Team Romney's War Against Facts
It's hard to tell who had a looser grip on reality as the
Who thought it would be a brilliant idea to put the "Dirty Harry" star, his hair reminiscent of the wild-eyed scientist from "Back to the Future," on live TV without notes? As much as it pains some of President
I'll give Eastwood a break, but there's no excuse for the fantasies repeated by myth-building politicians like the evening's star speaker, presidential nominee
For example, Romney grandly promised, "I will begin my presidency with a jobs tour. President Obama began with an apology tour." Ah, there goes "apology tour" again. The line lives in Republican stump speeches, despite having won "four Pinocchios" months ago from the
In fact, the president never has apologized for anything on his foreign trips, although previous presidents have.
Both parties spin some whoppers, of course. But the most significant quote of the week, in my view, came from Romney pollster
He was speaking about the Romney ad and stump speech lines that attack Obama's welfare waiver process, an attack that a variety of media fact-checkers have found to be bogus.
Funny thing, but I thought the credibility of a fact-checker should be judged by the accuracy of their fact-checking, not on what we think might be going on in their heads at the time. Newhouse, I believe, is blurring the line between spin and outright lies.
Spin, by its nature, is a view of reality that depends on the eye of the beholder. Lies are a willfully false reconstruction of reality.
When the welfare ad, for example, says the Obama administration has ended the work requirement in the landmark 1996 welfare reform law, that's simply false. The administration is offering states a chance to apply for more flexibility in determining their own work requirements, if they agree to actually raise the number of people thy move from welfare to work.
Critics argue that states might weaken the work requirements by assigning activities that are not really "work." But that arguable possibility, which always has been present and deserves sensible monitoring, does not change the reality that Obama has not ended the work requirement.
Yet, fact-checkers could hardly catch up with that remark before Romney's running mate, Rep.
For example, he had the audacity to poke at the "
I'm sure the Democrats will have plenty more to say about such omissions and other matters in the weeks to come, just as Republicans will attack shadings of truth from the left. But the pushback by the Romney campaign sounds like they're unveiling a new morality: In some minds, you don't need facts when you have SuperPACs.
It is against such Machiavellian cynicism that independent fact-checking has become a healthy and necessary development in today's information explosion. Fact-checkers give voters a little more of a fighting chance against the well-funded propaganda wars waged by both political sides.
Sure, both sides shade the truth. But that means we, the voters, should be more watchful, not less. After all, If you can't trust a campaign to tell you the truth in their speeches and ads, do you really want to trust them with your
Read the latest political news.
- A Memo to Mitt and Ann Romney
- Mitt Romney's Biggest Problem is His Own Party
- Mitt Romney Can Win By Doing One Thing
- Mitt Romney on the Spot
- Presidential Debates Present Opportunity and Peril for Mitt Romney
- The Presidential Debate: Look for the Plans, Not the Puns
- His Campaign Sliding, Mitt Romney Must Deliver in Debate
- The 'Self-Made' Hallucination of America's Rich
- Why Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are Going Down
- Four Reasons Why Mitt Romney Might Still Win
- America Needs Good Refs -- On the Gridiron and in Politics
- How the GOP Protects Its Falsehoods
- 2012 Election Could Mirror 1980 Race
- A GOP Civil War Simmers
- Mitt Romney Missed Big Chance with Latino Voters
- Mitt Romney's Losing Bid to Win the Latino Vote
- Does Political Discourse Need Geneva Conventions?
- Another Episode in Mitt Romney's Foreign Policy Follies
- Team Romney Doubles Down
- In Defense of the 47 Percent
- The High Cost of Mitt Romney's Candor
- It was a privilege, Mitt Romney
- The Obama Hare and Romney the Tortoise
- An American Shame that Both Candidates Ignore
- Revisiting Wilson's 'Truly Disadvantaged'
- The Poor: America's Forgotten Swing Voters
- Pragmatic Racism
- Mitt Romney's Taxes: Who Cares?
- Waffling on Obamacare will Not Help Mitt Romney
- Why They Call Bill Clinton 'Big Dog'
- Bill Clinton's Secret: Make Little Words Matter
- Bill Clinton Delivers
- Forward to What, Democrats?
- The New Obama Shows Muscle
- Words of Wisdom from a Nun
- Likable Mitt Romney
- Mitt Romney Misjudges Voters
- Mitt Romney's Troubling Pattern
- Mitt Romney's Party -- Checks OK, iPhones Not
- Distractions and Diversions
- The Self-Immolation of Mitt Romney
- The Latest Battle in the War on Voting
- Better Off Today? Don't Ask
- What has Obama Learned?
- Obama Sells Old Ideas as New
- Let George W Bush Be
- Do We Want This Foolish Man?
- Poor Visibility
- Paul Ryan Runs Into the Truth
- Team Romney's War Against Facts
- Both Parties Go to Extremes
- Candidates Have De-Emphasized Foreign Affairs
- Campaign 2012 in a Nutshell: Wrong Ideas vs No Ideas
- Memo to GOP: Demography is Destiny
- Tribe of Liberty
- The Price of Freedom
- Paul Ryan Calling the Kettle Black with Medicare Scare Tactics
- House of Representatives Armed with Irony
- Obama Leads Romney in Post-Conventions Poll
- Character, Policy and the Selection of Leaders
- The Politicization of Violence
- The Selling of American Democracy: The Perfect Storm
- Losing Latino Votes
- The Party is Over: Longtime GOPer Dissects Modern Political Landscape
- Paul Ryan's Faux Populism
- Rise Up, Middle Class, Rise Up!
- A Modest Proposal: Three Weeks of Paid Vacation
- The Paul Ryan Choice
Team Romney's War Against Facts | Politics
(c) 2012 Tribune Media Services, Inc