- MENU
- HOME
- SEARCH
- WORLD
- MAIN
- AFRICA
- ASIA
- BALKANS
- EUROPE
- LATIN AMERICA
- MIDDLE EAST
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Argentina
- Australia
- Austria
- Benelux
- Brazil
- Canada
- China
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- India
- Indonesia
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Japan
- Korea
- Mexico
- New Zealand
- Pakistan
- Philippines
- Poland
- Russia
- South Africa
- Spain
- Taiwan
- Turkey
- USA
- BUSINESS
- WEALTH
- STOCKS
- TECH
- HEALTH
- LIFESTYLE
- ENTERTAINMENT
- SPORTS
- RSS
- iHaveNet.com: Politics
by Clarence Page
Sometimes in politics it is the little questions that throw you.
That thought came to mind as I watched some of President Barack Obama's allies struggle with what should have been a thoroughly predictable question at the beginning of the
It was the famous question that Ronald Reagan raised in speeches on his way to defeating President Jimmy Carter: Are we better off today than we were four years ago?
Amazingly, Team Obama sounded like they weren't sure. On
Senior Strategist David Axelrod showed similar reluctance on "Fox News Sunday," saying only that we're in a "better position" than we'd be under Republican rule.
On
Yikes. Talk about not receiving The Memo. Team Obama's usually efficient message machine sounded like they were caught on the horns of an unfortunate incumbent's dilemma: You don't want to sound too gloomy, because voters will blame the bad news on you. And you don't want to sound too cheery or voters will think you're out of touch with their miserable realities.
Needless to day, Republican nominee Mitt Romney's team pounced. Romney's running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, saw his opportunity to mock the Obama campaign and he took it at a North Carolina rally on Labor Day. "The Jimmy Carter years look like the good old days compared to where we are right now," Ryan scoffed.
By then, everybody in Team Obama was on the same page again with firm declarations of the answer they should have given in the first place. As Vice President Joe Biden put it most succinctly at a Labor Day rally in Detroit, repeating a catch phrase from his earlier speeches: "Osama bin Laden is dead and
Stephanie Cutter, deputy campaign manager, told journalists at a
Are we better off than four years ago? Politically, the exact numbers are less important than how voters feel -- and a lot of us are feeling pretty miserable these days. An
That means, depending on whether you view that glass as half empty or half-full, 58 percent think we're doing the same or better -- or that 69 percent think we doing the same or worse.
With numbers like that, it is remarkable that Obama and Romney have been running about even for months, with Obama slightly ahead in the battleground states. If Obama were running against a less charismatically challenged candidate, his campaign probably would be in much more serious trouble by now.
As the Democratic convention opened, Romney was not showing much of a bump in the polls after his own party's convention. He was running ahead of Obama in public perceptions of his ability to improve the economy but behind on such measures as how well he understands the problems of ordinary people.
That's why Team Obama's fumbling response to the "better off" question is a measure of the challenges that the president faces in a time of economic uncertainty and record deficits. As much as candidate Obama promoted "hope" and "change" four years ago, Team Obama this year stokes fear of what change to a new president could bring.
AMERICAN POLITICS
WORLD | AFRICA | ASIA | EUROPE | LATIN AMERICA | MIDDLE EAST | UNITED STATES | ECONOMICS | EDUCATION | ENVIRONMENT | FOREIGN POLICY | POLITICS
Better Off Today? Don't Ask | Politics
© Tribune Media Services, Inc