Paul Ryan: Chairman of the Con Man Committee
It's hard to take Paul Ryan's proposal seriously
Call me a cynic, but it's been my experience that when politicians say they're going to lower your taxes, it's not your taxes they're talking about.
Take, for example, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan's new (actually recycled) tax plan. The Wisconsin Republican proposes cutting federal income taxes, bringing down top rates from their current 35 percent to 25 percent. The lowest brackets would drop to 10 percent from 15.
He's also suggesting lowering corporate taxes in various ways and has rejected raising the paltry capital gains tax. He's not just for cutting, of course. He also wants to boost military spending.
When asked how he's going to make up for the hole in the budget his plan would open, he becomes vague.
"You can't go out there with a detailed formula until there's a consensus that we need to broaden the base and reduce rates," he told The New York Times. "We need hearings in the light of day, with no back-room dealings. If we can't afford to retain certain tax breaks, then let's have a debate about it."
Right. A consensus in Congress. That shouldn't be too hard to get.
He would make up for the trillions in lost revenue by trimming some frivolous government programs, like Medicare and education for example, and get the rest by closing "loopholes."
Who is this guy, Candide?
It's hard to take Ryan's proposal seriously.
In the first place, virtually the entire Republican membership of the House has taken a blood oath never to raise taxes. They've actually signed a document promising not to. And you can't close loopholes without, by definition, raising taxes.
In the second place, Washington is home to a huge, well-paid army of lobbyists whose job it is to get subsidies, favorable regulations, and tax breaks for their clients. They're good at their job.
Whenever their clients' interests are in danger, they swarm to the Capitol armed with arguments, valid and specious, and ready cash. They don't always get their way, but they've got a terrific batting average.
In the third place, Congress is always going to have trouble creating a fair tax structure, partly because lawmakers can't agree on what "fair" is.
Is it a progressive system in which the well-off pay more than the not-so-well-off because they've benefitted from the system more? You can make that case, as the Bible does in the Apocrypha: "If thou hast abundance, give alms according; if thou have but little, be not afraid to give according to that little."
But you can also make a case, as flat-tax advocates do, that real fairness demands that everybody pays an equal share of his or her income to support society.
If the federal government tried to institute a true flat tax, however, it would have a revolution on its hands.
Such a tax would not merely require a uniform tax rate for rich and poor; it would eliminate all deductions and subsidies, without exception.
For example, consider what would happen if the government were to eliminate the deduction of home mortgage interest. Homeowners would be outraged and the entire real estate industry would be howling as home sales plummeted.
If deductions for business meals were no longer deductible -- on the theory that if you want to do business you can use your office and eat on your own nickel -- the National Restaurant Association's lobbyists and leaders would surround the Capitol, armed with pitchforks.
And if lawmakers were to take away deductions for charitable contributions, the nation's do-gooders would rise up as one to smite every member of Congress.
Local and state governments would be up in arms if Washington tried to take away the federal deduction for the taxes they levy.
And on and on and on.
It's hard to tell whether Ryan is a dreamer or a con man at this point. If we wanted a dreamer, Ralph Nader would be president.
Read the latest political news.
- How Everyone Else Pays for Big Business's Tax Breaks
- No Easy Solutions for Big Money in Politics
- GOP: That Great Enemy of Reason
- GOP's Presidential Plans in Peril if Economy Keeps Improving
- Mitt Romney's Woman Woes
- Can Republicans Regain Women Voters?
- Independent Ladies Pick Obama
- Republicans Can Close the 'Gender Gap' With the Economy
- Free The Markets, Mitt Romney
- Obama and Romney Struggling With Working Class Voters
- Mitt Romney Turns Attention to Contrasts With President Obama
- The Mitt Romney Veepstakes Begin
- Tool Or Hero: What Role Will Marco Rubio Play?
- Paul Ryan: Chairman of the Con Man Committee
- Paul Ryan's Medicare Hot Air
- Grand Old Pedagogy
- For Government: No Limits
- Parties Begin Staking Out Ground For a Budget Deal
- Rich Freeloaders
- Obama Will Not Stand Up for His Party's Politics
- How the Rich Welch on Retirement Taxes
- Invoking Fake Job Creators to Cut Taxes on the Rich
- Down and Out on Wall Street
- Enemies of the People
- The 99 Percent Spring
- The Most Lopsided Economic Recovery On Record
- Massachusetts Health Care Reform from the Front Lines
- Health Care Jujitsu
- Freedom or Fairness in 2012?
- Obama Energy Policy: Very Few of the Above
- Faith-Based Energy Policy
- Obama Unleashed
- Five Economic Mistakes Obama is Making
- Better Public Schools Require a Stronger Safety Net
- Catching up to the Local Food Revolution
- Taxation without Representation
- Partisanship Bickering Hangs Over Immigration Hearing
- Women Agree With the GOP on Birth Control
- Has Obama Gone Too Far in His Rhetoric About the Supreme Court?
- The Second Oil Revolution
- An America in Decline
- Romney's Russia Remarks and the Dangers of Dumbed Down
- Volatile Times, Uncertain Futures
- The Crisis in Public Morality
Paul Ryan: Chairman of the Con Man Committee | Politics
Distributed via OtherWords (OtherWords.org)