The Latest Battle in the War on Voting
Marge Baker

The kind of big government the Right likes is the kind that keeps certain people from voting

The Republican Party claims to be the party of small government -- with the obvious exceptions of denying marriage equality and reproductive rights. But there's another kind of big government that the party has overwhelmingly and enthusiastically gotten behind: expensive and intrusive attempts to make it harder for Americans to vote.

A recent trio of federal court decisions in Florida, Ohio, and Texas have ripped the lid off the increasingly successful right-wing campaign to limit opportunities for low-income people, minorities, and students to vote -- especially, and not coincidentally, in swing states. These decisions, from even-handed and moderate federal judges across the country, show just how far the Right has gone to use the power of government to make it even harder for traditionally disenfranchised groups to vote.

In Florida, a federal judge permanently blocked a law that had made it almost impossible for good government groups to conduct voter registration drives -- which prompted groups like the venerable League of Women Voters to all but shut down operations in the state.

In Ohio, a federal court ordered the state to reopen early voting in the three days before November's election, which Republicans had attempted to shut down. Early voting on the weekend before the election was enormously successful in 2008 -- especially among African Americans -- and the judge found that Republicans had no legitimate reason to want it to stop.

And finally, a federal court, which is required to review changes in election policy in states and counties with a history of voting discrimination, ruled that Texas' new voter ID law couldn't go forward because it "imposes strict, unforgiving burdens on the poor and racial minorities in Texas."

The effort that Republican governors and legislatures across the country have gone through in the past two years to make it more difficult for citizens to vote is truly remarkable. They have been willing to buck the law while violating the spirit of our constitutional democracy to bar groups of people from participating in it. And they've been willing to set up extra layers of government and bureaucracy -- things they claim to despise -- simply to keep people from the polls.

There are plenty of areas of genuine disagreement in our politics, but the right to vote shouldn't be one of them.

In an interview with The Atlantic, Rep. John Lewis, a civil rights hero, said "there should be public outcry" and a "sense of righteous indignation" at what's happening to our elections.

He's right.

It's astounding that nearly 50 years after the Voting Rights Act banned racial discrimination at the polls, it's still needed as a shield against such egregious violations of its principles. And it's shocking that the self-proclaimed party of small government wants to use government' power to keep people from exercising their fundamental right to vote.

Republicans claim that these new laws combat "voter fraud" -- a serious criminal offense that research shows is exceedingly rare. What they really do is systematically disenfranchise millions of people by making it harder to vote. These are cynical attempts to change the rules of elections in order to win. If they work, we'll be seeing plenty more where they came from.

Read the latest political news.

The Latest Battle in the War on Voting | Politics

Distributed via OtherWords (OtherWords.org)