ECONOMICS |
EDUCATION |
ENVIRONMENT |
FOREIGN POLICY |
POLITICS |
OPINION |
TRADE
U.S. CITIES:
Don't Tread on the 14th Amendment
Mary Sanchez
Election year scripts are pretty well established in American politics.
For Republicans, the script usually involves a polarizing issue, invariably some imagined threat to the nation or its traditional values, around which the party's handmaidens in the conservative media can be counted on to help whip up hysteria.
This year they've gone for broke with a proposal to revise the U.S. Constitution. Several leading members of
These people come, it is alleged, with the intention of spawning "anchor babies." That is, citizen children who make it impossible for the U.S. to rid itself of the parents. This supposed defect in our Constitution is an irresistible enticement to illegal immigrants and therefore needs to be quashed immediately. For those given to grander conspiracy theories, at least one congressman, Republican
But is there anything to the anchor baby phenomenon, or to the contention of some that the 14th Amendment really was meant to be applied to freed slaves, not to immigrants and most certainly not to the children of illegal immigrants? One way to find out would be to take up the call of Republican leaders such as Sen.
I suspect the first fallacy to unravel would be that of the "anchor baby." Despite this term's increasing acceptance in our lexicon, now even as an epithet, it's a red herring. A child must reach the ripe age of 21 before he can seek to right his parents' illegal status. And the parents have to trek back to their native land. For many people illegally in the country, this trip back will also kick in a 10-year ban from returning. And visas have to be available, which can take decades. So by the time this "anchoring" payoff can happen, one or both parents could be dead.
Why not just make a simpler assumption: that illegal immigrants are coming here to make a better life for their families, which is why immigrants have always come here?
Which brings us to the 14th Amendment's reason for being: to prevent the perpetuation of a civil caste system. Yes, it dealt a final blow to the slavery question, but it also was a rejoinder to the Dred Scott decision, which kept even the children of freed slaves from full citizenship. Subsequent case law and readings of the intent clearly enshrine its broad reach to immigrants and their children, even when the parents are not legally present.
Talk about the majesty and wisdom of our Constitution! This gets to the essence of what it means to be an American. Unlike most nations, even the most advanced democratic ones, we don't have a permanent class of native-born aliens, and for that we should be thankful! To fool with the 14th Amendment is to tread upon the ideal that most of us hold dear: that in America, even those of humble beginnings, those born without silver spoons or even parents without the right paperwork, can succeed with hard work and perseverance.
There is virtually no chance of
It's an old trick, of course. Virtually every immigrant group had to make its way past such shallow tactics and nativist zeal. Thankfully, since 1868 they have had the equalizing force of the 14th amendment on their side.
The problem is not in the U.S. Constitution, but in ourselves.
Available at Amazon.com:
The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy
The Virtues of Mendacity: On Lying in Politics
Bush on the Home Front: Domestic Policy Triumphs and Setbacks
The Political Fix: Changing the Game of American Democracy, from the Grassroots to the White House
Read the latest political news.
- Don't Tread on the 14th Amendment
- Focus on Bush Tax Cuts Masks the Real Issue
- Tea Party Terror
- Republicans Hit Obama for Ground Zero Mosque Comments
- Obama's Ground Zero Mosque Mess
- 'Ground Zero Mosque' Controversy Shows America's New Nativism
- Ground Zero Mosque Presidential Paradox
- Lack of Foresight Let 'Ground Zero Mosque' Controversy Balloon
- Please Mr. President, No More Teachable Moments
- Hope, Hate and Frustration
- Republicans Who Could Replace Michael Steele
- Florida's Marco Rubio Tops List of Tea Party Fundraisers
- Card-Carrying Member of the 'Professional Left'
- Memo to America's Middle Class: Obama Is Just Not That Into You
- National Deficit: The Ticking Debt Bomb
- Obama's Wins on Jobs and Healthcare Don't Mean Much to Voters
- Obama Follows Reagan's Campaign Strategy
- Democrats Push Elizabeth Warren as Consumer Watchdog
- Downsizing Defense
- Iraq - Mission Accomplished II
- Constitutional Amendments and Citizenship Rights
- 2010 Elections: Obama's Key Aides Could Help Democrats in 2010 Election
- 2010 Elections: Boehner Preps to Replace Pelosi as Speaker of the House
- 2010 Elections: Low Hispanic Turnout May Hurt Democrats
- Arizona Immigration Ruling Has Little Impact on 2010 Elections
- Obama: Not Your Grandfather's FDR
- What Year Is This?
