Supreme Court's Citizens United Decision Will Warp Policymaking
The massive campaign spending Citizens United Decision has unlocked favors the GOP
Michael Waldman is executive director of the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University law school.
We now approach the first general election of the Citizens United era. That ruling upended decades of precedent and nearly a century of settled law to hold that corporate campaign spending limits violate the First Amendment. The opinion was the most controversial in years. By the time President Obama finished scolding the justices at the State of the Union address, polls showed public disapproval of the ruling by 80-20.
Critics warned it would tilt the playing field of American politics. But others, with worldly cynicism, shrugged that it wouldn't change much. Corporations would be intimidated and fearful of angering customers. Plus ça change.
Just this once, the Chicken Littles were onto something. Citizens United has loosed a tide of massive -- and alarmingly sneaky -- spending. For all the Tea Party hubbub, this election's major factor could be cold, anonymous cash.
Labor unions were the first to take advantage of the new rules, spending $10 million in an Arkansas U.S. Senate race. Then Target Corp. reaped consumer boycotts after it gave money to an anti-gay referendum campaign in Minnesota. Perhaps the fear of public backlash would hold spending in check after all.
Alas, it was not to be so. Citizens United came after years where the Court chipped away at existing, needed campaign laws. Now the new ruling has unlocked massive campaign spending, much of it through front groups, cutouts, and nonprofits, without disclosing who is paying the bill. Money talks, but refuses to leave its name. Target routed its controversial funding through the blandly named MN Forward. In West Virginia, mining executives are setting up "527 groups" (which can delay disclosure until after November 2) to help elect coal-friendly candidates. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which does not disclose its backers, has pledged to spend $75 million in the midterm elections. When political funders skirt the rules, few fear a regulatory response. Citizens United seems less a doctrine than a starter pistol.
This year, the anonymous funding vastly favors the GOP . Other years, the money may favor Democrats. But there can be little doubt it will warp policymaking. Lawmakers who vote on bank regulation, say, will know that a pro-consumer stance could be punished with sudden, secret spending for a foe. Lobbyists have a new bludgeon with which to persuade.
What to do? The simplest step is to strengthen disclosure. Yet last week, new rules were blocked by a unanimous GOP vote in the Senate -- even though Republicans once championed disclosure as an alternative to spending caps. We can require corporate managers to give shareholders a meaningful say before spending on campaigns, and encourage responsible firms to hold back. We can boost the power of small donors through voluntary public financing of campaigns. A House panel just passed this plan, setting the stage for a new drive for change. In coming years, we must push back against the judicial approach that says the First Amendment protects the power of special interests, but offers little protection for the rights of voters to have fair and participatory elections. If all else fails, a Constitutional amendment may be needed. And we will have to redouble efforts to expose the new flow of fishy money.
So: Did Citizens United matter? The answer is yes -- significantly. And unless remedied, the ruling points toward a truly dystopian future, when candidates, campaigns, and parties are drowned out by special interest funding as loud as it is stealthy.
Read why Citizens United is good for democracy, by John Samples, director of the Cato Institute's Center for Representative Government.
Available at Amazon.com:
Read the latest political news.
- Eliminating Poverty: Lesson From Childhood
- Wall Street Had a Meltdown, and All We Got (Besides the Bill) Was an Interminable Argument
- Changing Our Tune to Natural Gas
- Supreme Court's Citizens United Decision Will Warp Policymaking
- Citizens United Decision: Money at Issue Funds Speech Not Candidates
- Education and Wealth: Strongest Predictors of a Long Life
- 'Citizen Journalism' Fad is Not Journalism
- Life's Little Lows Big Part of Going to High School
- Happiness is a Matter of Perspective
- Binge Drinking Numbers Rising
- The Republicans' Bizarre Attacks on Elites
- Joe Klein and Diane Sawyer Tour the Real Reality
- Troubled Times: When Mark Zuckerberg's Generosity Is Not Good Enough
- Why on Earth Does America Want a Stronger Chinese Currency?
