The Media and Chris Christie: Going Overboard in New Jersey
by Jonah Goldberg
What a bizarre spectacle. Assuming he did not lie during his marathon news conference, the feeding frenzy surrounding
I'm not referring to the scandal itself; that's easy enough to understand. What Christie's team did was outrageous and deserves as much foofaraw and brouhaha as the
What's harder to grok is the hysteria at the national level.
For starters, there have been countless greater outrages at the state level that have received far less national coverage. (Indeed, there have been national scandals under President Obama that have received less intense national coverage.) Since 1961, four
"Meet the Press" dedicated 33 minutes to the
Many conservatives see liberal media bias in all this. But that diagnosis misses the fact that this was the 50th anniversary of the War on Poverty, giving producers ample opportunity to advance a liberal agenda. Moreover, Christie is actually quite popular in establishment media circles -- the sort of politician Sunday-show liberals insist America needs more of. He's also quite unpopular in many quarters of the right.
If there is a secret left-wing cabal interested solely in advancing the liberal cause through the media, the Christie auto-da-fé was a missed opportunity.
A more plausible partial explanation is partisan bias, which can be hard to distinguish from liberal bias in many outlets since it tends to favor Democrats. The key difference is that partisan bias focuses more on the political interests of specific politicians or a party generally.
Feeding-frenzy defenders insist the closure of lanes on the
The allegation that the Obama administration used the
And in the same week the media succumbed to St. Vitus' dance over Christie's alleged "cover-up," it was revealed that the
Christie is widely seen as a threat to whoever the Democratic nominee will be. Unlike some recent
That probably explains the overkill as much as anything. Christie is new, exciting and interesting in ways Obama once was. The difference is that when Obama was new and exciting, the media were biased in every regard and heroically skeptical of any Obama wrongdoing. "We thought he was going to be ... the next messiah,"
Christie, like most Republicans, never benefited from such skepticism, and never will.