- Honing the Obama Pitch
- Nostalgia for Buckley et al Is Misplaced
- Sarah Palin, 'Mama Grizzlies,' Carl Jung, and the Power of Archetypes
- Why We Shouldn't Keep the Bush Tax Cut for the Wealthy
- Magical Thinking in Washington
- Wake Up Washington
- The Final Lesson of BP
- Illogical Immigration
- Iran - The Next War
- Obama's Juggling Act in the Middle East
- Let's Preserve Freedom at Ground Zero
- End Poverty: Export Capitalism
- Why Can't Obama Get Anything Done?
- Washington's Crisis Checklist
- Place the Blame Where It Belongs
- What's Keeping President From Picking Best Person to Protect Consumers?
- Immigration Ruling Correct But 'Civil War' Remains
- Administration Lying About Arizona Immigration Law
- Immigration Problem Requires a Federal Solution
- Arizona Ruling May Backfire for Immigrants
- Immigration Reform Requires More Than Getting Tough or Feeling Good
- Republicans Running on Empty
- 2010 Elections: Republican Summer Action Plan: Hit Democrats, Blog, Retweet
- 2010 Elections: It's Obama Vs. Bush for Democrats on the Campaign Trail
- 2010 Elections: Republicans' Agenda Dilemma
- Democrats Focus on GOP Objections to Unemployment Bill
- Tea Party Candidates Raise Big Money for House Races
- 2010 Elections: Incumbents Work Overtime to Raise Campaign Cash
- 2010 Elections: House Candidates Ramp up Spending Ahead of 2010 Election
- Democrats Pushing Campaign Finance Bill Ahead of 2010 Elections
- None Dare Call It ... What?
- Why Are We Beginning to Hate Congress?
- Corrupt or Just Clueless? You Decide
- Lobbying Royalty Celebrate 20 Years
- Congress Must Act Now to Alleviate Child Hunger
- The GOP's Opportunity ... and Challenge
- Bipartisanship on Hold
- Gingrich Blasts Plan for Mosque at Ground Zero
- Build Mosque Near Ground Zero; It's the American Way
- 'Journolist' Affair: School of Journolism
- 'Journolist' Affair Worse Than Clinton Conspiracy
- 'Journolist' Affair: Open Conspiracy No Longer Merely Ajar
- Outsourcing Government
- The Secrecy State
- Unemployment Extension Win for Obama & Democrats
- The Boundless Beneficence of Big Brother
- Financial Reform Another Talking Point for Obama & Democrats
- New Finance Bill: Mountain of Legislative Paper; Molehill of Reform
- Obama and Big Business Trade Blame on the Economy
- The New Racial Mess
- Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Post-Racial America
- Chewing Up the Innocent While Spewing Racism
- Shirley Sherrod - Perils of the 24/7 News Cycle
- Breitbart's Bum Story
- Bad Boy of Pseudo-Journalism Exposes Himself
- 2010 Elections: Tea Party Dilemma
- A Tea House Divided
- Republicans Are Turning Against the Afghanistan War
- Chuck Schumer Is Most Active Member of Congress
- Financial Reform: Obama's Sales Challenge
Don't Tread on the 14th Amendment | Politics
(c) 2010 Mary Sanchez
