Washington, Are You Listening?
The Bush tax cuts siphon off money that could fund education and other crucial programs
Patrick Pylvainen grew up in a small town outside Minneapolis. The Minneostan college student has seven siblings, so he borrows money for his tuition — Stafford loans from the federal government, plus loans from private banks that require interest payments while he's still in school. Now, those more affordable federal loans are in jeopardy.
The cascade of federal budget cuts expected to begin in January would slash every single program the government classifies as "discretionary," including funding for education. That's heartbreaking, since public investment in education was a driving force behind historic U.S. prosperity. And an advanced degree is Patrick's ticket to his dream job as a problem-solver in health care policy.
Secretary of Education Arne Duncan recently announced that looming budget cuts will pull funding from student loan programs. That will make it more difficult for students to get timely information about financial aid and could even prevent young people like Patrick from enrolling in college. And that's not all. Duncan said 1.8 million kids will be affected by reduced aid to disadvantaged public schools, while as many as 100,000 very young at-risk kids could lose access to early-childhood education through the Head Start program. These changes will be the law of the land if January's scheduled budget cuts are allowed to take effect.
But this isn't how it has to be. Instead of slashing these programs, our lawmakers could simultaneously provide ample funding for education while reducing deficits. One of the most heated debates this election season is what to do about the Bush-era tax cuts, which are scheduled to expire at the end of the year. Those tax cuts aren't often mentioned in the same breath as education funding, but they should be.
That's because the Bush tax cuts siphon off money that could fund education and other crucial programs.
Consider this: In 2012, those in the top 1 percent will enjoy, on average, a $70,250 tax break. That's money that could go toward higher education, Head Start, and public schools across the nation. Lawmakers should let some or all of the Bush tax cuts expire to raise trillions of dollars over the next decade — and to prevent deep cuts to federally funded education.
Some lawmakers say we can't let the Bush tax cuts expire even for the super rich, arguing it would harm job creation. But level-headed research suggests that reverting to pre-Bush tax rates would have only very small effects on the behavior of those top earners. Meanwhile, the benefits of greater tax revenue — including higher graduation rates and a more skilled workforce — would far outweigh any losses.
Would most Americans get behind such a move? In a word, yes. There's strong support (62 percent) for increasing education funding, even in the context of budget deficits. And a recent Gallup poll found that six in 10 Americans believe wealthy taxpayers aren't paying their fair share. This is our chance to reduce deficits and invest in education for the long-term prosperity of the United States. Washington, are you listening?
Read the latest political news.
- Obama Leads Romney in Post-Conventions Poll
- Character, Policy and the Selection of Leaders
- The Politicization of Violence
- The Selling of American Democracy: The Perfect Storm
- Erasing W
- Losing Latino Votes
- The Party is Over: Longtime GOPer Dissects Modern Political Landscape
- Paul Ryan's Faux Populism
- Rise Up, Middle Class, Rise Up!
- A Modest Proposal: Three Weeks of Paid Vacation
- The Paul Ryan Choice
- Mitt Romney's Misguided Blue-Collar Voting Bloc
- What Mitt Romney Could Do to Connect with Hispanics
- Romney and the Republican Club
- Hurricane Isaac's Impact on the GOP
- Five Things Romney Needs from GOP convention
- The Goldwater Legacy
- Mitt Romney Risks 'Hispanic Debacle' in November
- Mitt Romney Runs Away from his Running Mate
- Paul Ryan's Magical Thinking
- Mitt Romney Finds Love in the GOP
- What Ryan Says About Romney
- Romney-Ryan: Real change
- Obama vs Romney: Meanest campaign ever?
- That's Joe Biden
- Mitt, More Gaffes Like This, Please
- Muzzle Mitt Romney on Taxes Now?
- A Debate About Debates
- Decoding Mitt Romney's Odd Humor
- After Romney Birth Certificate Joke, Dems Play the Race Card
- The 'Boring' 2012 Presidential Campaign
- Mitt Romney's 'Welfare Queen'
- Mitt Romney's Opportunity
- We're All Subsidizing Free Lunches for America's CEOs
- Washington, Are You Listening?
- Class Warfare
- Indefensible: The Truth About Pentagon Spending
- David Barton's Make-Believe Version of American History
- Onward Christian 'Teavangelicals'
- Campaigns Touch Briefly on the Wars
- 'Mad Dog' Harry Reid
- Republican Woes with Women
- Rape, Patriarchy and the Bomb
- Akin Offers Unflattering Glimpse of Widely Shared Republican Attitudes
- Todd Akin's 'Legitimate' Pain
- Todd Akin's Idiocy is Infectious
- Todd Akin's Ignorance Hardly Unique
- The Decline of Party Power
- Trapping Season
- Mitt Romney's 'Zero-Percenters'
- No More Boring White Guys for the GOP
- Eating America's Seed Corn
- Romney and Ryan Project Vague Foreign Policy
- A Storied Presidency
- There is No California
- The Koch Brothers' Moonshine
- No Need for a Witch Hunt Over Executive Pay
- US National Debate is a Disgrace
- Romney Lauds Israel's Socialized, Federally Controlled Health Care System
- A Solution to the Problem of Roaring Mouths Saying Nothing
- What Should Come First, Partisan Advantage or National Security?
- How Mitt Romney Got His
- Mitt Romney: Put up or Shut Up
- Is Obama's Best Hope The Inadequacy of His Rival?
Washington, Are You Listening? | Politics
Distributed via OtherWords (OtherWords.org)