, and why casino capitalism jeopardizes both.
Read the latest political news.
- Of Bedrooms and Boardrooms
- Budget Cut Blues: America Needs More Informed Citizenry
- Pentagon Spending Spree
- Why the 'Pro-Growth Centrists' are Wrong
- Social Security's Dual-Income Trap
- Mitt Romney Must Find Tactical Advantage
- New Marco Rubio Faces Key Test
- Mitt Romney's Pitch to Hispanics Won't Work
- Turning the Other Cheek to Donald Trump
- Trampling the Right to Vote
- Ham-Handed Solution to a Problem That Doesn't Exist
- New Florida Voter Purge Should Come As No Surprise
- Romney and Bain: Actual 'Entitlement Society' in Action
- An 'Independent' Super PAC Demonstrates Supreme Court's Folly
- On Picking an Unprepared Vice-President
- Fat Cat Urged to Bankroll Anti-Obama Hatefest
- The Massachusetts Indian War of 2012
- Chameleon Nation
- Cabinets Gone Wild
- Which Kind of Capitalism? A Debate for Obama and Romney
- More Campaign Surrogate Blunders
- Are We Better Off Than in 2008?
- The Defeat of a Man of Reason
- Our Politics is a Mess, But Only One Party is The Cause
- Right-Wing Rage Trips Itself
- 'Money Primary' Pushes Obama to the Left
- Mitt Romney's Stellar Performance
- A Campaign Treading Water
- Mitt Romney Feeds the Crocs
- The Power of the Incumbency
- Demise of a Centrist Nominee Dream
- The Media's Religion Deficit
- Crushing College Dreams
- We Can't Afford Energy Subsidies and Tax Breaks
- The Truth's Liberal Tilt
- Mitt Romney's Media Handicap
- George Bush's Pithy Endorsement
- Spending Debate Creates an Opportunity for Mitt Romney
- The State of the Military-Industrial Complex Is Strong
- Republicans Have Bad Brains?
- The Citizen and the Government
- The President's 'Other Gospel'
- Voter IQs Need Refresher Course
- Cliches Conservatives Say
- Generation Pap
- Are Government's 'Strategic Communications' Coming to American Airwaves?
- The Job Stall
- Who Lost Latin America?
- United States Unlikely To Condemn Argentina's 'Outlaw Behavior' -- Yet
- French Elections Lesson
- Companies Save Big On Corporate Taxes With the Help of Lobbyists
- Happy Anniversary, or Partisan Boasting?
- On Losing Control of the Message
- My Papers? No Thank You
- Pothole Nation
- Why Being 'On The Right Track' Isn't Enough
- The Poor as Collateral Damage
- The Real Deal About College Costs
Why the 'Pro-Growth Centrists' are Wrong | Politics
(c) 2012 Tribune Media Services, Inc.