The Minimum Wage and The Meaning of a Decent Society
Robert B. Reich
Raising the minimum wage from
Republicans say it will cause employers to shed jobs, but that's baloney. Employers won't outsource the jobs abroad or substitute machines for them because jobs at this low level of pay are all in the local personal-service sector (retail, restaurant, hotel and so on), where employers pass on small wage hikes to customers as pennies more on their bills.
States that have set their minimum wage closer to
This doesn't mean we could raise the minimum to
We raised the minimum wage in 1996, when I was secretary of labor. Republicans claimed it would kill jobs then, too. It didn't. In fact, job growth accelerated.
When you add in the Earned Income Tax Credit and food stamps, it's barely possible for someone receiving a
Besides, the proposed increase would put more money into the hands of families that desperately need it, allowing them to buy a bit more and thereby keep others working.
A decent society should do no less.
Some conservatives say "decency" has nothing to do with it. Who has the right to decide what's decent? They say we should let the "market" decide what people are paid.
This is one of the oldest conservative canards in existence, based on the false claim that there's something called a "market" that exists separate from society. But there's no "market" in a state of nature, just survival of the fittest.
A society necessarily determines how the "market" is to be organized. Standards of morality and decency play a large role in those decisions.
We set minimum standards for worker safety and consumer protection. Those standards may raise the cost of labor or of the goods and services we buy. But that's a price we're willing to pay.
We decide young children shouldn't be in the labor force. Imagine how cheaply we could get our roofs shingled if 10-year-olds would do it for a couple of bucks an hour. (Maybe we'd have to throw in an ice cream cone.) But we don't allow this, either.
We do our best to prevent lots of things from being bought and sold -- slaves, dangerous narcotics, babies, votes, sex with children, machine guns and nuclear material. Why not just leave it up to the "market"? Because most of us don't want a market that includes these sorts of transactions.
We decide that citizens shouldn't have to buy certain things that should instead be available to everyone free of charge (paid in effect by all of us through our taxes) -- clean drinking water, K-12 schools, safe bridges, protection from violence, public parks. Why not leave all these up to the "market" and require everyone pay for them individually? That's not the kind of society we want to live in.
Opinions may differ about what decency requires, of course. But we hash this out in our democracy. Sometimes we decide certain proposed minimum standards are too costly or inefficient, or they can't be enforced, or they impose unwarranted constraints on our freedoms.
Different societies come up with different answers. Handguns are banned in most other advanced nations, for example. Workers have more protections than they do in
Every society must necessarily decide for itself what decency requires. That's the very meaning of a "society."
Don't fall for the mindless assertion that "markets" know best. Markets are human creations, requiring human beings to decide how they are structured and maintained.
The toughest questions we're facing today -- whether, and how much, to raise the minimum wage; whether, and how, to restrict the availability of guns; whether, and how, to expand health care coverage -- inevitably require us to define what we mean by a decent society.
- Economic Strategy for Better Jobs, Not Just Higher Profits
- Fast-food Workers Echo Occupy Spirit
- Inside the Superstar Economy of America's Big Thinkers
- The Real Economy: The Weather is Still Stormy
- Family Values and the New Economy
- The Nation-State and the Global Corporation
- A Good-Paying Job More Effective than a Lecture
- The Rich Life or the Good Life?
- The Economic Elephant in the Room: Widening Inequality
- Austerity Leaves Us Crying '96 Tears'
- Capitalism Is Not Dying
- Banking on the Poor
- Tracking CEO Pay
- The Stealth Sequester
- Half-Baked Economic Theories Continue to Direct Global Economy
- Why There's a Bull Market for Investors and a Bear Market for Workers
- The Contest Over Defining Our Biggest Economic Problem
- A Shortage of Mercy
- The Minimum Wage and The Meaning of a Decent Society
- The Hoax of Austerity Economics
- The Non-Zero-Sum Society
- Raising the Minimum Wage Would Boost Economy
- Poverty Still America's Vicious Cycle
- Government Spending That Isn't Smart
- Time to Break Up the Biggest Wall Street Banks
- Report Highlights Economic Threat of Hacking
- The Hoax of 'Entitlement Reform'
- Grow the Economy by Growing the Debate About It
- The Great Decoupling
- Why We Must Stop Obsessing About the Budget Deficit
- Christmas-Shopping Season Highlights Plight of Retail Workers
- The Holiday Shopping Guide for Hard Times
- The 'Land of Opportunity' is Becoming Hollywood Fiction
- The Fiscal Cliff: False Fears and Horrors
- Another Side of Economic Inequality
- Don't Cut Our Kids Out of the Budget
- Republicans and Democrats Playing Game of Economic Chicken
- The Trojan Horse in the Debt Debate
- The Dead-End Servant Economy
- Q&A with Joseph Stiglitz: 'The Price of Inequality'
The Minimum Wage and The Meaning of a Decent Society | Economy
(c) 2013 Tribune Media Services, Inc.