How the Tea Party Brings Back the 1960s
In the early 1960s children of the baby boom sparked a new social-political movement to take on the Establishment, tackle poverty, bring world peace and get "government" in the form of the military draft off their backs.
Almost a half-century later, many members of that same generation can be found in a new uprising, the "tea party" conservatives for whom the TEA stands for "taxed enough already."
The two movements have obvious differences, but I am most fascinated by how much they have in common:
The tea partiers want freedom from obligations imposed by "big government" but not its benefits. They have more gripes than solutions and,
as much as they call for "personal responsibility," they tend not to mind so much receiving the biggest items in the federal budget:
I am not alone in noticing these ironies.
A spirited debate has blossomed among the chattering classes as to how much the tea party conservatives have in common with the New Left in the 1960s -- or not.
A "radical individualism" links the two movements, says Lilla.
"Anarchistic like the Sixties, selfish like the Eighties, contradicting neither, it is estranged, aimless, and as juvenile as our new century. It appeals to petulant individuals convinced that they can do everything themselves if they are only left alone, and that others are conspiring to keep them from doing just that. ... Welcome to the politics of the libertarian mob."
Yet other experts like activist-turned-author and professor
As a close observer of that era as a collegiate student journalist, I would argue that Gitlin is correct at least about the beginnings of the New Left before it grew in a matter of years too large for its founders to corral. But devolution happens faster these days. If the founders of the New Left were rigorously obsessed with structure, organization, agendas and position papers, the later offshoots like the Yippies and their "revolution-for-the-hell-of-it" bear a strikingly similar resemblance to today's right-wing insurgents and their call for galvanizing call for "big government" to "follow the Constitution" and "leave us alone!"
Energized by rage, connected by the Web, cable TV, talk radio and other new media, the tea partiers actually take pride in their lack of formal leaders, structure, agenda or platform. I used to call the Yippie and "black power" movements "a slogan in search of an agenda." The tea party seems to think they're better off with just the slogans.
Such a deal.
Without an agenda, structure or leaders to grapple with their many gripes, the tea partiers have no obligation to actually come up with
solutions. After years of calling for people to lift themselves up by their bootstraps, as
I'm not saying that tea party people don't work hard or pay a lot of taxes. I feel their pain. But for all of our complaints about
"earmarks" and "waste, fraud and abuse," those two worthy efforts won't come close to paying for popular entitlement programs like
"Throw the bums out," the protesters cry. Fine. But what do we tell the new bums who come in?
Available at Amazon.com:
Read the latest political news.
- Do Great Leaders Make History or Are They Carried Along by the Tides of Change
- The Learning Curve of Peace
- Financial Reform's Uncertain Promise
- Election Day: The Calm Between Two Storms
- Election Day: The Morning After
- How the Tea Party Brings Back the 1960s
- The Republicans' Tea Party Problem
- 2010 Elections: A Warning to Incumbents
- Specter and Critz Results Send Mixed Messages for Democrats
- 2010 Elections: Violating a Cardinal Rule of Politics
- The Crippling Price of Public Employee Unions
- Obama: Over the Rainbows
- Left Right and Wrong
- Rand Paul: Radical Rookie
- BP Oil Spill: And a Child Shall Lead Them
- Texas State Board of Education: Textbook Wars
- A Crack in the School-Choice Dike
- To the Graduates
- Toxic Talk: Poison in the Air
- Congress Looks for Answers After Gulf Oil Spill
- Gulf Oil Spill Has High Stakes for Obama
- Why Republicans Will Win in the 2010 Elections
- Hot Races to Watch This Fall
- Top Fundraising Senate Campaigns
- Top Fundraising House Campaigns
- Self-Funded Candidates Make Waves in 2010 Senate Election Races
- Female Corporate Executives Shaking Things up in Political Races
- Voters See Debt Crisis. Why Doesn't Washington?
- Democrats Game Plan: Play Offense
- Can Obama Save Democratic Party
- Money Could Decide 2010 Midterm Elections
- First Lady's Popularity Could Give Boost to Administration's Agenda
- Pure Parties Are Losing Parties
- Clear Principles Win Elections
- Obama's Political Dream Team
- Tea Party Movement Could Help or Hurt Republicans
- Mapping a New GOP Majority
- Elena Kagan: Obama's Pragmatic Court Choice
- 10 Things You Didn't Know About Elena Kagan
- Afghanistan: Papering Over Afghan Woes
- Slipping a Mickey to California Democrats
- The Robert Bennett Message
- I've Been Thinking About Women in Government
- Why Politicians Should Lie
- Politics, Always Politics
- Still the Optimist
- Living with Risk is the Cost of Freedom
- Naysaying Anti-Terrorism Success
- Sounds of Insecurity
- The Death of the Tea Party Movement
- Life in the Age of 'Much Worse Than We Thought It Would Be'
- Guns vs. Butter 2010
How the Tea Party Brings Back the 1960s | Politics
(c) 2010 Clarence Page