- MENU
- HOME
- SEARCH
- WORLD
- MAIN
- AFRICA
- ASIA
- BALKANS
- EUROPE
- LATIN AMERICA
- MIDDLE EAST
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Argentina
- Australia
- Austria
- Benelux
- Brazil
- Canada
- China
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- India
- Indonesia
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Japan
- Korea
- Mexico
- New Zealand
- Pakistan
- Philippines
- Poland
- Russia
- South Africa
- Spain
- Taiwan
- Turkey
- USA
- BUSINESS
- WEALTH
- STOCKS
- TECH
- HEALTH
- LIFESTYLE
- ENTERTAINMENT
- SPORTS
- RSS
- iHaveNet.com: Politics
by Clarence Page
Why do Americans so often vote against their own economic interests? Because money isn't everything. Values matter, too, especially when your values tell you that cuts in government spending won't bring new pain to hard workers like you.
That's my simplest answer to that often-perplexing question. Here's a longer one:
The question has taken on new urgency as two big issues drive the politics of this election year: income inequality and growing government debt. White working-class voters form the
The latest surprises to confirm this stereotype-defying trend come in a
Hypocrisy? No, let's be charitable. Many recipients of government benefits have, shall we say, an elastic idea of what constitutes a "government benefit."
I was informed of this in a gigabyte of emails that I received last summer after writing about a study by
Irritated readers responded with personal arguments that basically went like this:
"How dare you refer to (
Believe me, I get it. The dispute here is between what I mean when I say "benefit" and what some people hear. In the years since Ronald Reagan won blue-collar votes by denouncing "welfare queens" and the like, many voters have come to associate the word "benefits" with handouts to "deadbeats" and "losers" and "cheats."
But, sorry, folks, if you think of your
In that values vein, I had a recent email exchange with Charles Murray, the often-controversial libertarian scholar at the
Contrary to common beliefs, the new yuppie-era upper class that Murray labels "Belmont" is adhering to old-school traditional values as measured by such statistical standards as marriage, parenting, work habits and church attendance rates -- while those measures show the new, lesser-educated worker class that he calls "Fishtown" is sliding into a new underclass of long-term unemployment, fatherless children and dependency.
My criticism: Murray's analysis, while important, puts too much of the blame on culture and too little on the seismic structural changes in our economy since the 1960s. The low-skill, high wage jobs that supported American family life in earlier decades largely have been lost to cheaper labor markets overseas.
But, given Murray's view that blue-collar whites are drifting away from the values of upper-class elites, I asked whether he had any thoughts as to why blue-collars whites continue to vote conservative, according to exit polls.
"You've still got a big proportion of Fishtown that's getting married, working hard, etc.," he wrote back. "They're the ones who are most likely to vote (overall voting among the working class is quite low), and also the ones who rationally can vote for conservative candidates. So it's not surprising that the polling results from Fishtown still tend to go Republican."
In other words, the most important values in an election, regardless of income or education, are the ones that motivate you to get off the couch and vote.
AMERICAN POLITICS
WORLD | AFRICA | ASIA | EUROPE | LATIN AMERICA | MIDDLE EAST | UNITED STATES | ECONOMICS | EDUCATION | ENVIRONMENT | FOREIGN POLICY | POLITICS
Turning a Blind Eye to Government Benefits | Politics
© Tribune Media Services