- MENU
- HOME
- SEARCH
- WORLD
- MAIN
- AFRICA
- ASIA
- BALKANS
- EUROPE
- LATIN AMERICA
- MIDDLE EAST
- United Kingdom
- United States
- Argentina
- Australia
- Austria
- Benelux
- Brazil
- Canada
- China
- France
- Germany
- Greece
- Hungary
- India
- Indonesia
- Ireland
- Israel
- Italy
- Japan
- Korea
- Mexico
- New Zealand
- Pakistan
- Philippines
- Poland
- Russia
- South Africa
- Spain
- Taiwan
- Turkey
- USA
- BUSINESS
- WEALTH
- STOCKS
- TECH
- HEALTH
- LIFESTYLE
- ENTERTAINMENT
- SPORTS
- RSS
- iHaveNet.com
By Jules Witcover
The mounting U.S. casualties in Afghanistan, together with the avalanche of leaked military documents reporting failures on the ground there, are raising further doubts about accomplishing the mission to build a stable Afghan government.
It's fine for President Obama and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates to say there isn't much new in the documents that chronicle military mistakes from 2004 to 2009. But the daily dribble of reported American deaths is a continuing fresh reminder of the human cost of the war now in its ninth year.
On top of that, new reports of the huge financial burden of maintaining not only the 100,000 U.S. troops now in Afghanistan but also propping the Afghan economy and security are adding fuel to the questioning at home of the mission itself.
According to a recent Pentagon report to
The report follows another account of what amounts to the bribery of Taliban and Afghan tribal chief "toll collectors" on provincial highways to facilitate the safe passage of supply truck convoys. Private Afghan contractors have been among the facilitators, at American taxpayer expense.
Furthermore, the continuing reports of high-level corruption in the regime of President Hamid Karzai remain a nagging toothache for to the Obama administration as it pursues the fight against the remnants of the al-Qaida network that perpetrated the terrorist attacks of 9/11.
As in Iraq, waging the war in Afghanistan has led to the huge construction of American facilities, and with them tremendous costs for security meted out to private contractors. But unlike in Iraq, where most were U.S. firms, in Afghanistan most of the contractors are Afghans, taxing the American capacity to monitor the arrangements.
Although
The results of those midterm elections, in which deep Democratic losses are widely expected, will come only two months before Obama's scheduled reassessment of his Afghanistan troop surge, and his accompanying plan to start withdrawing U.S. forces just six months later.
If those Democratic setbacks occur, and especially if they should result in a Republican takeover of one or both houses of
Democratic Rep. Jim McGovern of Massachusetts, a leader of the antiwar bloc in the House, has argued that the leaked documents attesting to American military mistakes in Afghanistan support his case for U.S. withdrawal. "All of the puzzle has been put together, and it is not a pretty picture," he said. "Things are really ugly over there. I think the
Meanwhile, Democratic Sens. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin and Jim Webb of Virginia have sent a letter to Obama arguing that any plan to continue the war in Afghanistan as a campaign in nation building beyond rooting out al-Qaida should be submitted to the
"My concern is, whether you want to call this nation building or not, it isn't sufficiently about al-Qaida," Feingold said. "
To date, however, Feingold's antiwar views have been routinely been ignored at the
Available at Amazon.com:
At War with the Weather: Managing Large-Scale Risks in a New Era of Catastrophes
© Jules Witcover
WORLD | AFRICA | ASIA | EUROPE | LATIN AMERICA | MIDDLE EAST | UNITED STATES | ECONOMICS | EDUCATION | ENVIRONMENT | FOREIGN POLICY | POLITICS
World - Afghanistan: The Cost of Nation Building | Global Viewpoint