Editorial Cartoon by David Horsey

Government-run Healthcare Would Backfire, Making 'Public Option' the Only One: Former DNC chair's government-run insurance program is sure to backfire. Just ask his wife the doctor

Former Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean has recently inserted himself into the debate on health reform, creating a website and collecting signatures on a petition calling for a "public option" as part of any health reform bill.

The action is unsurprising from an individual who previously called President Obama's healthcare reform plan "perfect" and stated that "it's ridiculous to say care would be inferior" in the government-run plan.

But even as Governor Dean attempts to attract support for government-run healthcare, it's worth pointing out that the facts --not to mention his own personal experience-- don't mesh with his rhetoric.

As Vermont's governor, Dean aggressively pursued expansions of government-run health insurance -- and bragged that doing so "was very cheap to do." Unfortunately for beneficiaries on state-run Medicaid and children's health insurance, that "cheap" coverage often came at a very steep price.

Low reimbursement rates mean that few doctors actually participate in the government-run plan, so patients can't see their personal physician -- and may not be able to see any physician when they need one.

In Vermont, one of those physicians whom Medicaid beneficiaries couldn't visit was Judith Steinberg -- Howard Dean's wife.

In 1998, low reimbursement rates -- coupled with the impact of additional regulations her husband signed into law -- prompted Dr. Steinberg to end participation in the state's largest Medicaid-managed care program.

As a result, the residents of Shelburne in Vermont's largest Medicaid plan lost access to the only primary care provider in town who would accept their insurance.

I don't fault Dr. Steinberg for her decision -- it may well have been the only rational business decision for her to make.

But for Governor Dean to claim that a government-run plan won't be "inferior" is to ignore his wife's experience, and that of the many beneficiaries who lost access to their physician due to Medicaid bureaucracy and poor coverage.

My fear is that creating a government-run health insurance plan wouldn't guarantee quality care by physicians -- in fact, it will not guarantee care at all.

The quality of care in a government-run health plan may seem irrelevant to those individuals who are happy with the coverage they currently have -- after all, President Obama promised during his campaign that, "If you like the plan you have, you can keep it."

But most individuals don't really have their own health coverage -- they get it from their employers. And if the coverage provided in the government-run plan is cheaper than what employers are paying now, logic suggests that employers will drop their current plans and place their workers in the government plan.

Estimates from independent actuaries at the Lewin Group suggest that well over half of all Americans currently with employer-sponsored health coverage -- nearly 120 million individuals -- would lose their current coverage due to the creation of a government-run health plan. And the change in coverage would not be a "choice" -- according to Lewin studies, employers would drop their plan options, dumping employees into the government-run health plan to save money.

So the end result of the "perfect" plan supported by Governor Dean would be most people losing the coverage they have, while ending up on a government-run plan that dominates the healthcare marketplace.

Physicians would be forced to accept the government's low reimbursement rates--but my experience, to say nothing of Dr. Steinberg's, strongly suggests that many will not. Some baby boomer doctors may view a move to government-run health insurance as a reason for them to take early retirement.

Some physicians may refuse all insurance entirely, relying solely on a "cash-and-carry" approach to treating patients.

Other physicians may be forced to lay off staff to compensate for a sharp drop-off in income. And other would-be physicians may decide not to practice at all -- forsaking medical school for other careers that could be more rewarding and less bureaucratic than government-dictated medicine.

Republicans believe that a government-run health plan that doesn't guarantee access to care -- like the Medicaid program in Governor Dean's hometown -- isn't real coverage at all.

That's why House Republicans have formed a working group, on which I sit, to develop solutions that will expand access to affordable, quality healthcare.

Our working group's proposals will keep doctors and patients, not government bureaucrats, at the center of healthcare.

Governor Dean may claim that a government-run health plan would not provide "inferior" healthcare, but the citizens of his hometown -- and even his wife -- may disagree.

Republicans believe that Americans deserve better. And we look forward to working to achieve that aim.

U.S. Congressman Phil Gingrey, M.D. represents Georgia's 11th Congressional District and is cochairman of the GOP Doctors Caucus.

More Competition in Health Care
by Bill Press

On health care, we are, in short, paying more for less -- in a system that is so complicated, so multilayered that even those who can afford it find it impossible to negotiate. The status quo is no longer acceptable or affordable.

Ailments in Our Health Care Debate
by Clarence Page

As debate over President Obama's health care proposals kicks off, his opponents are lining up in a predictable way. On one side, conservatives call Obama a "socialist." On the other side, left-progressives wish that he were

When Healthcare Reform Hits Grandma
by Bernadine Healy M.D.

Obama has laid the groundwork for a massive overhaul of America's healthcare system into a more publicly managed, cost-conscious enterprise that focuses more on wellness than sickness. Driving most government outlays, however, are the many millions of Americans, particularly the elderly, with extremely resource-intensive chronic diseases.

However, what's tried and true, is the government's power to restrict reimbursement and change medical behavior. Medicare, which covers virtually all of the elderly, can say "No" to expensive treatments. That's great if the care is unnecessary. But you can't always tell if you're not at the bedside.

(c) 2009 U.S. News & World Report

Rating President Obama's First 100 Days in Office
by Robert Schlesinger

Two competing, contradictory bits of conventional wisdom regarding president's 1st 100 days in office often connected: A president's 100 days are a critical window into character of administration, but historians argue that it is too short a time period to draw meaningful conclusions.

There's No Place Like Home
President & First Lady Making Themselves Comfortable in Washington
by Amanda Ruggeri

He's striving to save the country from a second Depression, wind down two foreign wars, and fight climate change. So it wouldn't be a surprise if President Barack Obama skipped Friday-night dates with the first lady. Just a few months into office, the first couple have left their mark not only on domestic policy and domesticity but on the city beyond their doors. That's in stark contrast to most previous administrations, insiders say.

The Complex Case of Complexity
by Alvin and Heidi Toffler

In an important recent speech, months after the current financial crisis began, the chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve Board, Ben Bernanke, placed partial blame for the catastrophe on "the sharp increase in the complexity of the financial products offered to consumers." Unfortunately, his description of the problem comes late and underestimates its importance. ...