Global Warming a Hoax & the Earth is Flat   (c) David Horsey

Ari Axelrod is a corporate fellow at the Center for Emerging Market Enterprises, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.

Biofuels are a conundrum.

Their potential advantages are undeniable: reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, lessening of our dependency on imported oil, support of domestic agriculture. And they certainly have their supporters. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 aggressively mandate biofuels to replace 20 percent of the U.S. petroleum gasoline consumption, or 36 billion gallons. More recently, the Obama administration repeatedly affirmed its backing of rapid development of alternative energy sources, including biofuels.

Still, the hurdles are high.

The first is feedstock. In 2008, about 20 percent of the U.S. corn acreage was used for bioethanol feedstock production. It is clear that an even moderate increase of this allocation, let alone three- or four-fold increase required to achieve production of 36 billion gallons, would have profound negative impacts on the availability and cost of food. Meeting the mandate using existing commercially available corn starch technology is simply not feasible.

One possible answer is the so-called cellulosic ethanol technology, which, according to the mandate, is supposed to produce almost as much ethanol as the corn-based one by 2022. Its primary appeal is in the ability of cellulosic conversion to use practically any organic matter as feedstock, be it agricultural refuse, forestry byproducts, or rapidly growing switchgrass, cultivated on lands otherwise not usable for agriculture. Recently, cellulosic technology has been a primary target of the venture capital investment. As a result, several pilot plants are already either in operation or under construction. While their commercial viability remains to be proven, it is likely, given the large amount of capital and talent directed into cellulosic R&D, that the workable conversion technology will be successfully developed, possibly soon.

Ethanol, however, faces two more challenges, each of them by far more formidable.

The first is consumer acceptance. Meeting the government mandate requires implementation of high-blend (ethanol concentration of up to 85 percent) fuels. Yet in concentrations above 10-15 percent, ethanol is corrosive and can cause cold-start problems. So called flexible-fuel vehicles overcome these issues, but at the cost of additional equipment, some added weight, etc. While several auto companies, including GM, do manufacture them in increasing numbers as part of their "green" programs, their fraction in the overall U.S. fleet is quite small. Additionally, FFVs are predominantly SUVs and light trucks with large engines and relatively low fuel efficiency. It is, thus, unclear whether promoting such vehicles contributes to or, in fact, impedes our quest for emission reduction and energy independence. What's even more problematic is that ethanol contains approximately 25 percent less energy than the same volume of regular gasoline. At low blends (up to 10 percent), the less than 3 percent reduction of fuel efficiency is virtually unnoticeable to a common driver. As ethanol concentration increases, however, the need for more frequent refueling stops becomes a bother.

The second issue is the absence of ethanol transportation and retail infrastructure. Because of its corrosiveness, pure ethanol and high-blend ethanol fuels must be transported by specially equipped tankers, stored in dedicated tanks, and dispensed by separate pumps. The cost of such infrastructure upgrades is staggering. With razor-thin margins in gasoline retailing, any private company will, understandably, find such investment difficult to justify -- particularly in light of questionable demand. The government does provide some support in the form of investment tax credits, but the benefits have proven to be too small to make a real difference. With the exception of certain areas in the Midwest, the number of high-blend refueling stations remains extremely limited, effectively undermining the attractiveness of driving a flexible-fuel vehicle.

With oil prices on the rise again, the interest in alternative fuels is bound to increase. What can be done to speed up development of biofuels? One possibility would be a massive, government-sponsored ethanol infrastructure buildup, paid for, for instance, by imposing additional levies and incentives (taxes, caps, credits, permits, etc.) on petroleum companies and/or consumers. The benefits of this approach are, indeed, debatable, but at least it would resolve the chicken-and-egg (ethanol demand/ethanol infrastructure) scenario. Another strategy would be to discourage development of ethanol-based fuels (as well as flexible-fuel vehicles) and direct public support toward "drop-in" fuels, e.g., butanol, and "designer fuels" that can be added to regular gasoline in any proportion without engine or retail infrastructure modifications. There is, of course, a possibility of abandoning a national biofuels policy altogether, leaving it to individual markets, e.g., the Midwest, where biofuels already have a noticeable presence.

Each of these strategies has advantages and drawbacks. Each will have profound impacts on the industry. There will be winners and losers. The worst alternative, however, is having a national biofuels policy that is internally inconsistent.

 

 

Climate Change Bill Faces Hurdles in the Senate
Kent Garber

To pass climate change legislation in the House last month, Speaker Nancy Pelosi needed 218 votes. She got 219: 211 Democrats plus 8 Republicans. By almost the narrowest of margins, the House voted to put a cap on the country's greenhouse gas emissions. Now the debate goes to the Senate, where passage will probably be just as tough. California Sen. Barbara Boxer, who chairs the Senate Environment Committee, is leading the effort

By Michael Osbun

Plan to Combat Global Warming: Pie in the Sky
Jonah Goldberg

Whenever you hear a politician start a sentence with, "If we can put a man on the moon ... ," grab your wallet.

The latest example of anthropogenic-lunar empowerment is global warming. Al Gore and Barack Obama routinely cite the Apollo program as proof that we can make good on the president's messianic campaign pledge to stem the rising ocean tides and hasten the healing of the planet.

How the Global Warming Bill Will Affect Your Wallet
Matthew Bandyk

How much will the Waxman-Markey bill cost the average American? In the coming weeks, Congress will likely consider a massive global-warming bill to create a new cap-and-trade program to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. President Obama praised the bill, dubbed Waxman-Markey for its co-sponsors, as a vital step to create millions of new jobs all across America

Norman Borlaug: Population Growth Requires Second Green Revolution
Norman Borlaug Nobel Laureate Interview

Norman Borlaug is known as the father of the Green Revolution. His work with high-yield, disease-resistant wheat varieties is credited with saving as many as a billion people from starvation worldwide. Borlaug was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1970 in recognition of his contributions to world peace through increasing food supply. At age 95, a recent interview ...

Composting: From Garden to Kitchen to Garden

The key to a good garden is good compost, and every gardener worth his salt should be making his own. Compost is a wonderful thing, plants are happy when grown in this sweet black soil amendment. Making your own is easy. Anything that once was living will eventually become compost. The trick is how fast you can harvest it.

Greening My House
Arianna Huffington

Ever since I saw the Green light, thanks to my friend Laurie David, and traded in my gas-guzzling SUV, I've tried my best to up my eco-awareness.

Environmental Engineering Jobs & Careers

Find your next job saving our planet as an Environmental Engineer. Search for Environmental engineering positions from thousands of job and career search sites. A search engine for jobs with a different approach to job and career searches. In one simple search, job seekers get free access to millions of employment opportunities from thousands of websites.

 

(c) 2009 U.S. News & World Report