- A Nation of Peasants?
- Public Sector Workers Are the New Privileged Elite Class
- Raising Retirement Age Will Help Save Social Security
- Cutting Benefits Isn't the Way to Save Social Security
- How the New Consumer Bureau Will Help You
- Setting up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
- The Truth Behind UFO Sightings and the U.S. Air Force
- American Dream of Home Ownership Has Become a Nightmare
- 5 Traits of the New American Consumer
- Stoned on Righteousness
- Frank Assessment of Teacher Performance Not Pleasant but Useful
- Large-Spirited America
- America: A Labor of Love
- America: Love's Labor Lost
- What We Need to Do to Save America's Middle Class
- Out of the Media Muck an Idiot Emerges
- Dilemma of the Open Megaphone
- Let's Keep Our Enemies Straight
- Can the CIA Put a U.S.-Born al Qaeda Figure on its 'Kill List'?
- A Christian Voice Argues for Banning Nuclear Weapons
- Will New York's Mosque Protests Aid Terrorist Recruiters?
- Repealing 14th Amendment Would Not Fix Immigration System
- 14th Amendment Doesn't Make Illegal Aliens' Children Citizens
- Immigration Reform Requires More Than Getting Tough or Feeling Good
- Defending a New Domain: The Pentagon's Cyberstrategy
- Before Katrina, There Was New York's 1896 Heat Wave
- EPA Surrenders to NRA on Gun Control Issue
- Rare Sighting: Common Sense from the Bench
- Is the Great Mosque Debate Making Us Stupid?
- Ground Zero Mosque Madness
- Ground Zero Mosque: Islamophobia? Not Really
- Gingrich and Palin: Twin Towers of Intolerance
- Detroit's Agony, America's Choice
- Iraq: U.S. Combat Troops' Departure Leaves Uncertainty in its Wake
- Corporate Rotten Eggs
- Strengthening the Political - Military Relationship
- A New Plan For Nuclear Postures
- Why the National Security Establishment Is Outdated
- Protecting the Pentagon Budget
- Approving the New START Treaty Keeps America Safe
- The New START Treaty Weakens U.S. National Security
- 'Ground Zero Mosque' Controversy Shows America's New Nativism
- Ground Zero Mosque Presidential Paradox
- Lack of Foresight Let 'Ground Zero Mosque' Controversy Balloon
- Republicans Hit Obama for Ground Zero Mosque Comments
- Obama's Ground Zero Mosque Mess
- The Sum of Our Parts
- The End of Books
- Steven Slater Airline Meltdown Hardly a Surprise
- Conversation on Race? We're Not Ready
- Everyone a Bigot?
- Let's Preserve Freedom at Ground Zero
- 10 Things You Didn't Know About Social Security
- Illogical Immigration
- Constitutional Amendments and Citizenship Rights
- Iran - The Next War
- How to Maximize Your Social Security Benefits
- How Working Longer Helps Build Retirement Security
- Social Security Inflation Adjustment Debate
- 21 Ways to Make Extra Money in Retirement
- Will You Run Out of Money Before You Run Out of Years?
- The Economy's Lasting Impact on Your Retirement
- Unconventional Retirement Investing Strategies
- Another Retirement Challenge for Women: Income Gender Gap
- 15 Ways to Tell if You Are Ready to Retire
- Investing Your Social Security Check? Consider These Factors
- Alternatives to Traditional Retirement
- 10 Uncommon Sources of Income in Retirement
- Sizing Up Your Retirement Nest Egg Needs
- Biggest Sources of Retirement Income
- Assembling a Sturdy Retirement Portfolio
- Retirement Savings Strategies for Late Starters
- 7 Reasons to Downsize in Retirement
- How to Tell if You Are Saving Enough for Retirement
Supreme Court's Citizens United Decision Will Warp Policymaking
(c) 2010 U.S. News & World Report