Abandoning the banquet in favour of the smart phone
When people ask me whether at 37 I am too young to be an ambassador, I sometimes wonder if perhaps I am too old. I worked in No 10 for the last 'pen' PM,
This digital tsunami is also rocking the
So nowhere should we be more attuned to social media than in international relations. Diplomacy has always been Darwinian: we have to evolve or die, just as diplomats did when sea routes opened up or the telephone was invented. Someone once said that you could replace the Foreign Office with a fax. We saw off the fax, and -- only this year -- the telegram. Now we have to show that you cannot replace us with Wikipedia and
Social media are now indispensable to our core tasks: information harvesting; analysis; influence; promotion of English as the code for cyberspace; crisis management; commercial work. Imagine a reception at which all your key contacts were interacting. You would not stand in the corner silently or shouting platitudes, nor delegate the event.
In this brave new digital world, the most effective diplomats will carry an iPad rather than letters of credence; a digital demarche will be more powerful than a diplomatic one; and the setpiece international conference of the 20th century will be replaced by more fluid, open interaction with the people whose interests we represent. For the first time ever, diplomats can engage directly on a meaningful scale with the countries we live in. We no longer have to focus solely on elites to make our case.
This is exciting, challenging and subversive. Getting it wrong could start a war: imagine if a diplomat misguidedly tweeted a link to the offensive anti-Islam film which provoked riots across the Muslim world. Getting it right has the potential to rewrite the diplomatic rulebook.
So we must now become digital interventionists. I think, like the best traditional statecraft, Twiplomacy comes down to authenticity, engagement and purpose. Twitter is more raw, more human than normal diplomatic interaction: people are more likely to stick around to read your press releases if they know something about you as a person. We need to interact, not transmit. We need to be about action not reportage, about purpose not platitudes.
So tweets should be about changing the world, not just describing how it looks. While alliances will become more issue-based and fluid, diplomats cannot lose sight of our bottom line, the national interest: what makes my country richer and more secure?
I'm not, however, at the libertarian end of the Assange/Kissinger scale. I do not want to live in Wikiworld, and do not think you should want that either. A report recently concluded that social media could not replace diplomacy. Of course it cannot -- there is still a need for direct private conversations between leaders, for intelligence and confidential analysis, for robust discussion of national interests.
The nuances and subtleties do not always translate to 140 characters. Much has to be handled backstage, however many of us become what the Economist calls 'Tweeting Talleyrands'. While social media tends to support our values, it also unleashes forces that oppose these values: extremism, cynicism, distraction, apathy.
The digital revolution has opened up a new frontier. Equipped with the right kit and the right courage, diplomats should -- as ever -- be among its pioneers. Diplomacy not just for diplomats; but not diplomacy without diplomats.
- Financial Nerve Centres at Risk of Flooding
- The Growth That Never Was
- A Gospel of Wealth
- Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super Rich
- The Cyber Menace
- Cyber Threats: Establishing the First Line of Defense
- Arming The Information Highway Patrol
- Keeping the Global Ship on Course
- Global Governance at Heart of Failed Foreign Policies
- Global Terrorism: Piles of Skulls
- When Terrorists 'Killed' in Drone Strikes Aren't Really Dead
- Stripping Down to 140 Characters
- Revolution through iDemocracy
- Test Driving The Bamboo Bone Shaker
- What Tyrants Fear Most: Social Media
- Dambisa Moyo: 'Winner Take All'
- Nuclear Weapons Could Become Obsolete
- The Moral Equivalent of Nuremberg
- Rushdie: 'Vampires Shrivel in the Sunlight'
- Q&A with Joseph Stiglitz: 'The Price of Inequality'
- Children Often the Targets of Islamic Extremists
- Education Can Replace the Loss of Hope
- United Nations Picks Wrong Education Partners
- Testing the Limits of Globalization
- We're Too Tolerant of Corruption at Home
- No Need for a Witch Hunt Over Executive Pay
- Beyond Money
- 50-Year War Against Drugs Has Failed: A New Approach is Needed
- Drugs Legalization Could Make Things Worse
- Time to Separate Drugs Policy from Crime
- Organized Crime Won't Fade Away
- Is Treating The Symptoms The Way Forward?
- Heads of State Show Lack of Faith in Own Health-Care Systems
- On Drugs and Democracy
- Financial Markets, Politics and the New Reality
- BRICs Should Focus on their Own Problems
- The Persistent Threat to Soft Targets
- The Rich Grabbing Bigger Slices of Pie
- 21 Trillion Dollars Hidden in Tax Havens
(c) 2012 Tribune Media Services, Inc.