- MENU
- HOME
- SEARCH
- WORLD
- MAIN
- AFRICA
- ASIA
- BALKANS
- EUROPE
- LATIN AMERICA
- MIDDLE EAST
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Argentina
- Australia
- Austria
- Benelux
- Brazil
- Canada
- China
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- India
- Indonesia
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Japan
- Korea
- Mexico
- New Zealand
- Pakistan
- Philippines
- Poland
- Russia
- South Africa
- Spain
- Taiwan
- Turkey
- USA
- BUSINESS
- WEALTH
- STOCKS
- TECH
- HEALTH
- LIFESTYLE
- ENTERTAINMENT
- SPORTS
- RSS
- iHaveNet.com
By William Pfaff
The blood runs cold when one fully appreciates how vulnerable official policymakers and the Western policy community is to slogans and to magical thinking. The Reinhart-Rogoff case is the latest, and certainly will not be the last, in which the credulity and carelessness of experts wreak havoc among ordinary people -- in this case, ordinary people by the millions.
The Reinhart-Rogoff error was initially rumor but in the past week has become a scandal. Professors Carmen Reinhart and the former chief economist of the
"Ah ha!" the economic and governmental policy community in the U.S. and Europe cried! Here's just what we need! The method to end the debt crisis responsible for the great slump! All we have to do is to starve all the indebted societies, cut government services and eliminate workers, and soon investor confidence will be restored and the crisis will end in a way that vindicates currently dominant economic theory, validates the
Nobody seems to have checked the Reinhart-Rogoff paper, since it was exactly what governments, politicians and academic economists wanted.
Then another professor, at the
According to
I am not writing this simply to pile onto the economists who so casually have put the Western world into this mess. I am concerned at this demonstration of the credulity or legerity of policy professionals who accept such propositions even when they seem self-evidently too good to be true, or even when they defy common sense.
In the latter respect, there is Marxism itself, which so entranced so much of the European and subsequently Asian (and much of the American) intellectual worlds when it was proposed as a "science" of history. It was, of course, in no sense a science, even as science was understood at the time of "The Communist Manifesto" in 1848 and of Marx's major theoretical work, "Capital," in 1867.
It was the Bolshevik Revolution that made Marxism famous, but revolution had not followed the course Marxist "science" predicted, since it foresaw worldwide revolution conducted by the industrial working class, which hardly existed in rural Russia, and existed not at all in China -- scene of the second of the two great Marxist revolutions. Peasant armies defeated the white and European interventionist armies in Russia after 1918, and under Maoist command, peasant revolutionaries defeated Chiang Kai-Shek in China, and later stalemated American armies in Korea.
All one can say about Marxism's role is that in both places it supplied what might be called a moral message of predicted revolutionary victory, which was a vital motivational factor in those revolutions. That may have been crucial, but Communist doctrine was false.
Moving to our own times, the United States has been spending itself in Southeast Asian wars, and then Middle Eastern and South Asian wars, because of two spurious theories. The first was the domino theory of Asian Communism's potential for launching worldwide revolution, which American officials and advisers believed had to be thwarted, whatever the cost. The current political fantasy behind American policy is the notion launched by Samuel Huntington of a "clash of civilizations" about to break out between Islamic civilization and the West.
This was seized upon by the George W. Bush administration and neo-conservative forces in the U.S. to justify the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, when America had merely been attacked by a small band of religious extremists. Washington's reckless response eventually convinced a huge audience in the Islamic world that the U.S. today is really waging such a war. Just last week, one of the young, accused perpetrators of the Boston Marathon bombings was quoted as having said long before the event that the U.S. was "at war" with Islam and had to be stopped. Thus does the contemporary world march to the drumbeat of half-baked theories.
© Tribune Media Services, "Half-Baked Economic Theories Continue to Direct Global Economy"
WORLD | AFRICA | ASIA | EUROPE | LATIN AMERICA | MIDDLE EAST | UNITED STATES | ECONOMICS | EDUCATION | ENVIRONMENT | FOREIGN POLICY | POLITICS
Half-Baked Economic Theories Continue to Direct Global Economy | News of the World